Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
People in this club who perform in school talent shows often attend and are very engaged with school events.
People in this club either perform in school talent shows often or are inactive and disinterested community members.
People in this club who chaperone high school dances are not students who attend the school.
All people in this club who are inactive and disinterested members of their community chaperone high school dances.
All young children and teenagers in this club who wish to further their academic careers and educational opportunities are students who attend the school.
Bonnie is in this club and she either both attends and is very engaged with school events and is a student who attends the school or is not someone who both attends and is very engaged with school events and is not a student who attends the school.
Here is a conclusion:
Bonnie performs in school talent shows often.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
People in this club who perform in school talent shows often attend and are very engaged with school events.
People in this club either perform in school talent shows often or are inactive and disinterested community members.
People in this club who chaperone high school dances are not students who attend the school.
All people in this club who are inactive and disinterested members of their community chaperone high school dances.
All young children and teenagers in this club who wish to further their academic careers and educational opportunities are students who attend the school.
Bonnie is in this club and she either both attends and is very engaged with school events and is a student who attends the school or is not someone who both attends and is very engaged with school events and is not a student who attends the school.
Here is a conclusion:
If Bonnie is either both a young child or teenager who wishes to further her academic career and educational opportunities and chaperones high school dances or neither is a young child nor teenager who wishes to further her academic career and educational opportunities, then Bonnie is either a student who attends the school or is an inactive and disinterested member of the community.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
People in this club who perform in school talent shows often attend and are very engaged with school events.
People in this club either perform in school talent shows often or are inactive and disinterested community members.
People in this club who chaperone high school dances are not students who attend the school.
All people in this club who are inactive and disinterested members of their community chaperone high school dances.
All young children and teenagers in this club who wish to further their academic careers and educational opportunities are students who attend the school.
Bonnie is in this club and she either both attends and is very engaged with school events and is a student who attends the school or is not someone who both attends and is very engaged with school events and is not a student who attends the school.
Here is a conclusion:
If Bonnie either chaperones high school dances or, if she does not, she performs in school talent shows often, then Bonnie is both a young child or teenager who wishes to further her academic career and educational opportunities and an inactive and disinterested member of the community.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All employees who schedule a meeting with their customers will go to the company building today.
Everyone who has lunch in the company building schedules meetings with their customers.
Employees have lunch either in the company building or at home.
If an employee has lunch at home, they are working remotely from home.
All employees who are in other countries work remotely from home.
No managers work remotely from home.
James will appear in the company today if and only if he is a manager.
Here is a conclusion:
James has lunch in the company.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All employees who schedule a meeting with their customers will go to the company building today.
Everyone who has lunch in the company building schedules meetings with their customers.
Employees have lunch either in the company building or at home.
If an employee has lunch at home, they are working remotely from home.
All employees who are in other countries work remotely from home.
No managers work remotely from home.
James will appear in the company today if and only if he is a manager.
Here is a conclusion:
James does not have lunch in the company.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All employees who schedule a meeting with their customers will go to the company building today.
Everyone who has lunch in the company building schedules meetings with their customers.
Employees have lunch either in the company building or at home.
If an employee has lunch at home, they are working remotely from home.
All employees who are in other countries work remotely from home.
No managers work remotely from home.
James will appear in the company today if and only if he is a manager.
Here is a conclusion:
If James is either a manager or in other countries,  then James does not either has lunch at home or work remotely from home. If James either has lunch at home or works remotely from home, then he is neither a manager nor does he work in other countries. [contrapositive is more natural]
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
When the Monkeypox virus occurs in a being, it may get Monkeypox.
Monkeypox virus can occur in certain animals.
Humans are mammals.
Mammals are animals.
Symptoms of Monkeypox include fever, headache, muscle pains, and tiredness.
People feel tired when they get the flu.
Here is a conclusion:
There is an animal.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
When the Monkeypox virus occurs in a being, it may get Monkeypox.
Monkeypox virus can occur in certain animals.
Humans are mammals.
Mammals are animals.
Symptoms of Monkeypox include fever, headache, muscle pains, and tiredness.
