Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a restaurant is listed in Yelp’s recommendations, then the restaurant has not received many negative reviews.
All restaurants with a rating greater than four are listed in Yelp’s recommendations.
Some restaurants that do not provide take-out service receive many negative reviews.
All restaurants that are popular among local residents have ratings greater than four.
The Hamden Plaza Subway store has a rating greater than four, or it is popular among local residents.
Here is a conclusion:
The Hamden Plaza store does not provide take-out service.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
In superhero movies, the good guys always win.
The Surprising Adventures of Sir Digby Chicken Caesar is a superhero movie.
Good guys fight bad guys and vice versa.
Sir Digby fights his nemesis.
If a superhero movie is named after a character, that character is a good guy.
The Surprising Adventures of Sir Digby Chicken Caesar is named after Sir Digby.
If somebody wins a fight, the person they are fighting does not win.
If a superhero movie is named after a character, that character is in the movie.
Here is a conclusion:
Sir Digby’s nemesis does not win.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Books contain tons of knowledge.
When a person reads a book, that person gains knowledge.
If a person gains knowledge, they become smarter.
Harry read the book “Walden” by Henry Thoreau.
Here is a conclusion:
Walden contains knowledge.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Books contain tons of knowledge.
When a person reads a book, that person gains knowledge.
If a person gains knowledge, they become smarter.
Harry read the book “Walden” by Henry Thoreau.
Here is a conclusion:
Harry is smarter than before.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Books contain tons of knowledge.
When a person reads a book, that person gains knowledge.
If a person gains knowledge, they become smarter.
Harry read the book “Walden” by Henry Thoreau.
Here is a conclusion:
A smarter person has gained knowledge.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
A natural language processing task can be categorized as either a language generation task or a language understanding task.
If the output of a natural language processing task is a text sequence, then it is a language generation task.
Machine translation is a natural language processing task.
The output of machine translation is a text sequence.
Here is a conclusion:
Machine translation is a language generation task.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
A natural language processing task can be categorized as either a language generation task or a language understanding task.
If the output of a natural language processing task is a text sequence, then it is a language generation task.
Machine translation is a natural language processing task.
The output of machine translation is a text sequence.
Here is a conclusion:
Machine translation is a language understanding task.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Pets are allowed in some managed buildings.
A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.
The security deposit can be either equal to the monthly rent at a managed building or more.
Fluffy is Tom's cat.
Cats are pets.
The Olive Garden is a managed building.
The monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.
$2000 is more than $1500.
Tom will rent an apartment in a managed building if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.
If a managed building allows pets, then people are allowed to move in with a pet.
Here is a conclusion:
Tom will rent an apartment in The Olive Garden.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Pets are allowed in some managed buildings.
A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.
The security deposit can be either equal to the monthly rent at a managed building or more.
Fluffy is Tom's cat.
Cats are pets.
The Olive Garden is a managed building.
The monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.
$2000 is more than $1500.
Tom will rent an apartment in a managed building if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.
If a managed building allows pets, then people are allowed to move in with a pet.
Here is a conclusion:
Tom is allowed to move into an apartment in The Olive Garden with Fluffy.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Pets are allowed in some managed buildings.
A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.
The security deposit can be either equal to the monthly rent at a managed building or more.
Fluffy is Tom's cat.
Cats are pets.
The Olive Garden is a managed building.
The monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.
$2000 is more than $1500.
Tom will rent an apartment in a managed building if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.
If a managed building allows pets, then people are allowed to move in with a pet.
Here is a conclusion:
The security deposit at the Olive Garden is either $2000 or more.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All business organizations are legal entities.
All companies are business organizations.
All private companies are companies.
All legal entities are created under law.
All legal entities have legal obligations.
If the Harvard Weekly Book Club is created under law, then it is not a private company.
Here is a conclusion:
The Harvard Weekly Book club has legal obligations.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All business organizations are legal entities.
All companies are business organizations.
All private companies are companies.
All legal entities are created under law.
All legal entities have legal obligations.
If the Harvard Weekly Book Club is created under law, then it is not a private company.
Here is a conclusion:
The Harvard Weekly Book club has legal obligations and is a private company.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All business organizations are legal entities.
All companies are business organizations.
All private companies are companies.
All legal entities are created under law.
All legal entities have legal obligations.
If the Harvard Weekly Book Club is created under law, then it is not a private company.
