Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All Romance languages are Indo-European languages.
Romance languages are a language family.
All languages within a language family are related to each other.
French and Spanish are both Romance languages.
German is related to Spanish.
Basque is not related to any other language.
Here is a conclusion:
German is a Romance language.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All Romance languages are Indo-European languages.
Romance languages are a language family.
All languages within a language family are related to each other.
French and Spanish are both Romance languages.
German is related to Spanish.
Basque is not related to any other language.
Here is a conclusion:
French is an Indo-European language.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Robert Lewandowski is a striker.
Strikers are soccer players.
Robert Lewandowski left Bayern Munchen.
If a player leaves a team they no longer play for that team.
Here is a conclusion:
Robert Lewandowski is a soccer player.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Robert Lewandowski is a striker.
Strikers are soccer players.
Robert Lewandowski left Bayern Munchen.
If a player leaves a team they no longer play for that team.
Here is a conclusion:
Robert Lewandowski plays for Bayern Munchen.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Robert Lewandowski is a striker.
Strikers are soccer players.
Robert Lewandowski left Bayern Munchen.
If a player leaves a team they no longer play for that team.
Here is a conclusion:
Robert Lewandowski is a star.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Billings is a city in the state of Montana in U.S.
The state of Montana includes the cities of Butte, Helena, and Missoula.
White Sulphur Springs and Butte are cities in the same state in U.S.
The city of St Pierre is not in the state of Montana.
Any city in Butte is not in St Pierre.
A city can only be in one state in U.S.  except for Bristol, Texarkana, Texhoma and Union City.
Here is a conclusion:
Butte and St Pierre are in the same state.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Billings is a city in the state of Montana in U.S.
The state of Montana includes the cities of Butte, Helena, and Missoula.
White Sulphur Springs and Butte are cities in the same state in U.S.
The city of St Pierre is not in the state of Montana.
Any city in Butte is not in St Pierre.
A city can only be in one state in U.S.  except for Bristol, Texarkana, Texhoma and Union City.
Here is a conclusion:
St Pierre and Bismarck are in the same state.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Billings is a city in the state of Montana in U.S.
The state of Montana includes the cities of Butte, Helena, and Missoula.
White Sulphur Springs and Butte are cities in the same state in U.S.
The city of St Pierre is not in the state of Montana.
Any city in Butte is not in St Pierre.
A city can only be in one state in U.S.  except for Bristol, Texarkana, Texhoma and Union City.
Here is a conclusion:
Montana is home to the city of Missoula.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
International students in the US have either an F1 visa or a J1 visa.
An international student in the US with an F1 visa needs to apply for CPT or OPT if the student wants to work in the US.
Mike is an international student.
Mike needs to apply for CPT if he wants to work in the US.
Here is a conclusion:
Mike has an F1 visa.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
International students in the US have either an F1 visa or a J1 visa.
An international student in the US with an F1 visa needs to apply for CPT or OPT if the student wants to work in the US.
Mike is an international student.
Mike needs to apply for CPT if he wants to work in the US.
Here is a conclusion:
Mike has a J1 visa.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All Brown Swiss cattle are cows.
Some pets are Brown Swiss Cattle.
All cows are domesticated animals.
Alligators are not domesticated animals.
Ted is an alligator.
Here is a conclusion:
Ted is a pet.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All Brown Swiss cattle are cows.
Some pets are Brown Swiss Cattle.
All cows are domesticated animals.
Alligators are not domesticated animals.
Ted is an alligator.
Here is a conclusion:
Ted is a pet and Brown Swiss cattle
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All Brown Swiss cattle are cows.
Some pets are Brown Swiss Cattle.
All cows are domesticated animals.
Alligators are not domesticated animals.
Ted is an alligator.
Here is a conclusion:
If Ted is a Brown Swiss cattle, then Ted is not a pet.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Yale University is a private Ivy League research university.
Yale University moved to New Haven in 1716.
Yale university's endowment was valued at $42.3 billion.
A list of residential colleges at Yale: Benjamin Franklin College, Berkeley College, Branford College, Davenport College, Ezra Stiles College, Grace Hopper College, Jonathan Edwards College, Morse College, Pauli Murray College, Pierson College, Saybrook College, Silliman College, Timothy Dwight College, and Trumbull College.
Here is a conclusion:
A private Ivy League research university moved to New Haven.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Yale University is a private Ivy League research university.
Yale University moved to New Haven in 1716.
Yale university's endowment was valued at $42.3 billion.
A list of residential colleges at Yale: Benjamin Franklin College, Berkeley College, Branford College, Davenport College, Ezra Stiles College, Grace Hopper College, Jonathan Edwards College, Morse College, Pauli Murray College, Pierson College, Saybrook College, Silliman College, Timothy Dwight College, and Trumbull College.