People feel tired when they get the flu.
Here is a conclusion:
No one gets the flu.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
When the Monkeypox virus occurs in a being, it may get Monkeypox.
Monkeypox virus can occur in certain animals.
Humans are mammals.
Mammals are animals.
Symptoms of Monkeypox include fever, headache, muscle pains, and tiredness.
People feel tired when they get the flu.
Here is a conclusion:
Symptoms of Monkeypox include coughing.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
There are six types of wild turkeys: Eastern wild turkey, Osceola wild turkey, Gould’s wild turkey, Merriam’s wild turkey, Rio Grande wild turkey, and Ocellated wild turkey.
Tom is not an Eastern wild turkey.
Tom is not an Osceola wild turkey.
Tom is not a Gould's wild turkey.
Tom is neither a Merriam's wild turkey nor a Rio Grande wild turkey.
Tom is a wild turkey.
Here is a conclusion:
Tom is an Ocellated wild turkey.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
There are six types of wild turkeys: Eastern wild turkey, Osceola wild turkey, Gould’s wild turkey, Merriam’s wild turkey, Rio Grande wild turkey, and Ocellated wild turkey.
Tom is not an Eastern wild turkey.
Tom is not an Osceola wild turkey.
Tom is not a Gould's wild turkey.
Tom is neither a Merriam's wild turkey nor a Rio Grande wild turkey.
Tom is a wild turkey.
Here is a conclusion:
Tom is an Eastern wild turkey.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
There are six types of wild turkeys: Eastern wild turkey, Osceola wild turkey, Gould’s wild turkey, Merriam’s wild turkey, Rio Grande wild turkey, and Ocellated wild turkey.
Tom is not an Eastern wild turkey.
Tom is not an Osceola wild turkey.
Tom is not a Gould's wild turkey.
Tom is neither a Merriam's wild turkey nor a Rio Grande wild turkey.
Tom is a wild turkey.
Here is a conclusion:
Joey is a wild turkey.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
A Japanese game company created the game the Legend of Zelda.
All games on the Top 10 list are made by Japanese game companies.
If a game sells more than one million copies, then it will be included in the Top 10 list.
The Legend of Zelda sold more than one million copies.
Here is a conclusion:
The Legend of Zelda is on the Top 10 list.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
A Japanese game company created the game the Legend of Zelda.
All games on the Top 10 list are made by Japanese game companies.
If a game sells more than one million copies, then it will be included in the Top 10 list.
The Legend of Zelda sold more than one million copies.
Here is a conclusion:
FIFA 22 is made by a Japanese video game company.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
A Japanese game company created the game the Legend of Zelda.
All games on the Top 10 list are made by Japanese game companies.
If a game sells more than one million copies, then it will be included in the Top 10 list.
The Legend of Zelda sold more than one million copies.
Here is a conclusion:
The Legend of Zelda is not on the Top 10 list.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All squares are four-sided.
All four-sided things are shapes.
Here is a conclusion:
All squares are shapes.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All rabbits that can be spotted near the campus are cute.
Some turtles can be spotted near the campus.
The only animals that can be spotted near the campus are rabbits and squirrels.
If something is skittish, then it is not calm.
All the squirrels that can be spotted near the campus are skittish.
Rockie can be spotted near the campus, and it is calm.
Here is a conclusion:
Rockie is a turtle.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All rabbits that can be spotted near the campus are cute.
Some turtles can be spotted near the campus.
The only animals that can be spotted near the campus are rabbits and squirrels.
If something is skittish, then it is not calm.
All the squirrels that can be spotted near the campus are skittish.
Rockie can be spotted near the campus, and it is calm.
Here is a conclusion:
Rockie is not a turtle.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All rabbits that can be spotted near the campus are cute.
Some turtles can be spotted near the campus.
The only animals that can be spotted near the campus are rabbits and squirrels.
If something is skittish, then it is not calm.
All the squirrels that can be spotted near the campus are skittish.
Rockie can be spotted near the campus, and it is calm.