Here is a conclusion:
If the Harvard Weekly Book club is a private company, then it either has legal obligations or is created under law.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Animals are either invertebrates or vertebrates.
All animals with backbones reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All vertebrate animals have a backbone.
All bees do not reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All queen bees are bees.
Harry is a bee.
Here is a conclusion:
Harry is a queen bee.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Animals are either invertebrates or vertebrates.
All animals with backbones reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All vertebrate animals have a backbone.
All bees do not reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All queen bees are bees.
Harry is a bee.
Here is a conclusion:
Harry is an invertebrate or a queen bee.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Animals are either invertebrates or vertebrates.
All animals with backbones reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All vertebrate animals have a backbone.
All bees do not reproduce by male-and-female mating.
All queen bees are bees.
Harry is a bee.
Here is a conclusion:
If Harry is either both a vertebrate and an animal with a backbone, or neither a vertebrate nor an animal with a backbone, then Harry is neither an invertebrate nor a queen bee.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
People who are born in a multiple birth with siblings spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings.
If people have siblings who were born together, then they were born in a multiple birth.
If people complain often about annoying siblings, then they have siblings who were born together.
If people live at home, then they do not live with strangers.
If people spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings, then they often live at home.
Luke either is a baby born in a multiple birth and live with strangers, or is not a baby born in a multiple birth and does not live with strangers
Here is a conclusion:
Luke spends a lot of time hanging out and playing with his siblings.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
People who are born in a multiple birth with siblings spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings.
If people have siblings who were born together, then they were born in a multiple birth.
If people complain often about annoying siblings, then they have siblings who were born together.
If people live at home, then they do not live with strangers.
If people spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings, then they often live at home.
Luke either is a baby born in a multiple birth and live with strangers, or is not a baby born in a multiple birth and does not live with strangers
Here is a conclusion:
Luke complains often about annoying siblings.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
People who are born in a multiple birth with siblings spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings.
If people have siblings who were born together, then they were born in a multiple birth.
If people complain often about annoying siblings, then they have siblings who were born together.
If people live at home, then they do not live with strangers.
If people spend a lot of time hanging out with and playing with their siblings, then they often live at home.
Luke either is a baby born in a multiple birth and live with strangers, or is not a baby born in a multiple birth and does not live with strangers
Here is a conclusion:
Luke is neither born in a multiple birth nor complains often about annoying siblings.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
It costs $205 to take the GRE test, which is cheaper than $300.
ETS provides financial aid to those GRE applicants who prove economic hardship.
Those living in single-parent families or having few resources available to them can prove economic hardship.
Tom lives in a single-parent family.
Tom's dad has been out of work, and Tom has few resources available to them.
Tom is applying to take the GRE test.
Here is a conclusion:
ETS provides financial aid to Tom.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
It costs $205 to take the GRE test, which is cheaper than $300.
ETS provides financial aid to those GRE applicants who prove economic hardship.
Those living in single-parent families or having few resources available to them can prove economic hardship.
Tom lives in a single-parent family.
Tom's dad has been out of work, and Tom has few resources available to them.
Tom is applying to take the GRE test.
Here is a conclusion:
It costs below US $300 to take the GRE test.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
It costs $205 to take the GRE test, which is cheaper than $300.
ETS provides financial aid to those GRE applicants who prove economic hardship.
Those living in single-parent families or having few resources available to them can prove economic hardship.
Tom lives in a single-parent family.
Tom's dad has been out of work, and Tom has few resources available to them.
Tom is applying to take the GRE test.
Here is a conclusion:
No one taking the GRE test has financial aid provided to them by something.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If people spill a lot of food on their clothing, then they are not notably tidy.
All clumsy foodies who go out frequently to find new food restaurants to try are people who spill a lot of food on their clothing.
If people are cleanly, then they are notably tidy.
If people value order and spotlessness, then they are cleanly.
All people whose families prioritize order and spotlessness themselves value order and spotlessness.
Peter is either a person who spills a lot of food on his clothing and is cleanly, or a person who does not spill a lot of food on his clothing and is not cleanly
Here is a conclusion:
Peter is notably tidy.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If people spill a lot of food on their clothing, then they are not notably tidy.
All clumsy foodies who go out frequently to find new food restaurants to try are people who spill a lot of food on their clothing.
If people are cleanly, then they are notably tidy.
If people value order and spotlessness, then they are cleanly.
All people whose families prioritize order and spotlessness themselves value order and spotlessness.