Here is a conclusion:
Yale University has the largest university endowment of any educational institution.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Yale University is a private Ivy League research university.
Yale University moved to New Haven in 1716.
Yale university's endowment was valued at $42.3 billion.
A list of residential colleges at Yale: Benjamin Franklin College, Berkeley College, Branford College, Davenport College, Ezra Stiles College, Grace Hopper College, Jonathan Edwards College, Morse College, Pauli Murray College, Pierson College, Saybrook College, Silliman College, Timothy Dwight College, and Trumbull College.
Here is a conclusion:
Pierson College is a residential college at Yale.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Badults is a British Sitcom series starring members of Pappy's.
Badults was piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three.
The Working title "The Secret Dude Society" was used for Badults.
Andrew Collins was the script editor for Badults.
Here is a conclusion:
Andrew Collins was the script editor for a series with the working title "The Secret Dude Society".
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Badults is a British Sitcom series starring members of Pappy's.
Badults was piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three.
The Working title "The Secret Dude Society" was used for Badults.
Andrew Collins was the script editor for Badults.
Here is a conclusion:
No members of Pappy's have starred in a show piloting on BBC Two or BBC Three.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All growth stocks are bought to earn profits from rapid price appreciation.
If the stock price is bought to earn profits from rapid price appreciation, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.
Some stocks are growth stocks.
All mature stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.
KO is a mature stock.
Here is a conclusion:
KO is a stock.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All growth stocks are bought to earn profits from rapid price appreciation.
If the stock price is bought to earn profits from rapid price appreciation, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.
Some stocks are growth stocks.
All mature stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.
KO is a mature stock.
Here is a conclusion:
KO is a stock and a growth stock.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All growth stocks are bought to earn profits from rapid price appreciation.
If the stock price is bought to earn profits from rapid price appreciation, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.
Some stocks are growth stocks.
All mature stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.
KO is a mature stock.
Here is a conclusion:
If KO is a growth stock or bought to earn profits from rapid price appreciation, then KO is neither a stock nor is its price volatile.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All vehicle registration plates in Istanbul begin with the number 34.
Plates that do not begin with the number 34 are not from Istanbul.
Joe's vehicle registration plate is from Istanbul.
Tom's license plate begins with the number 35.
If a license plate begins with the number 35, then it does not begin with the number 34.
Here is a conclusion:
Joe's license plate begins with the number 34.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All vehicle registration plates in Istanbul begin with the number 34.
Plates that do not begin with the number 34 are not from Istanbul.
Joe's vehicle registration plate is from Istanbul.
Tom's license plate begins with the number 35.
If a license plate begins with the number 35, then it does not begin with the number 34.
Here is a conclusion:
Tom's license plate is from Istanbul.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If people at Mary's school work in student jobs on campus, then they need to earn money to help pay for their college tuition.
If people at Mary's school order takeout frequently in college, then they work in student jobs on campus.
People at Mary's school order takeout frequently in college or enjoy the dining hall meals and recipes.
If people at Mary's school enjoy the dining hall meals and recipes, then they are not picky eaters.
If people at Mary's school enjoy the dining hall meals and recipes, then they spend a lot of their time eating and catching up with friends in the campus dining halls.
Hannah is at Mary's school.
Hannah works in student jobs on campus and if she needs to earn money to help pay for her college tuition, then she is neither picky nor needs to earn money to help pay for her college tuition.
Here is a conclusion:
Hannah needs to earn money to help pay for her college tuition.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If people at Mary's school work in student jobs on campus, then they need to earn money to help pay for their college tuition.
If people at Mary's school order takeout frequently in college, then they work in student jobs on campus.
People at Mary's school order takeout frequently in college or enjoy the dining hall meals and recipes.
If people at Mary's school enjoy the dining hall meals and recipes, then they are not picky eaters.
If people at Mary's school enjoy the dining hall meals and recipes, then they spend a lot of their time eating and catching up with friends in the campus dining halls.
Hannah is at Mary's school.
Hannah works in student jobs on campus and if she needs to earn money to help pay for her college tuition, then she is neither picky nor needs to earn money to help pay for her college tuition.
Here is a conclusion:
Hannah is at Mary's school and she is not a picky eater and spends a lot of her time eating and catching up with friends in the campus dining halls.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If people at Mary's school work in student jobs on campus, then they need to earn money to help pay for their college tuition.
If people at Mary's school order takeout frequently in college, then they work in student jobs on campus.
People at Mary's school order takeout frequently in college or enjoy the dining hall meals and recipes.
If people at Mary's school enjoy the dining hall meals and recipes, then they are not picky eaters.
If people at Mary's school enjoy the dining hall meals and recipes, then they spend a lot of their time eating and catching up with friends in the campus dining halls.
Hannah is at Mary's school.