Here is a conclusion:
Rockie is a turtle or cute.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All rabbits that can be spotted near the campus are cute.
Some turtles can be spotted near the campus.
The only animals that can be spotted near the campus are rabbits and squirrels.
If something is skittish, then it is not calm.
All the squirrels that can be spotted near the campus are skittish.
Rockie can be spotted near the campus, and it is calm.
Here is a conclusion:
If Rockie is not both a turtle and a squirrel, then Rockie is either cute or skittish.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All rabbits that can be spotted near the campus are cute.
Some turtles can be spotted near the campus.
The only animals that can be spotted near the campus are rabbits and squirrels.
If something is skittish, then it is not calm.
All the squirrels that can be spotted near the campus are skittish.
Rockie can be spotted near the campus, and it is calm.
Here is a conclusion:
If Rockie is cute and calm, then Rockie is a skittish turtle.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
"Stranger Things" is a popular Netflix show.
If a Netflix show is popular, Karen will binge-watch it.
If and only if Karen binge-watches a Netflix show, she will download it.
Karen does not download "Black Mirror."
"Black Mirror" is a Netflix show.
If Karen binge-watches a Netflix show, she will share it with Lisa.
Here is a conclusion:
Karen will share "Stranger Things" with Lisa.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
"Stranger Things" is a popular Netflix show.
If a Netflix show is popular, Karen will binge-watch it.
If and only if Karen binge-watches a Netflix show, she will download it.
Karen does not download "Black Mirror."
"Black Mirror" is a Netflix show.
If Karen binge-watches a Netflix show, she will share it with Lisa.
Here is a conclusion:
"Black Mirror" is popular.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
"Stranger Things" is a popular Netflix show.
If a Netflix show is popular, Karen will binge-watch it.
If and only if Karen binge-watches a Netflix show, she will download it.
Karen does not download "Black Mirror."
"Black Mirror" is a Netflix show.
If Karen binge-watches a Netflix show, she will share it with Lisa.
Here is a conclusion:
Karen will share "Black Mirror" with Lisa.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Beijing is the capital of the People's Republic of China.
Beijing is the capital city of the world's most populous nation.
Beijing is located in Northern China.
Beijing hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics and 2008 Summer Paralympics Games.
Beijing has hosted the Summer and Winter Olympics and the Summer and Winter Paralympics.
Many of Beijing's 91 universities consistently rank among the best universities in the world.
Here is a conclusion:
Beijing hosted both the 2008 Summer Olympics and the Winter Olympics.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Beijing is the capital of the People's Republic of China.
Beijing is the capital city of the world's most populous nation.
Beijing is located in Northern China.
Beijing hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics and 2008 Summer Paralympics Games.
Beijing has hosted the Summer and Winter Olympics and the Summer and Winter Paralympics.
Many of Beijing's 91 universities consistently rank among the best universities in the world.
Here is a conclusion:
Beijing is located in southern China.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Beijing is the capital of the People's Republic of China.
Beijing is the capital city of the world's most populous nation.
Beijing is located in Northern China.
Beijing hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics and 2008 Summer Paralympics Games.
Beijing has hosted the Summer and Winter Olympics and the Summer and Winter Paralympics.
Many of Beijing's 91 universities consistently rank among the best universities in the world.
Here is a conclusion:
Beijing is the second largest Chinese city.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All aliens are extraterrestrials.
If someone is from Mars, then they are an alien.
No extraterrestrials are human.
All highly intelligent beings from Earth are humans.
Marvin is a highly intelligent being.
Marvin is either from Earth and from Mars, or he is from neither.
If Marvin is not from Earth, then Marvin is an extraterrestrial.
Here is a conclusion:
Marvin is an alien.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All aliens are extraterrestrials.
If someone is from Mars, then they are an alien.
No extraterrestrials are human.
All highly intelligent beings from Earth are humans.
Marvin is a highly intelligent being.
Marvin is either from Earth and from Mars, or he is from neither.
If Marvin is not from Earth, then Marvin is an extraterrestrial.