Peter is either a person who spills a lot of food on his clothing and is cleanly, or a person who does not spill a lot of food on his clothing and is not cleanly
Here is a conclusion:
Peter is either a  clumsy foodie who goes out frequently to find new food restaurants to try or he is someone whose family prioritizes order and spotlessness.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If people spill a lot of food on their clothing, then they are not notably tidy.
All clumsy foodies who go out frequently to find new food restaurants to try are people who spill a lot of food on their clothing.
If people are cleanly, then they are notably tidy.
If people value order and spotlessness, then they are cleanly.
All people whose families prioritize order and spotlessness themselves value order and spotlessness.
Peter is either a person who spills a lot of food on his clothing and is cleanly, or a person who does not spill a lot of food on his clothing and is not cleanly
Here is a conclusion:
Peter is either both a clumsy foodie who goes out frequently to find new food restaurants to try and issomeone whose family prioritizes order and spotlessness, or he neither is a clumsy foodie who goes out frequently to find new food restaurants to try nor does his family prioritize order and spotlessness.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All fir trees are evergreens.
Some objects of worship are fir trees.
Here is a conclusion:
Some evergreens are not objects of worship.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
The Picuris Mountains are a mountain range in New Mexico or Texas.
Juan de Onate visited the Picuris Mountains.
The Harding Pegmatite Mine, located in the Picuris Mountains, was donated.
There are no mountain ranges in texas that have mines that have been donated.
Here is a conclusion:
Juan de Onate visited a mountain range in New Mexico.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
The Picuris Mountains are a mountain range in New Mexico or Texas.
Juan de Onate visited the Picuris Mountains.
The Harding Pegmatite Mine, located in the Picuris Mountains, was donated.
There are no mountain ranges in texas that have mines that have been donated.
Here is a conclusion:
Juan de Onate visited a mountain range in Texas.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
The Picuris Mountains are a mountain range in New Mexico or Texas.
Juan de Onate visited the Picuris Mountains.
The Harding Pegmatite Mine, located in the Picuris Mountains, was donated.
There are no mountain ranges in texas that have mines that have been donated.
Here is a conclusion:
The Harding Pegmatite Mine is not located in a mountain range in New Mexico.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a man is taller than another man, the taller one can block the other's shooting.
Michael is a man who is taller than everyone else in his class.
If person x is taller than person y, and person y is taller than person z, then x is taller than z
Peter is a man who is taller than Michael.
Michael can block any shooting from a person as long as the person does not jump when shooting.
Michael cannot block Windy's shooting.
Every shooter who can jump when shooting is a great shooter.
Here is a conclusion:
Peter is shorter than a man in Michael's class.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a man is taller than another man, the taller one can block the other's shooting.
Michael is a man who is taller than everyone else in his class.
If person x is taller than person y, and person y is taller than person z, then x is taller than z
Peter is a man who is taller than Michael.
Michael can block any shooting from a person as long as the person does not jump when shooting.
Michael cannot block Windy's shooting.
Every shooter who can jump when shooting is a great shooter.
Here is a conclusion:
Windy is a great shooter.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a man is taller than another man, the taller one can block the other's shooting.
Michael is a man who is taller than everyone else in his class.
If person x is taller than person y, and person y is taller than person z, then x is taller than z
Peter is a man who is taller than Michael.
Michael can block any shooting from a person as long as the person does not jump when shooting.
Michael cannot block Windy's shooting.
Every shooter who can jump when shooting is a great shooter.
Here is a conclusion:
Peter can block Windy's shooting.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Barutin Cove is a cove named after the Bulgarian settlement of Barutin.
Barutin Cove is on the southwest coast of Snow Island.
Snow Island, Greenwich Island, and Deception Island are located in the South Shetland Islands.
Antarctica is located on the South Shetland Islands.
If place A is located in place B and place B is located in place C, then place A is located in place C.
Here is a conclusion:
Barutin Cove is named after all islands in Antarctica.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Barutin Cove is a cove named after the Bulgarian settlement of Barutin.
Barutin Cove is on the southwest coast of Snow Island.
Snow Island, Greenwich Island, and Deception Island are located in the South Shetland Islands.
Antarctica is located on the South Shetland Islands.
If place A is located in place B and place B is located in place C, then place A is located in place C.
Here is a conclusion:
There is at least one cove in Antarctica named after a place in Bulgaria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Barutin Cove is a cove named after the Bulgarian settlement of Barutin.