Hannah works in student jobs on campus and if she needs to earn money to help pay for her college tuition, then she is neither picky nor needs to earn money to help pay for her college tuition.
Here is a conclusion:
Hannah is at Mary's school and she either is not a picky eater or, if she is, then she spends a lot of her time eating and catching up with friends in the campus dining halls.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No baked sweets are spicy.
All cupcakes are baked sweets.
All mala hotpots are spicy.
All products from Baked by Melissa are cupcakes.
Dried Thai chilies are spicy or mala hotpots or not baked sweets.
Here is a conclusion:
Dried Thai chilies are products of Baked by Melissa.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No baked sweets are spicy.
All cupcakes are baked sweets.
All mala hotpots are spicy.
All products from Baked by Melissa are cupcakes.
Dried Thai chilies are spicy or mala hotpots or not baked sweets.
Here is a conclusion:
Dried Thai chilies are not products of Baked by Melissa.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No baked sweets are spicy.
All cupcakes are baked sweets.
All mala hotpots are spicy.
All products from Baked by Melissa are cupcakes.
Dried Thai chilies are spicy or mala hotpots or not baked sweets.
Here is a conclusion:
Dried Thai chilies are a mala hotpot.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No baked sweets are spicy.
All cupcakes are baked sweets.
All mala hotpots are spicy.
All products from Baked by Melissa are cupcakes.
Dried Thai chilies are spicy or mala hotpots or not baked sweets.
Here is a conclusion:
Dried Thai chilies are neither products of Baked by Melissa nor baked sweets.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No baked sweets are spicy.
All cupcakes are baked sweets.
All mala hotpots are spicy.
All products from Baked by Melissa are cupcakes.
Dried Thai chilies are spicy or mala hotpots or not baked sweets.
Here is a conclusion:
Dried Thai chilies are cupcakes and products of Baked by Melissa.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a restaurant is listed in Yelp’s recommendations, then the restaurant has not received many negative reviews.
All restaurants with a rating greater than four are listed in Yelp’s recommendations.
Some restaurants that do not provide take-out service receive many negative reviews.
All restaurants that are popular among local residents have ratings greater than four.
The Hamden Plaza Subway store has a rating greater than four, or it is popular among local residents.
Here is a conclusion:
If the Hamden Plaza Subway store provides take-out service and receives many negative reviews, then its rating is greater than 4 and it does not provide take-out service.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a restaurant is listed in Yelp’s recommendations, then the restaurant has not received many negative reviews.
All restaurants with a rating greater than four are listed in Yelp’s recommendations.
Some restaurants that do not provide take-out service receive many negative reviews.
All restaurants that are popular among local residents have ratings greater than four.
The Hamden Plaza Subway store has a rating greater than four, or it is popular among local residents.
Here is a conclusion:
The Hamden Plaza Subway store provides take-out service or does not receive many negative reviews.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a restaurant is listed in Yelp’s recommendations, then the restaurant has not received many negative reviews.
All restaurants with a rating greater than four are listed in Yelp’s recommendations.
Some restaurants that do not provide take-out service receive many negative reviews.
All restaurants that are popular among local residents have ratings greater than four.
The Hamden Plaza Subway store has a rating greater than four, or it is popular among local residents.
Here is a conclusion:
The Hamden Plaza store does not provide take-out service.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
In superhero movies, the good guys always win.
The Surprising Adventures of Sir Digby Chicken Caesar is a superhero movie.
Good guys fight bad guys and vice versa.
Sir Digby fights his nemesis.
If a superhero movie is named after a character, that character is a good guy.
The Surprising Adventures of Sir Digby Chicken Caesar is named after Sir Digby.
If somebody wins a fight, the person they are fighting does not win.
If a superhero movie is named after a character, that character is in the movie.
Here is a conclusion:
Sir Digby’s nemesis does not win.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Books contain tons of knowledge.
When a person reads a book, that person gains knowledge.
If a person gains knowledge, they become smarter.
Harry read the book “Walden” by Henry Thoreau.
Here is a conclusion:
Walden contains knowledge.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Books contain tons of knowledge.
When a person reads a book, that person gains knowledge.
If a person gains knowledge, they become smarter.
Harry read the book “Walden” by Henry Thoreau.
Here is a conclusion:
Harry is smarter than before.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Books contain tons of knowledge.
When a person reads a book, that person gains knowledge.
If a person gains knowledge, they become smarter.
Harry read the book “Walden” by Henry Thoreau.
Here is a conclusion:
A smarter person has gained knowledge.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
A natural language processing task can be categorized as either a language generation task or a language understanding task.
If the output of a natural language processing task is a text sequence, then it is a language generation task.
Machine translation is a natural language processing task.
The output of machine translation is a text sequence.
Here is a conclusion:
Machine translation is a language generation task.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
A natural language processing task can be categorized as either a language generation task or a language understanding task.
If the output of a natural language processing task is a text sequence, then it is a language generation task.
Machine translation is a natural language processing task.
The output of machine translation is a text sequence.
Here is a conclusion:
Machine translation is a language understanding task.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Pets are allowed in some managed buildings.
A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.
The security deposit can be either equal to the monthly rent at a managed building or more.
Fluffy is Tom's cat.
Cats are pets.
The Olive Garden is a managed building.
The monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.
$2000 is more than $1500.
Tom will rent an apartment in a managed building if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.
If a managed building allows pets, then people are allowed to move in with a pet.
Here is a conclusion:
Tom will rent an apartment in The Olive Garden.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Pets are allowed in some managed buildings.
A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.
The security deposit can be either equal to the monthly rent at a managed building or more.
Fluffy is Tom's cat.
Cats are pets.
The Olive Garden is a managed building.
The monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.
$2000 is more than $1500.
Tom will rent an apartment in a managed building if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.
If a managed building allows pets, then people are allowed to move in with a pet.
Here is a conclusion:
Tom is allowed to move into an apartment in The Olive Garden with Fluffy.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Pets are allowed in some managed buildings.
A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.
The security deposit can be either equal to the monthly rent at a managed building or more.
Fluffy is Tom's cat.
Cats are pets.
The Olive Garden is a managed building.
The monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.
$2000 is more than $1500.
Tom will rent an apartment in a managed building if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.
If a managed building allows pets, then people are allowed to move in with a pet.
Here is a conclusion:
The security deposit at the Olive Garden is either $2000 or more.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All business organizations are legal entities.
All companies are business organizations.
All private companies are companies.
All legal entities are created under law.
All legal entities have legal obligations.
If the Harvard Weekly Book Club is created under law, then it is not a private company.
Here is a conclusion:
The Harvard Weekly Book club has legal obligations.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All business organizations are legal entities.
All companies are business organizations.
All private companies are companies.
All legal entities are created under law.
All legal entities have legal obligations.
If the Harvard Weekly Book Club is created under law, then it is not a private company.
Here is a conclusion:
The Harvard Weekly Book club has legal obligations and is a private company.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All business organizations are legal entities.
All companies are business organizations.
All private companies are companies.
All legal entities are created under law.
All legal entities have legal obligations.
If the Harvard Weekly Book Club is created under law, then it is not a private company.
Here is a conclusion:
If the Harvard Weekly Book club is a private company, then it either has legal obligations or is created under law.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Animals are either invertebrates or vertebrates.
All animals with backbones reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All vertebrate animals have a backbone.
All bees do not reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All queen bees are bees.
Harry is a bee.
Here is a conclusion:
Harry is a queen bee.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Animals are either invertebrates or vertebrates.
All animals with backbones reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All vertebrate animals have a backbone.
All bees do not reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All queen bees are bees.
Harry is a bee.
Here is a conclusion:
Harry is an invertebrate or a queen bee.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Animals are either invertebrates or vertebrates.
All animals with backbones reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All vertebrate animals have a backbone.
All bees do not reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All queen bees are bees.
Harry is a bee.
Here is a conclusion:
If Harry is either both a vertebrate and an animal with a backbone, or neither a vertebrate nor an animal with a backbone, then Harry is neither an invertebrate nor a queen bee.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
People who are born in a multiple birth with siblings spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings.
If people have siblings who were born together, then they were born in a multiple birth.
If people complain often about annoying siblings, then they have siblings who were born together.
If people live at home, then they do not live with strangers.
If people spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings, then they often live at home.
Luke either is a baby born in a multiple birth and live with strangers, or is not a baby born in a multiple birth and does not live with strangers
Here is a conclusion:
Luke spends a lot of time hanging out and playing with his siblings.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
People who are born in a multiple birth with siblings spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings.
If people have siblings who were born together, then they were born in a multiple birth.
If people complain often about annoying siblings, then they have siblings who were born together.
If people live at home, then they do not live with strangers.
If people spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings, then they often live at home.
Luke either is a baby born in a multiple birth and live with strangers, or is not a baby born in a multiple birth and does not live with strangers
Here is a conclusion:
Luke complains often about annoying siblings.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The folowing is an example:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
People who are born in a multiple birth with siblings spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings.
If people have siblings who were born together, then they were born in a multiple birth.
If people complain often about annoying siblings, then they have siblings who were born together.
If people live at home, then they do not live with strangers.
If people spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings, then they often live at home.
Luke either is a baby born in a multiple birth and live with strangers, or is not a baby born in a multiple birth and does not live with strangers
Here is a conclusion:
Luke is neither born in a multiple birth nor complains often about annoying siblings.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True