Here is a conclusion:
Marvin is neither a human nor from Mars.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All aliens are extraterrestrials.
If someone is from Mars, then they are an alien.
No extraterrestrials are human.
All highly intelligent beings from Earth are humans.
Marvin is a highly intelligent being.
Marvin is either from Earth and from Mars, or he is from neither.
If Marvin is not from Earth, then Marvin is an extraterrestrial.
Here is a conclusion:
If Marvin is not from Mars, then Marvin is a human.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone at the mixer is a Grand Slam champion or an Oscar-nominated actor.
Every Grand Slam champion at the mixer is a professional tennis player.
All Oscar-nominated actors at the mixer are celebrities.
All professional tennis players at the mixer are athletes.
If a person at the mixer is a celebrity, then they are well paid.
If a person at the mixer is an athlete, then they are famous.
All well-paid people at the mixer live in tax havens.
Djokovic is at the mixer: if Djokovic is a famous athlete, then Djokovic is well-paid.
Here is a conclusion:
Djokovic is a Grand Slam champion.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone at the mixer is a Grand Slam champion or an Oscar-nominated actor.
Every Grand Slam champion at the mixer is a professional tennis player.
All Oscar-nominated actors at the mixer are celebrities.
All professional tennis players at the mixer are athletes.
If a person at the mixer is a celebrity, then they are well paid.
If a person at the mixer is an athlete, then they are famous.
All well-paid people at the mixer live in tax havens.
Djokovic is at the mixer: if Djokovic is a famous athlete, then Djokovic is well-paid.
Here is a conclusion:
Djokovic lives in a tax haven.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone at the mixer is a Grand Slam champion or an Oscar-nominated actor.
Every Grand Slam champion at the mixer is a professional tennis player.
All Oscar-nominated actors at the mixer are celebrities.
All professional tennis players at the mixer are athletes.
If a person at the mixer is a celebrity, then they are well paid.
If a person at the mixer is an athlete, then they are famous.
All well-paid people at the mixer live in tax havens.
Djokovic is at the mixer: if Djokovic is a famous athlete, then Djokovic is well-paid.
Here is a conclusion:
Djokovic does not live in a tax haven.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Diamond Mine is a professional wrestling stable formed in WWE.
Roderick Strong leads Diamond Mine.
Diamond Mine includes the Creed Brothers and Ivy Nile.
Imperium has a feud with Diamond Mine.
Here is a conclusion:
Roderick Strong leads a professional wrestling stable.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Diamond Mine is a professional wrestling stable formed in WWE.
Roderick Strong leads Diamond Mine.
Diamond Mine includes the Creed Brothers and Ivy Nile.
Imperium has a feud with Diamond Mine.
Here is a conclusion:
Roderick Strong leads the Creed Brothers.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Diamond Mine is a professional wrestling stable formed in WWE.
Roderick Strong leads Diamond Mine.
Diamond Mine includes the Creed Brothers and Ivy Nile.
Imperium has a feud with Diamond Mine.
Here is a conclusion:
Imperium doesn't have a feud with a professional wrestling stable that includes Ivy Nile.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Symphony No. 9 is a music piece.
Composers write music pieces.
Beethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society is an orchestra.
Beethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.
Orchestras are led by conductors.
Here is a conclusion:
Beethoven is a composer.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Symphony No. 9 is a music piece.
Composers write music pieces.
Beethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society is an orchestra.
Beethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.
Orchestras are led by conductors.
Here is a conclusion:
Some orchestras premiered music pieces.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Symphony No. 9 is a music piece.
Composers write music pieces.
Beethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society is an orchestra.
Beethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.
Orchestras are led by conductors.
Here is a conclusion:
Beethoven is not a conductor.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All of Zaha Hadid's design styles that Max adores have interesting geometries.
No brutalist buildings that Max adores have interesting geometries.
Every style that Max adores is either Zaha Hadid's design style or Kelly Wearstler's design style.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are evocative.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are dreamy.
If a design by Max that he adores has interesting geometries, then the design is a brutalist building and evocative.
Here is a conclusion:
A design by Max is a brutalist building.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All of Zaha Hadid's design styles that Max adores have interesting geometries.
No brutalist buildings that Max adores have interesting geometries.
Every style that Max adores is either Zaha Hadid's design style or Kelly Wearstler's design style.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are evocative.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are dreamy.
If a design by Max that he adores has interesting geometries, then the design is a brutalist building and evocative.
Here is a conclusion:
A design by Max is evocative and dreamy.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All of Zaha Hadid's design styles that Max adores have interesting geometries.
No brutalist buildings that Max adores have interesting geometries.
Every style that Max adores is either Zaha Hadid's design style or Kelly Wearstler's design style.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are evocative.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are dreamy.
If a design by Max that he adores has interesting geometries, then the design is a brutalist building and evocative.
Here is a conclusion:
A design by Max is either evocative or dreamy.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If someone is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association, then they are one of the most active players in major tennis.
Everyone who lost to Iga Świątek at Roland Garros 2022 is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association.
All female tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 lost to Iga Świątek.
All tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 are either female or male.
All male tennis players at Roland Garros in 2022 lost to Rafael Nadal.
If Coco Gauff is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association or lost to Rafael Nadal, then Coco Gauff is not a male tennis player at Roland Garros 2022.
Coco Gauff is at Roland Garros 2022.
Here is a conclusion:
Coco Gauff is among the most active Grand-Slam players.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If someone is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association, then they are one of the most active players in major tennis.
Everyone who lost to Iga Świątek at Roland Garros 2022 is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association.
All female tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 lost to Iga Świątek.
All tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 are either female or male.
All male tennis players at Roland Garros in 2022 lost to Rafael Nadal.
If Coco Gauff is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association or lost to Rafael Nadal, then Coco Gauff is not a male tennis player at Roland Garros 2022.
Coco Gauff is at Roland Garros 2022.
Here is a conclusion:
Coco Gauff has lost to Rafael Nadal.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If someone is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association, then they are one of the most active players in major tennis.
Everyone who lost to Iga Świątek at Roland Garros 2022 is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association.
All female tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 lost to Iga Świątek.
All tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 are either female or male.
All male tennis players at Roland Garros in 2022 lost to Rafael Nadal.
If Coco Gauff is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association or lost to Rafael Nadal, then Coco Gauff is not a male tennis player at Roland Garros 2022.
Coco Gauff is at Roland Garros 2022.
Here is a conclusion:
Coco Gauff is not both a player who lost to Iga Świątek at Roland Garros 2022 and one of the most active players in major tennis.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All cats are mammals.
Some pets are not mammals.
Here is a conclusion:
No pets are cats.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.
All students who want to have a long vacation have summer as their favorite season.
Emma's favorite season is summer.
Mia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's.
James wants to have a long vacation.
Here is a conclusion:
James's favorite season is summer.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.
All students who want to have a long vacation have summer as their favorite season.
Emma's favorite season is summer.
Mia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's.
James wants to have a long vacation.
Here is a conclusion:
Mia's favorite season is spring.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No digital media are analog.
Every printed text is analog media.
All streaming services are digital media.
If an object is a hardcover book, then it is printed text.
If 1984 is a streaming service, then 1984 is a hardcover book.
Here is a conclusion:
1984 is printed text.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No digital media are analog.
Every printed text is analog media.
All streaming services are digital media.
If an object is a hardcover book, then it is printed text.
If 1984 is a streaming service, then 1984 is a hardcover book.
Here is a conclusion:
1984 is a streaming service.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No digital media are analog.
Every printed text is analog media.
All streaming services are digital media.
If an object is a hardcover book, then it is printed text.
If 1984 is a streaming service, then 1984 is a hardcover book.
Here is a conclusion:
1984 is not a streaming service.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All Romance languages are Indo-European languages.
Romance languages are a language family.
All languages within a language family are related to each other.
French and Spanish are both Romance languages.
German is related to Spanish.
Basque is not related to any other language.
Here is a conclusion:
Basque is a Romance language.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False