Barutin Cove is on the southwest coast of Snow Island.
Snow Island, Greenwich Island, and Deception Island are located in the South Shetland Islands.
Antarctica is located on the South Shetland Islands.
If place A is located in place B and place B is located in place C, then place A is located in place C.
Here is a conclusion:
Barutin Cove is not located in Antarctica.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Some affection is love.
Some love is positive.
Here is a conclusion:
Some affection is positive.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If something can transport multiple passengers, then they are not one-seaters.
All Tesla Model 3 can transport multiple passengers.
All single-seat electric cars are one-seaters.
All Solo EV cars are single-seat electric cars.
If John's car is not a Tesla Model 3, then John's car is not a Tesla Model 3 or a single-seat electric car.
Here is a conclusion:
John's car is a Tesla Model 3.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If something can transport multiple passengers, then they are not one-seaters.
All Tesla Model 3 can transport multiple passengers.
All single-seat electric cars are one-seaters.
All Solo EV cars are single-seat electric cars.
If John's car is not a Tesla Model 3, then John's car is not a Tesla Model 3 or a single-seat electric car.
Here is a conclusion:
John's car is a Solo EV.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If something can transport multiple passengers, then they are not one-seaters.
All Tesla Model 3 can transport multiple passengers.
All single-seat electric cars are one-seaters.
All Solo EV cars are single-seat electric cars.
If John's car is not a Tesla Model 3, then John's car is not a Tesla Model 3 or a single-seat electric car.
Here is a conclusion:
John's car is not a Solo EV.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All of Peter's pets that are mammals are also animals.
All monkeys are mammals.
Peter's pets are all either monkeys or birds.
Peter's birds can fly.
All animals that are Peter's pets can breathe.
If Peter's pet can fly, then it has wings.
Rock is Peter's pet.
Rock can fly, or Rock is a bird, or Rock cannot breathe.
Here is a conclusion:
Rock is a monkey.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All of Peter's pets that are mammals are also animals.
All monkeys are mammals.
Peter's pets are all either monkeys or birds.
Peter's birds can fly.
All animals that are Peter's pets can breathe.
If Peter's pet can fly, then it has wings.
Rock is Peter's pet.
Rock can fly, or Rock is a bird, or Rock cannot breathe.
Here is a conclusion:
Rock has wings.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All of Peter's pets that are mammals are also animals.
All monkeys are mammals.
Peter's pets are all either monkeys or birds.
Peter's birds can fly.
All animals that are Peter's pets can breathe.
If Peter's pet can fly, then it has wings.
Rock is Peter's pet.
Rock can fly, or Rock is a bird, or Rock cannot breathe.
Here is a conclusion:
Rock does not have wings.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All people who make wedding plans are people who are engaged.
All people who invite others to come to their ceremony make wedding plans.
Anyone who has a well-attended wedding invites others to come to their ceremony.
Some people that have well-attended weddings have larger families.
If John is engaged, then John does not invite friends to their ceremony and make wedding plans.
If John has a larger family, then either John has a well-attended wedding or invites friends to their ceremony.
Here is a conclusion:
John has a larger family.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All people who make wedding plans are people who are engaged.
All people who invite others to come to their ceremony make wedding plans.
Anyone who has a well-attended wedding invites others to come to their ceremony.
Some people that have well-attended weddings have larger families.
If John is engaged, then John does not invite friends to their ceremony and make wedding plans.
If John has a larger family, then either John has a well-attended wedding or invites friends to their ceremony.
Here is a conclusion:
John does not have a larger family.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All people who make wedding plans are people who are engaged.
All people who invite others to come to their ceremony make wedding plans.
Anyone who has a well-attended wedding invites others to come to their ceremony.
Some people that have well-attended weddings have larger families.
If John is engaged, then John does not invite friends to their ceremony and make wedding plans.
If John has a larger family, then either John has a well-attended wedding or invites friends to their ceremony.
Here is a conclusion:
John is engaged.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All people who make wedding plans are people who are engaged.
All people who invite others to come to their ceremony make wedding plans.
Anyone who has a well-attended wedding invites others to come to their ceremony.
Some people that have well-attended weddings have larger families.
If John is engaged, then John does not invite friends to their ceremony and make wedding plans.
If John has a larger family, then either John has a well-attended wedding or invites friends to their ceremony.
Here is a conclusion:
John neither has a larger family nor does he invite others to his wedding.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Some mammals have teeth.
Platypuses have no teeth.
Platypuses are mammals.
Humans have teeth.
Here is a conclusion:
Platypuses are mammals with no teeth.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Some mammals have teeth.
Platypuses have no teeth.
Platypuses are mammals.
Humans have teeth.
Here is a conclusion:
Platypuses are reptiles.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Some mammals have teeth.
Platypuses have no teeth.
Platypuses are mammals.
Humans have teeth.
Here is a conclusion:
Humans are mammals.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Plungers suck.
Vacuums suck.
Vampires suck.
Space is a vacuum.
A duster is a household appliance that doesn't suck.
Here is a conclusion:
Space sucks.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Plungers suck.
Vacuums suck.
Vampires suck.
Space is a vacuum.
A duster is a household appliance that doesn't suck.
Here is a conclusion:
Space is a vampire.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Plungers suck.
Vacuums suck.
Vampires suck.
Space is a vacuum.
A duster is a household appliance that doesn't suck.
Here is a conclusion:
If something is a household appliance, it sucks.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Machine Learning algorithms can be categorized as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning.
Unsupervised learning algorithms do not require labeled data.
The state-of-the-art text summarization model is trained with machine learning algorithms.
Reinforcement learning is not used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.
The Machine Learning algorithm for training text summarization models requires labeled data.
Here is a conclusion:
Supervised learning is used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Machine Learning algorithms can be categorized as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning.
Unsupervised learning algorithms do not require labeled data.
The state-of-the-art text summarization model is trained with machine learning algorithms.
Reinforcement learning is not used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.
The Machine Learning algorithm for training text summarization models requires labeled data.
Here is a conclusion:
Unsupervised learning is used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a film is appropriate for people of all ages, then children can watch it without guidance from parents.
If a film contains excessive erotic and violent content, children cannot watch it without guidance from their parents.
If a film is rated General Audience, then it is appropriate for people of all ages.
All family-friendly animated films are rated General Audience.
All movies in the Frozen series are family-friendly animated films.
“Hachi: A dog’s Tale” is a film.
“Hachi: A dog’s Tale”  is either a family-friendly animated film or is appropriate for people of all ages.
Here is a conclusion:
"Hachi: A dog's Tale" is rated General Audience.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a film is appropriate for people of all ages, then children can watch it without guidance from parents.
If a film contains excessive erotic and violent content, children cannot watch it without guidance from their parents.
If a film is rated General Audience, then it is appropriate for people of all ages.
All family-friendly animated films are rated General Audience.
All movies in the Frozen series are family-friendly animated films.
“Hachi: A dog’s Tale” is a film.
“Hachi: A dog’s Tale”  is either a family-friendly animated film or is appropriate for people of all ages.
Here is a conclusion:
"Hachi: A dog's Tale" contains excessive erotic and violent content or is in the "Frozen" series or both.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If a film is appropriate for people of all ages, then children can watch it without guidance from parents.
If a film contains excessive erotic and violent content, children cannot watch it without guidance from their parents.
If a film is rated General Audience, then it is appropriate for people of all ages.
All family-friendly animated films are rated General Audience.
All movies in the Frozen series are family-friendly animated films.
“Hachi: A dog’s Tale” is a film.
“Hachi: A dog’s Tale”  is either a family-friendly animated film or is appropriate for people of all ages.
Here is a conclusion:
"Hachi: A dog's Tale" either contains excessive erotic and violent content and is a film in the "Frozen" series, or it neither contains excessive erotic and violent content nor is a film in the "Frozen" series.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Breeding back is a form of artificial selection by the deliberate selective breeding of domestic animals.
Heck cattle were bred back in the 1920s to resemble the aurochs.
Heck cattle are animals.
Aurochs are animals.
Some animals to be bred back resemble extinct animals.
Here is a conclusion:
Some Heck cattle are artificially selected.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Breeding back is a form of artificial selection by the deliberate selective breeding of domestic animals.
Heck cattle were bred back in the 1920s to resemble the aurochs.
Heck cattle are animals.
Aurochs are animals.
Some animals to be bred back resemble extinct animals.
Here is a conclusion:
Aurochs are extinct.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone who can register to vote in the United States can participate in the 2024 United States presidential election.
If someone has United States citizenship, then they can register to vote in the United States.
A person either has United States citizenship or Taiwanese citizenship.
No Russian Federation officials hold Taiwanese citizenship.
Vladimir neither holds Taiwanese citizenship nor is he a manager at Gazprom.
Ekaterina she can register to vote in the United States, or she is a Russian federation official.
Here is a conclusion:
Vladimir is a Russian federation official
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone who can register to vote in the United States can participate in the 2024 United States presidential election.
If someone has United States citizenship, then they can register to vote in the United States.
A person either has United States citizenship or Taiwanese citizenship.
No Russian Federation officials hold Taiwanese citizenship.
Vladimir neither holds Taiwanese citizenship nor is he a manager at Gazprom.
Ekaterina she can register to vote in the United States, or she is a Russian federation official.
Here is a conclusion:
Vladimir is not a Russian federation official
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone who can register to vote in the United States can participate in the 2024 United States presidential election.
If someone has United States citizenship, then they can register to vote in the United States.
A person either has United States citizenship or Taiwanese citizenship.
No Russian Federation officials hold Taiwanese citizenship.
Vladimir neither holds Taiwanese citizenship nor is he a manager at Gazprom.
Ekaterina she can register to vote in the United States, or she is a Russian federation official.
Here is a conclusion:
Ekaterina can participate in the 2024 United States presidential election or is a manager at Gazprom.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone who can register to vote in the United States can participate in the 2024 United States presidential election.
If someone has United States citizenship, then they can register to vote in the United States.
A person either has United States citizenship or Taiwanese citizenship.
No Russian Federation officials hold Taiwanese citizenship.
Vladimir neither holds Taiwanese citizenship nor is he a manager at Gazprom.
Ekaterina she can register to vote in the United States, or she is a Russian federation official.
Here is a conclusion:
Ekaterina can participate in the 2024 United States presidential election or Vladimir is a manager at Gazprom.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone who can register to vote in the United States can participate in the 2024 United States presidential election.
If someone has United States citizenship, then they can register to vote in the United States.
A person either has United States citizenship or Taiwanese citizenship.
No Russian Federation officials hold Taiwanese citizenship.
Vladimir neither holds Taiwanese citizenship nor is he a manager at Gazprom.
Ekaterina she can register to vote in the United States, or she is a Russian federation official.
Here is a conclusion:
It is not true that Ekaterina can register to vote in the United States and Vladimir can participate in the 2024 United States presidential election.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
New Vessel Press is a publishing house specializing in translating foreign literature into English.
All of New Vessel Press's published books are in English.
Neapolitan Chronicles is a book published by New Vessel Press.
Neapolitan Chronicles was translated from Italian.
Palace of Flies is a book published by New Vessel Press.
Here is a conclusion:
Neapolitan Chronicles is an English book.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
New Vessel Press is a publishing house specializing in translating foreign literature into English.
All of New Vessel Press's published books are in English.
Neapolitan Chronicles is a book published by New Vessel Press.
Neapolitan Chronicles was translated from Italian.
Palace of Flies is a book published by New Vessel Press.
Here is a conclusion:
Harry Potter was published by New Vessel Press.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
New Vessel Press is a publishing house specializing in translating foreign literature into English.
All of New Vessel Press's published books are in English.
Neapolitan Chronicles is a book published by New Vessel Press.
Neapolitan Chronicles was translated from Italian.
Palace of Flies is a book published by New Vessel Press.
Here is a conclusion:
Palace of Flies was translated from Italian.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All hydrocarbons are organic compounds .
All alkanes are hydrocarbons
All organic compounds are chemical compounds.
All organic compounds contain carbon.
No chemical compounds contain only one element.
The mixture either both is a chemical compound and contains only one element, or neither.
Here is a conclusion:
The mixture contains carbon.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All hydrocarbons are organic compounds .
All alkanes are hydrocarbons
All organic compounds are chemical compounds.
All organic compounds contain carbon.
No chemical compounds contain only one element.
The mixture either both is a chemical compound and contains only one element, or neither.
Here is a conclusion:
The mixture is an alkane and contains carbon.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All hydrocarbons are organic compounds .
All alkanes are hydrocarbons
All organic compounds are chemical compounds.
All organic compounds contain carbon.
No chemical compounds contain only one element.
The mixture either both is a chemical compound and contains only one element, or neither.
Here is a conclusion:
If the mixture contains only one element or contains carbon, then the mixture is neither a chemical compound nor an alkane.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All humans are mortal.
All Greeks are humans.
Here is a conclusion:
Some Greeks are mortal.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
None of the students who currently work in the library are from the computer science department.
All of the students with part-time jobs offered by the university currently work in the library.
All of the students who are taking the database course are from the computer science department.
All of the students taking a class with Professor David are taking the database course.
All students working in the lab are taking a class with Professor David.
James is a student working in the lab.
James doesn't work in the lab or have a part-time job offered by the university.
Here is a conclusion:
James has a part-time job offered by the university.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
None of the students who currently work in the library are from the computer science department.
All of the students with part-time jobs offered by the university currently work in the library.
All of the students who are taking the database course are from the computer science department.
All of the students taking a class with Professor David are taking the database course.
All students working in the lab are taking a class with Professor David.
James is a student working in the lab.
James doesn't work in the lab or have a part-time job offered by the university.
Here is a conclusion:
James does not have a part-time job offered by the university.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
None of the students who currently work in the library are from the computer science department.
All of the students with part-time jobs offered by the university currently work in the library.
All of the students who are taking the database course are from the computer science department.
All of the students taking a class with Professor David are taking the database course.
All students working in the lab are taking a class with Professor David.
James is a student working in the lab.
James doesn't work in the lab or have a part-time job offered by the university.
Here is a conclusion:
James either takes the database course or has a part-time job offered by the university.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
None of the students who currently work in the library are from the computer science department.
All of the students with part-time jobs offered by the university currently work in the library.
All of the students who are taking the database course are from the computer science department.
All of the students taking a class with Professor David are taking the database course.
All students working in the lab are taking a class with Professor David.
James is a student working in the lab.
James doesn't work in the lab or have a part-time job offered by the university.
Here is a conclusion:
James takes the database course.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If George likes music, he wants to compose.
If George has access to a program, he can compose.
If George can compose and wants to compose, he will compose.
Here is a conclusion:
If George likes music and has access to a program, he will compose.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If George likes music, he wants to compose.
If George has access to a program, he can compose.
If George can compose and wants to compose, he will compose.
Here is a conclusion:
If George will not compose, George can not compose.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
A hawk never swims.
Some birds are hawks.
Here is a conclusion:
All birds swim.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Some show airing at 8 pm on Monday gives out roses on TV.
If a show gives out roses on TV, then the show is an episode of The Bachelor.
The Bachelor portrays the lives of real people.
All shows portraying the lives of real people are reality TV shows.
Breaking Bad is a show.
Breaking Bad is not a reality TV show.
Here is a conclusion:
Breaking Bad is on Monday at 8 pm.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Some show airing at 8 pm on Monday gives out roses on TV.
If a show gives out roses on TV, then the show is an episode of The Bachelor.
The Bachelor portrays the lives of real people.
All shows portraying the lives of real people are reality TV shows.
Breaking Bad is a show.
Breaking Bad is not a reality TV show.
Here is a conclusion:
Breaking Bad is a TV show in which roses are given out on Monday at 8 pm.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Some show airing at 8 pm on Monday gives out roses on TV.
If a show gives out roses on TV, then the show is an episode of The Bachelor.
The Bachelor portrays the lives of real people.
All shows portraying the lives of real people are reality TV shows.
Breaking Bad is a show.
Breaking Bad is not a reality TV show.
Here is a conclusion:
If roses are given out during Breaking Bad, then it is on Monday at 8 pm.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Heinrich Schmidt was a German politician.
Heinrich Schmidt was also a member of the Prussian State Parliament and the Nazi Reichstag.
Here is a conclusion:
Heinrich Schmidt was German or Russian or both.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Heinrich Schmidt was a German politician.
Heinrich Schmidt was also a member of the Prussian State Parliament and the Nazi Reichstag.
Here is a conclusion:
Some German politician was part of both the Prussian State Parliament and the Nazi Reichstag.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Heinrich Schmidt was a German politician.
Heinrich Schmidt was also a member of the Prussian State Parliament and the Nazi Reichstag.
Here is a conclusion:
No politicians are part of the Nazi Reichstag.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If something is a deadly disease, then it comes with a low survival rate.
Severe cancers are deadly diseases.
Bile duct cancer is a severe form cancer.
All Cholangiocarcinoma is bile duct cancer.
Mild flu comes with a low survival rate.
Colorectal cancer is not both a bile duct cancer and with a low survival rate.
Here is a conclusion:
Colorectal cancer is a kind of severe cancer
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain