0.05 or 0.10) indicates weak evidence against\nthe null hypothesis which cannot be rejected, i.e. that the long-run impact of the COOL measure on the price is\nstatistically not different from zero. Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis, 4th edn (Prentice Hall, 2000).\n485 The following import share weights, based on 2014 trade data, have been used: 41 per cent for\nfeeder cattle weighing 90kg or more but less than 200kg (198lb – 441lb) and 59 per cent for feeder cattle\nweighing 200kg or more but less than 320kg (441lb – 705lb).\nWT/DS384/ARB ● WT/DS386/ARB\nBCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]\n\n Long-term impact of the\nCOOL measure on price basis\nP-value484\nFed cattle -0.084 0.002\n10-12 lb feeder pigs -5.875 0.042\n40 lb feeder pigs -23.1563 0.015\nFeeder pigs (weighted average)486 -9.158 -\nFed hogs -0.079 0.000\n\n6.53. The detailed results of these regressions are reported in Annex C. The results are robust to\nalternative specifications and proxies, including those proposed by the United States and Canada.\nAs reflected in Annex C, some regressions for feeder cattle yield statistically non-significant\ncoefficients for the original COOL measure.\n487 We note that the overall COOL impact on the price\nbasis is negative and statistically significant for all weight categories. This impact encompasses\nboth the original and amended COOL measures, the cumulative impact of which is the variable of\ninterest.\n6.3.2.4.2 Mexico's econometric results\n6.54. Table 2 reports the estimated long-term effects of the COOL measures on Mexican price\nbasis for the various weight categories of feeder cattle.\nTable 2: Mexico's price basis econometric results\n Long-term impact of COOL\nmeasure on the price basis\nP-value\n350 lb feeder cattle -0.154 0.000\n550 lb feeder cattle -0.098 0.000\nFeeder cattle (weighted average) 488 -0.121 -\n\n6.55. The detailed results of our estimations for Mexico are reported in Annex C. The results are\nrobust to alternative specifications and proxies, including those proposed by the United States and\nMexico.\n6.3.3 Elasticity-based simulation of the change in export quantities\n6.56. Having estimated the impact of the COOL measure on the price basis, and thus on the\nexport price (i.e. ∆P), we can move to the second step which consists of simulating the\ncorresponding impact of the COOL measure on export volumes using the elasticity of export\nsupply. The elasticity of export supply measures how the quantity of exports responds to changes\nin the export price. In mathematical terms, the ex port supply elasticity represents the slope of the\n\n486 The following import share weights, based on 2014 trade data, have been used: 81.2 per cent for\nfeeder pigs weighing less than 7kg (15lb) and 18.8 per cent for feeder pigs weighing between 7kg and 23kg\n(15lb – 71lb).\n487 We note that Canada provided a rationale, unrebutted by the United States, as to why the original\nCOOL measure resulted in \"muted\" price effects until the adoption of the amended COOL measure. Canada\nexplains in respect of its own calculations that:\nIn the case of the price difference regression for feeder cattle, the problematic issue was that\naround the time of the original COOL measure, U.S. cattle feeding operations responded\nprimarily by cutting back dramatically in offering to buy Canadian feeder cattle. There was much\nuncertainty about the implementation and that meant many feeder cattle that would have been\nexported but for the original COOL measure remained in Canada. Since there was capacity in\nCanada to feed these cattle, the result was that the price did not fall and, given other price\ntrends in the data at the time, the model estimates a positive coefficient rather than a coefficient\nof zero or slightly negative. By 2013, the market had adjusted to the original COOL measure.\n(Canada's methodology paper, Sumner Study, paras. 129-130.)\n488 The following import share weights, based on 2014 trade data, have been used: 40.7 per cent for\nfeeder cattle weighing 90kg or more but less than 200kg (198lb – 441lb) and 59.3 per cent for feeder cattle\nweighing 200kg or more but less than 320kg (441lb – 705lb).\nWT/DS384/ARB ● WT/DS386/ARB\nBCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]\n\nsupply curve and is defined as the ratio between the percentage change in export quantity and the\npercentage change in export price.\n6.57. As explained in greater detail in section 5.2.2.2 489, the impact of the COOL measure on\nexport quantity ( ∆Q) can be estimated as the product of (i) Canada/Mexico's export supply\nelasticity (εe); (ii) Canada/Mexico's export quantity in the baseline period ( Qc); (iii) the change in\nCanada/Mexico's export price caused by the COOL measure, as estimated econometrically ( ∆P);\nand (iv) the inverse of Canada/Mexico's export price in the baseline period (1/Pc):\nc\nce P\nPQQ \n6.3.3.1 Export supply elasticity\n6.58. The only information missing at this stage is the value of Canada/Mexico's export supply\nelasticity. As noted by all parties, export supply el asticity can be expressed as a function of three\nvariables: (i) supply elasticity in the domestic market of livestock ( εs); (ii) demand elasticity in the\ndomestic market of livestock (η); and (iii) the export share of livestock in the domestic supply (ω):\n\n\n\n 1s\ne\n6.59. The level of the export supply elasticity ca n therefore be derived with relevant information\non Canada's and Mexico's (i) export shares in their respective domestic livestock markets and (ii)\nown price elasticities for livestock supply and demand. These parameters are discussed in greater\ndetail below.\n6.3.3.2 Export shares of livestock\n6.60. A key parameter required to compute the export supply elasticity is the export share of total\ndomestic supply. Calculating the export share therefore requires information on the export volume\nin the numerator and the total supply/production in the denominator. We note that computing this\nshare is not straightforward because it requires comparing, in theory, the export and supply of\nhomogeneous categories of livestock. For exam ple, the export share of fed cattle should\ncorrespond to the ratio between fed cattle exported for meat production and the supply of fed\ncattle for meat production. However, trade data do not completely distinguish between fed\nlivestock exported for meat production and those exported for breeding purposes.\n490 Similarly,\ndata on the annual supply of livestock do not distinguish between fed and feeder livestock destined\nfor meat production (as opposed to breeding or other purposes).\n6.61. Each of the parties developed their own a pproaches to estimate the total supply of a given\ntype of livestock (fed/feeder), some of which le ad to different results. As discussed in section\n5.2.2.2, Mexico derives the tota l supply of feeder cattle as the annual beef calf crop using a\nnumber of assumptions, including that only a certain percentage of annual calf production is\neligible for export.\n491 Under these assumptions, Mexico concludes that the export share of feeder\ncattle is 75 per cent. Mexico further explains that altering these assumptions results in export\nsupply elasticities for feeder cattle ranging between 2.82 and 14.77. 492 Alternatively, Mexico also\nconsiders the total cattle population as a measure of Mexico's livestock supply, which results in an\nexport share of 4.4 per cent.493 The difference between an export share of 75 per cent and 4.4 per\ncent results from how Mexico defines total supply in the two cases. In the former case total supply\nis only the estimated supply of the breed that is \"generally\" exported, whereas in the latter case it\nis the total supply of cattle (this includes cattle of different breeds, beef cattle, dairy cattle, and\nnew-born calves as well as cattle born in previous years).\n\n489 See Mexico's methodology paper, Pouliot Study, p. 17, equation (5).\n490 Canada's response to Arbitrator question No. 31, para. 87; Canada's comment on United States'\nresponse to Arbitrator question No. 46, para. 98.\n491 Mexico's methodology paper, Pouliot Study, pp. 18-21.\n492 Mexico's response to Arbitrator question No. 18, paras. 56-60.\n493 Mexico's response to Arbitrator question No. 31, paras. 87-88.\nWT/DS384/ARB ● WT/DS386/ARB\nBCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]\n\n6.62. Canada approximates the total production of fed cattle/hogs in Canada as the sum of\nCanadian slaughter cattle/hogs and exports of feeder and fed cattle/pigs and hogs. 494 Canada\nfurther assumes that the total production of feeder cattle/pigs is equal to the total production of\nfed cattle/hogs under the assumption that the numbers of cattle/hogs slaughtered are roughly\nsteady over time.\n495 The United States proposes two different measures of total production of\nlivestock, namely (a) calf/pig crop production and (b) the sum of livestock slaughter and exports\nof feeder or fed livestock, which yield different estimates of the export share.\n496\n6.63. At the outset, we note the difficulty in estimating the total supply of a given type of\nlivestock without making a number of assumptions. Ideally, one would want to include calf/pig\ncrop production (new born livestock) that are eligible for export and livestock born in previous\nyears that have become eligible to be exported in the current year. However, available data do not\nallow us to have a precise figure for total suppl y defined in this manner. We understand that the\nparties, in deriving export shares for the purpos e of export supply elasticities have approximated\ntotal supply alternatively as: (a) the total population of livestock; (b) the share of the livestock\npopulation that is eligible for export; (c) total new born livestock in a year; or (d) total livestock\ndemand (i.e. total slaughtered plus exported feed er and fed livestock). We also note that the\nparties have not challenged as erroneous any particular way of calculating export shares.\n497 We\nalso stress the importance of ensuring that th e numerator and the denominator of the export\nshare are as consistent and homogenous as possibl e. In light of the foregoing uncertainties, we\ndecide to calculate export supply elasticities as an average across the several export supply\nelasticities that can be derived using the various proposed export shares (as set out in Annex C).\n6.3.3.3 Domestic supply and demand elasticities for livestock\n6.64. The remaining parameters necessary to compute the export supply elasticity are estimates\nof domestic supply and demand elasticities for livestock. While elasticities are usually estimated\neconometrically, all parties suggest, because of data constraints, the use of supply and demand\nelasticity estimates published in peer-reviewed academic literature.\n498 We follow this approach and\nexplain below what sources and which supply and demand elasticities for livestock we use to\nestimate the various export supply elasticities.\n6.3.3.3.1 Short-run elasticities\n6.65. As explained above, we decide to use short-run export supply elasticities on the basis of the\nrelevant counterfactual. As a result, only short-run domestic supply and demand elasticities are\nrelevant to compute the short-run export supply elasticities. We therefore reject all the long-run\nexport supply elasticities values proposed by Canada and Mexico on the grounds that these\nelasticities were computed using long-run US supply and demand elasticities.\n499 We also reject the\nshort-run elasticity for Mexican feeder cattle comput ed by the United States due to an error made\nby the United States in computing the value for Mexico's short-run export supply elasticity for\nfeeder cattle, by mixing the short-run supply elasticity for US feeder cattle with a long-run supply\nelasticity for US feeder cattle.\n500\n6.3.3.3.2 Data availability and proxies\n6.66. All parties note that supply and demand elasticity estimates for Canadian/Mexican livestock\nare not available. As a solution, all parties propose to use US supply and demand elasticity\nestimates as proxies. Canada explains that the estimates of the United States' domestic supply\n\n494 Canada's response to Arbitrator question No. 31, paras. 92 and 95.\n495 Canada's response to question No. 31, paras. 87, 90, 92, and 95.\n496 United States' response to Arbitrator question No. 31; Market Share Data, (Exhibit USA-51); United\nStates' response to Arbitrator question No. 47.\n497 Although the parties do not contest the definition of the export share, Canada and the United States\ndiscussed which type of data to use for its calculation. See Canada's comments on the United States' response\nto Arbitrator question No. 46, para. 98; United States' comments on Canada's response to Arbitrator question\nNo. 46, para. 77.\n498 United States' written submission, para. 44; Mexico's methodology paper, Pouliot Study, p. 18.\n499 Canada's response to Arbitrator question No. 46, para. 223; Mexico's methodology paper, Pouliot\nStudy, pp. 19-21.\n500 United States' response to Arbitrator question No. 18, para. 74 and footnote 99.\nWT/DS384/ARB ● WT/DS386/ARB\nBCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]\n\nand demand elasticities can be used for Canada because production and market conditions are\nsimilar.501 Similarly, Mexico argues that the estimate s of US demand and supply elasticities are\nreliable values of Mexican feeder cattle elasticities. 502 Although it would have been preferable to\nuse direct estimates for Canada's and Mexico's demand and supply elasticities, we agree with the\nparties that using US elasticities is justified by the level of integration of the North American\nlivestock market.\n6.67. All parties refer to Tonsor et al. (2015) which reports short-run and long-run US supply and\ndemand elasticity values for feeder and fed cattle, and for fed hogs published in and/or vetted by\npeer-reviewed academic literature. 503 Mexico refers also to the US demand elasticity for feeder\ncattle estimated in Marsh (2003)504 which is consistent with the long-run elasticity listed in Tonsor\net al. (2015). Additional supply and demand elastici ty values have been proposed by Canada and\nthe United States.505\n6.68. Canada considers the demand elasticity of Canadian fed cattle to be equal to the\nUS demand elasticity for wholesale beef imports reported in Tonsor et al. (2015). Canada also\nuses the US demand elasticity for fed cattle listed in Tonsor et al. (2015) as the demand elasticity\nfor Canadian feeder cattle. 506 The United States contests the use of these values on the grounds\nthat Canada mismatched these estimates reported in Tonsor et al. (2015).507 We note that Canada\ndid not provide any explanations as to why the demand elasticity of Canadian feeder and fed cattle\ncould be respectively replaced by the US demand elasticity for fed cattle and for wholesale beef\nimports. We therefore reject the use of these demand elasticities proposed by Canada.\n6.69. With respect to feeder cattle, the United States also refers to the short-run supply and\ndemand elasticities for Canadian feeder cattle reported in Hamilton (1991).\n508 Canada criticizes the\nuse of the elasticity estimates reported in Hamilton (1991) on various grounds, including the fact\nthat Hamilton (1991) is an unpublished thesis that reports these elasticity parameters from\nanother unpublished report, and the United States did not correctly report the estimates, which\n\n501 Canada's response to Arbitrator question No. 46, para. 222.\n502 Mexico's methodology paper, Pouliot Study, p. 19.\n503 G. Tonsor, T. Schroder, and J. Parcell, \"Economic Impacts of 2009 and 2013 U.S. Country-of-Origin\nLabeling Rules on U.S. Beef and Pork Markets\", Project Number AG-3142-P-14-0054 R0, Final Report\nsubmitted to the USDA Office of the Chief Economist, (26 January 2015) (Exhibit MEX-2, Appendix A to\nAppendix 15).\n504 J. M. Marsh, \"Impacts of Declining U.S. Retail Beef Demand on Farm-Level Beef Prices and\nProduction\", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 85 (November 2003), (Exhibit MEX-2, Appendix\n8), pp. 902-913.\n505 In addition to reporting US supply and demand elasticity estimates, the United States provided a list\nof alternative export supply elasticity estimates for Canadian feeder pigs taken from Wohlgenant, \"Market\nModeling of the Effects of Adoption of New Swine Waste Management Technologies in North Carolina\" (July\n2005), (Exhibit USA-30) (hereinafter \"Wohlgenant (2005)\"); for Canadian fed hogs taken from a study by the\nUSDA Grain Inspection, Packer and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) (taken from Exhibit USA-75 and\nhereinafter \"USDA GIPSA Meat Marketing Study (2007)\"), and from the National Pork Board, \"An Economic\nAnalysis of the Effectiveness of the Pork Checkoff Program\", Final Report (February 2007), (Exhibit USA-76);\nand for Canadian fed cattle taken from Brester et al., \"Evaluating the Impacts of the U.S. Department of\nCommerce's Preliminary Imposition of Tariffs on U.S. Imports of Canadian Live Cattle\", Research Discussion\nPaper No. 34 (August 1999), (Exhibit USA-59) (hereinafter \"Brester et al. (1999)\"). See United States'\nresponse to Arbitrator question No. 46, para. 86.\nCanada raises a number of issues regarding these export supply elasticities, including the fact that\nthese elasticities have been computed using dated export shares. See Canada's comments on United States'\nresponse to Arbitrator question No. 46, paras 92-93. We agree with Canada and discard the export supply\nelasticities listed above on the grounds that: (i) the export shares used are out-of-date in the case of\nWohlgenant (2005), (ii) the assumption used in GIPSA that import supply is twice as elastic as domestic supply\nhas not been substantiated, and (iii) the estimate of the excess supply of Canadian hogs to the United States\neconometrically derived in National Pork Board (2007) is based on a parameter that is not statistically\nsignificant.\n506 Note that Canada reports only the long-run US demand elasticities. Canada's response to Arbitrator\nquestion No. 46, para. 223.\n507 United States comments on Canada's and Mexico's responses to Arbitrator question No. 46, para. 78.\n508 United States' response to Arbitrator question No. 46; S.A. Hamilton, \"The location of the North\nAmerican cattle-feeding industry: a nonspatial modelling approach\", Iowa State University Retrospective\nTheses and Dissertations (1991), (Exhibit USA-80) (hereinafter \"Hamilton (1991)\").\nWT/DS384/ARB ● WT/DS386/ARB\nBCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]\n\nare not based on Canada but on various regions in the United States. 509 We note that the United\nStates did not provide any explanation as to why these elasticity estimates would be more relevant\nor accurate than the elasticities reported in Tonsor et al. (2015), nor what criteria the United\nStates considered to select the elasticities reported in Hamilton (1991).\n510 For this reason, we\ndiscard these estimates proposed by the United States for the purpose of our calculation.\n6.70. With respect to feeder pigs, the United States points to Wohlgenant (2005), which provides\na short-run supply elasticity value for US feeder pigs. Although Tonsor et al. (2015) does not\nreport any supply and demand elasticity estimates for US feeder pigs, it reports the demand\nelasticity of US fed hogs taken from Wohlgenant (2005). Wohlgenant (2005) also reports the\nshort-run elasticities of supply and demand for Canadian fed hogs published in Moschini and Meilke\n(1992).\n511 Canada argues that the elasticities values for Canadian fed hogs taken from Moschini\nand Meike (1992) are extremely small and base d on data from well before 1992 when the\nstructure of the hog industry was different. 512 Instead, Canada proposes to set the supply and\ndemand elasticities for feeder pigs as the produc t of the supply and demand elasticities for fed\nhogs and the ratio between the supply and demand elasticities for feeder and fed cattle. 513 The\nUnited States is of the view that there is no justification for Canada's adjustment of the feeder pigs\nsupply and demand elasticities in order to \"mimic \" the relationship between fed and feeder cattle\nelasticities.\n6.71. We note that Wohlgenant (2005) provides the most recent estimates of the supply elasticity\nfor US feeder pigs and demand elasticity for fed hogs. We also note that the demand elasticity of\nfeeder pigs is the only elasticity for which there is no direct estimate. Wohlgenant (2005)\ncomputes the demand elasticity of Canadian feeder pigs as the product of the demand elasticity for\nCanadian fed hogs taken from Moschini and Meike (1992), and an estimated elasticity of price\ntransmission from the US feeder pigs market to the US fed hogs market. We discard the estimate\nof the demand elasticity for Canadian feeder pigs derived in Wohlgenant (2005) because it is not a\ndirect econometric estimation of the Canadian demand elasticity for feeder pigs. At the same time,\nwe concur with the United States regarding the fact that Canada did not provide any explanation\nas to why the relationship between fed hog and feeder pigs elasticities should \"mimic\" the fact that\nfed cattle elasticities are more elastic than feeder cattle elasticities. In fact, a comparison of the\nestimates of the US supply elasticity for feeder pi gs and fed hogs points to a more elastic supply\nelasticity for feeder pigs than for fed hogs. We therefore reject the idea of \"mimicking\" the\nelasticities for feeder pigs using the relationship between feeder and fed cattle elasticities. Instead,\nwe decide to use the US supply elasticity for feeder pigs provided in Wohlgenant (2005) and set, in\nthe absence of a direct estimate, the demand elasti city for US feeder pigs as the product of the\ndemand elasticity for US fed hogs and the elasticity of price transmission from the US feeder pigs\nmarket to the US fed hogs market estimated in Wohlgenant (2005).\n514\n6.72. Table 3 summarizes the various supply and demand elasticities used in our own calculation\nof Canada's and Mexico's respective short-run export supply elasticities.\n\n509 Canada further argues that the United States did not correctly report the estimates, which are not\nbased on Canada but on various regions in the United States. Canada also argues that these estimates are out-\nof-date. Canada's comments on United States' response to Arbitrator question No. 46, paras. 99-100.\n510 Hamilton (1991) reports two supply and demand elasticities for feeder cattle: one for Western\nCanada (based on US Northern Plain elasticities) and one for Eastern Canada (based on Northeast of the United\nStates)\n511 United States' response to Arbitrator question No. 28, footnote 141.\n512 Canada's comments on United States' response to Arbitrator question No. 46, paras. 94-95.\n513 Canada's response to Arbitrator question No. 46, para. 223.\n514 The elasticity of price transmission from the US feeder pigs market to the US fed hogs market is\nequal to 0.62. See Wohlgenant (2005).\nWT/DS384/ARB ● WT/DS386/ARB\nBCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]\n\nTable 3: Supply and demand elasticity definitions, estimates and sources\nType of elasticity Short-run\nestimate\nSource\nUS supply feeder cattle 0.22 Tonsor et al. (2015); Pendell et al. (2010) 515;\nMarsh (2003)\nUS demand feeder cattle -0.14 Tonsor et al. (2015); Pendell et al. (2010); USDA GIPSA\nMeat Marketing Study (2007)\nUS supply fed cattle 0.26 Tonsor et al. (2015); Pendell et al. (2010); Marsh (1994)\nUS demand fed cattle -0.40 Tonsor et al. (2015); Pendell et al. (2010); USDA GIPSA\nMeat Marketing Study (2007)\nUS supply feeder pigs 0.64 Wohlgenant (2005)\nUS demand feeder pigs -0.32 Arbitrator's own calculation based on Wohlgenant (2005)\nUS supply fed hogs 0.41 Tonsor et al. (2015); Pendell et al. (2010); Lemieux and\nWohlgenant (1989)516\nUS demand fed hogs -0.51 Tonsor et al. (2015); Pendell et al. (2010); Wohlgenant\n(2005)\n\n6.3.3.4 Derived export supply elasticity estimates\n6.73. Based on our decisions above, Table 4 reports Mexico's short-run export supply elasticity for\nfeeder cattle and Canada's short-run export supply elasticities for feeder and fed cattle, feeder pigs\nand fed hogs (the detailed calculations are provided in Annex C).\nTable 4: Mexico's and Canada's export supply elasticities computation\nParameters Mexico's\nfeeder cattle\nCanada's\nfeeder cattle\nCanada's\nfed\ncattle\nCanada's\nfeeder\npigs\nCanada's\nfed\nhogs\nExport supply\nelasticity517\n2.51 2.18 4.93 5.32 23.31\n\n6.3.3.5 Export quantity simulation results\n6.74. With the estimates of the different export supply elasticities and the econometric estimates\nof the effects of the COOL measure on the price ba sis, we can proceed to the actual simulation of\nthe change in export quantities caused by the COOL measure.\n6.3.3.5.1 Canada's export quantity simulation results\n6.75. Table 5 reports the computation and result s of Canada's export quantity simulation for\nfeeder and fed cattle, feeder pigs and fed hogs.\n\n515 D. Pendell et al., \"AJAE Appendix: Animal Identification and Tracing in the United States\", American\nJournal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 92 (5 March 2010), (Exhibit MEX-2, Appendix 12), pp. 927-940.\n516 C. Lemieux and M. Wohlgenant, \"'Ex Ante' Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural\nBiotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin\", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 71(4)\n(1989), (Exhibit CAN-85), pp. 903-914.\n517 The export supply elasticity is computed as [(εs - η ( 1- ω)]/ ω, where εs is the supply elasticity in\nthe domestic market of livestock, η is the demand elasticity in the domestic market of livestock, and ω is the\nexport share of livestock in the domestic production.\nWT/DS384/ARB ● WT/DS386/ARB\nBCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]\n\nTable 5: Canada's export quantity results 518\n Impact of the\nCOOL measure\non price\nExport supply\nelasticity\n2014 baseline\nexport price\n(CAD/head or\nCAD/lb)\n2014 baseline\nexport\nquantity\n(head)\nChange in\nexport\nquantity\n(lb or head)\nFeeder cattle -0.260 2.18 2.05 442,908 -84,293,112\nFed cattle -0.084 4.93 1.55 386,902 -142,724,960\nFeeder pigs -9.158 5.32 63.00 3,893,860 -3,009,397\nFed hogs -0.079 23.31 0.81 420,713 -270,450,240\n\n6.3.3.5.2 Mexico's export quantity simulation results\n6.76. Table 6 reports the computation and results of Mexico's export quantity simulation for\nfeeder cattle.\nTable 6: Mexico's export quantity results\n Impact of the\nCOOL measure\non price\nExport supply\nelasticity\n2014 baseline\nexport price\n(USD/lb)\n2014 baseline\nexport\nquantity\n(head)\nChange in\nexport\nquantity\n(lb)\nFeeder cattle -0.121 2.52 2.42 1,108,009 -65,021,917\n\n6.3.4 Export revenue loss results\n6.77. Having estimated econometrically the impact of the COOL measure on the price basis ( ∆P)\nand simulated the corresponding change in export quantity ( ∆Q), the computation of the export\nrevenue loss is straightforward.\n6.3.4.1 Canada's export revenue losses\n6.78. Table 7 displays the computation and results of Canada's export revenue losses for feeder\nand fed cattle, feeder pigs, and fed hogs.\nTable 7: Canada's export revenue losses\n519\n Impact of\nthe COOL\nmeasure on\nprice\nChange in\nexport\nquantity\n(lb or head)\n2014 baseline\nexport price\n(CAD/head or\nCAD/lb)\n2014 baseline\nexport\nquantity\n(head)\nExport\nrevenue loss\n(million CAD)\nFeeder cattle -0.260 -84,293,112 2.05 442,908 -274.067\nFed cattle -0.084 -142,724,960 1.55 386,902 -278.031\nFeeder pigs -9.158 -3,009,397 63.00 3,893,860 -252.815\nFed hogs -0.079 -270,450,240 0.81 420,713 -249.816\nTotal -1,054.729\n\n518 All export prices are expressed as Canadian dollars per pound, except for feeder pigs whose price is\nexpressed as Canadian dollars per head. All changes in export quantity are expressed in pounds, except for\nfeeder pigs whose change in export quantity is expressed in heads.\n519 All export prices are expressed as Canadian dollars per pound, except for feeder pigs whose price is\nexpressed as Canadian dollars per head. All changes in export quantity are expressed in pounds, except for\nfeeder pigs whose change in export quantity is expressed in heads.\nWT/DS384/ARB ● WT/DS386/ARB\nBCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]\n\n6.3.4.2 Mexico's export revenue losses\n6.79. Table 8 reports the computation and results of Mexico's export revenue losses for feeder\ncattle.\nTable 8: Mexico's export revenue losses\n Impact of\nthe COOL\nmeasure on\nprice\nChange in\nexport\nquantity\n(lb)\n2014 baseline\nexport price\n(USD/lb)\n2014 baseline\nexport\nquantity\n(head)\nExport\nrevenue loss\n(million USD)\nFeeder cattle -0.121 -65,021,917 1.86 442,908 -227.758\n\n6.3.4.3 Overall export revenue losses\n6.80. We note that Canada and Mexico have proposed their levels of suspension in different\ncurrencies. We compute overall export revenue losses in the currencies requested by Canada\n(CAD) and Mexico (USD) to arrive at the levels of suspension the levels of suspension that can be\nauthorized by the DSB.\n6.81. Based on our calculation, the level of nullification or impairment for Canada amounts to\nCAD 1,054.729 million annually.\n6.82. Based on our calculation, the level of nullification or impairment for Mexico amounts to\nUSD 227.758 million annually.\n\n7 CONCLUSION AND DECISION IN RESPECT OF CANADA (DS384)\n7.1. For the reasons set out above, the Arbitrator determines that the annual level of nullification\nor impairment of benefits accruing to Canada as a result of the COOL measure is\nCAD 1,054.729 million. Therefore, in accordance with Article 22.4 of the DSU, Canada may request\nauthorization from the DSB to suspend concessions and related obligations in the goods sector\nunder the GATT 1994 at a level not exceeding CAD 1,054.729 million annually.\n\n7 CONCLUSION AND DECISION IN RESPECT OF MEXICO (DS386)\n7.1. For the reasons set out above, the Arbitrator determines that the annual level of nullification\no r i m p a i r m e n t o f b e n e f i t s a c c r u i n g t o M e x i c o a s a r e s u l t o f t h e C O O L m e a s u r e i s\nUSD 227.758 million. Therefore, in accordance with Article 22.4 of the DSU, Mexico may request\nauthorization from the DSB to suspend concessions and related obligations in the goods sector\nunder the GATT 1994 at a level not exceeding USD 227.758 million annually."},"processing_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-03-15T15:53:45.418563"}}},{"rowIdx":6297,"cells":{"folder_number":{"kind":"string","value":"386"},"case_number":{"kind":"string","value":"386"},"original_filename":{"kind":"string","value":"DS386_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations.pdf"},"new_filename":{"kind":"string","value":"DS386_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations.pdf"},"doc_sequence":{"kind":"number","value":1,"string":"1"},"doc_type":{"kind":"string","value":"Request_For_Consultations"},"doc_type_raw":{"kind":"string","value":"Request for Consultations by Mexico"},"doc_class":{"kind":"string","value":"NUMBERED"},"variant":{"kind":"null"},"part_number":{"kind":"null"},"case_title":{"kind":"string","value":"UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING REQUIREMENTS"},"date":{"kind":"string","value":"22 December 2008"},"header_codes":{"kind":"string","value":"WT/DS386/1; G/L/878; G/TBT/D/34; G/SPS/GEN/893; G/RO/D/7"},"agreement_indicators":{"kind":"string","value":"General Council; Rules of Origin (RO); Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS); Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)"},"complainant":{"kind":"string","value":"['Mexico']"},"respondent":{"kind":"string","value":"['U.S.']"},"third_parties":{"kind":"string","value":"['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan']"},"dispute_stage":{"kind":"string","value":"Implementation & Compliance"},"agreements_cited":{"kind":"string","value":"Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin"},"case_summary":{"kind":"string","value":"The summary below was up-to-date at\n 20 January 2016\n\n\n\t\tSee also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute\nConsultations\nComplaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)\nOn 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provisions in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by the Farm, Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 and the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008, and as implemented through the regulations published as 7 CFR Parts 60 and 65.\nAccording to Mexico, in the case of certain products, the determination of their nationality deviates considerably from international country of origin labelling standards, a situation which has not been justified as necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective.\nMexico considers that the mandatory COOL provisions appear to be inconsistent with the United States' obligations under the WTO Agreement, including:\nThese violations appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico under those Agreements. Moreover, these measures appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico in the sense of Article XXIII:l(b) of the GATT 1994.\nOn 30 December 2008, Canada requested to join the consultations. Subsequently, the United States informed the DSB that it had accepted the request of Canada to join the consultations.\nOn 7 May 2009, Mexico requested further consultations concerning related amendments and measures adopted by the United States after Mexico's initial request for consultations. It also includes any modifications or amendments to the COOL measures, including any further implementing guidance or other documents that may be published in relation to such measures.\nMexico considers that the cited measures appear to be inconsistent with the United States' obligations under the WTO Agreement, including:\nOn 15 May 2009, Canada requested to join the further consultations. On 22 May 2009, Peru requested to join the further consultations. Subsequently, the United States informed the DSB that it had accepted the requests of Canada and Peru to join the consultations.\nOn 9 October 2009, Mexico requested the establishment of a panel. At its meeting on 23 October 2009, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.\n\nPanel and Appellate Body proceedings"},"page_count":{"kind":"number","value":2,"string":"2"},"clean_text":{"kind":"string","value":"UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN\nLABELLING REQUIREMENTS\n\nRequest for Consultations by Mexico\n\n The following communication, dated 17 Dece mber 2008, from the delegation of Mexico to\nthe delegation of the United States and to the Chairm an of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated\nin accordance with Article 4.4 of the DSU.\n\n The Government of Mexico hereby requests consultations with the Government of the\nUnited States pursuant to Articles 1 and 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing\nthe Settlement of Disputes (DSU), Article XXII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994\n(GATT 1994), Article 14 of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement),\nArticle 11 of the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS\nAgreement), and Article 7 of the Agreement on Rules of Origin, concerning the mandatory country of\norigin labelling (COOL) provisions in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 , as amended by the\nFarm, Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 and the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of\n2008, and as implemented through the regulations published as 7 CFR Parts 60 and 65.\n\n In the case of certain products, the determination of their nationality deviates considerably\nform international country of origin labelling standa rds, a situation which has not been justified as\nnecessary to fulfil a legitimate objective.\n\n The mandatory COOL provisions appear to be inconsistent with the United States' obligations\nunder the WTO Agreement, including:\n\n(i) Articles III, IX, and X of the GATT 1994;\n(ii) Article 2 of the TBT Agreement, or, in the alternative, Articles 2, 5 and 7 of the\nSPS Agreement; and\n(iii) Article 2 of the Agreement on Rules of Origin.\n\n These violations appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico under those\nAgreements. Moreover, these measures appear to nulli fy or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico in\nthe sense of Article XXIII:l(b) of the GATT 1994.\nWT/DS386/1, G/L/878,\nG/TBT/D/34, G/SPS/GEN/893,\n\n Mexico reserves the right to raise further factual and legal claims in the course of the\nconsultations.\n\n We look forward to receiving the US Government's response to this request in order to set a\nmutually convenient date for consultations."},"processing_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-03-15T15:53:49.829660"}}},{"rowIdx":6298,"cells":{"folder_number":{"kind":"string","value":"386"},"case_number":{"kind":"string","value":"386"},"original_filename":{"kind":"string","value":"DS386_SEQ02_Request_For_Consultations_Add.pdf"},"new_filename":{"kind":"string","value":"DS386_SEQ02_Request_For_Consultations_Add.pdf"},"doc_sequence":{"kind":"number","value":2,"string":"2"},"doc_type":{"kind":"string","value":"Request_For_Consultations"},"doc_type_raw":{"kind":"string","value":"Request for Consultations by Mexico Addendum"},"doc_class":{"kind":"string","value":"NUMBERED"},"variant":{"kind":"string","value":"Add"},"part_number":{"kind":"null"},"case_title":{"kind":"string","value":"UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING REQUIREMENTS"},"date":{"kind":"string","value":"11 May 2009"},"header_codes":{"kind":"string","value":"WT/DS386/1/Add.1; G/L/878/Add.1; G/TBT/D/34/Add.1; G/SPS/GEN/893/Add.1; G/RO/D/7/Add.1"},"agreement_indicators":{"kind":"string","value":"General Council; Rules of Origin (RO); Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS); Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)"},"complainant":{"kind":"string","value":"['Mexico']"},"respondent":{"kind":"string","value":"['U.S.']"},"third_parties":{"kind":"string","value":"['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan']"},"dispute_stage":{"kind":"string","value":"Implementation & Compliance"},"agreements_cited":{"kind":"string","value":"Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin"},"case_summary":{"kind":"string","value":"The summary below was up-to-date at\n 20 January 2016\n\n\n\t\tSee also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute\nConsultations\nComplaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)\nOn 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provisions in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by the Farm, Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 and the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008, and as implemented through the regulations published as 7 CFR Parts 60 and 65.\nAccording to Mexico, in the case of certain products, the determination of their nationality deviates considerably from international country of origin labelling standards, a situation which has not been justified as necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective.\nMexico considers that the mandatory COOL provisions appear to be inconsistent with the United States' obligations under the WTO Agreement, including:\nThese violations appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico under those Agreements. Moreover, these measures appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico in the sense of Article XXIII:l(b) of the GATT 1994.\nOn 30 December 2008, Canada requested to join the consultations. Subsequently, the United States informed the DSB that it had accepted the request of Canada to join the consultations.\nOn 7 May 2009, Mexico requested further consultations concerning related amendments and measures adopted by the United States after Mexico's initial request for consultations. It also includes any modifications or amendments to the COOL measures, including any further implementing guidance or other documents that may be published in relation to such measures.\nMexico considers that the cited measures appear to be inconsistent with the United States' obligations under the WTO Agreement, including:\nOn 15 May 2009, Canada requested to join the further consultations. On 22 May 2009, Peru requested to join the further consultations. Subsequently, the United States informed the DSB that it had accepted the requests of Canada and Peru to join the consultations.\nOn 9 October 2009, Mexico requested the establishment of a panel. At its meeting on 23 October 2009, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.\n\nPanel and Appellate Body proceedings"},"page_count":{"kind":"number","value":2,"string":"2"},"clean_text":{"kind":"string","value":"UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN\nLABELLING REQUIREMENTS\n\nRequest for Consultations by Mexico\n\nAddendum\n\n The following communication, dated 7 May 20 09, from the delegation of Mexico to the\ndelegation of the United States and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in\naccordance with Article 4.4 of the DSU.\n\n The Government of Mexico hereby requests c onsultations with the Government of the United\nStates pursuant to Articles 1 and 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the\nSettlement of Disputes (DSU), Article XXII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994\n(GATT 1994), Article 14 of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement),\nArticle 11 of the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures\n(SPS Agreement), and Article 7 of the Agreement on Rules of Origin , concerning measures affecting\ncountry of origin labelling rules applied by the G overnment of the United States pursuant to or in\nconnection with the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provisions in the Agricultural\nMarketing Act of 1946, as amended by the Farm, Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 and the\nFood, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008, and as implemented through the regulations published as\n7 CFR Parts 60 and 65.\n\n This request supplements Mexico's prior re quest for consultations dated 17 December 2008\n() concerning the COOL measures, as a result of which consultations were held on\n27 February 2009.\n\n This supplement request concerns related am endments and measures adopted by the United\nStates after Mexico's initial request for consultations: Mandatory Country of Origin Labelling of\nBeef, Pork, Lamb, Chicken, Goat Meat, Wild and Farm-Raised Fish and Shellfish, Perishable\nAgricultural Commodities, Peanuts, Pecans, Ginseng, and Macadamia Nuts – Final Rule 74\nFed. Reg. 2658 (15 January 2009); Letter from Thom as Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture (United\nStates Department of Agriculture, USDA) to Indus try Representatives (20 February 2009), cited in a\nUSDA News Release: Release No. 0045.09, \"V ilsack Announces Implementation of Country of\nOrigin Labeling Law\" (20 February 2009); and in public statements made by Secretary Vilsack,\nrelated directives and administrative guidance.\nWT/DS386/1/Add.1, G/L/878/Add.1,\nG/TBT/D/34/Add.1, G/SPS/GEN/893/Add.1,\n\n This request also includes any modificati ons or amendments to the COOL measures,\nincluding any further implementing guidance or other documents that may be published in relation to\nsuch measures.\n\n The above measures appear to be inconsistent with the United States' obligations under the\nWTO Agreement, including:\n\n (i) Articles III, IX, and X of the GATT 1994;\n\n (ii) Articles 2 and 12 of the TBT Agreement, or, in the alternative, Articles 2, 5 and 7 of\nthe SPS Agreement; and\n\n (iii) Article 2 of the Agreement on Rules of Origin.\n\n These measures appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico under the\nabove-mentioned Agreements. Moreover, these measur es appear to nullify or impair the benefits\naccruing to Mexico in the sense of Article XXIII:1(b) of the GATT 1994.\n\n Mexico reserves the right to raise further factual and legal claims in the course of the\nconsultations.\n\n We look forward to receiving the US Government's response to this request in order to set a\nmutually convenient date for consultations."},"processing_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-03-15T15:53:49.830515"}}},{"rowIdx":6299,"cells":{"folder_number":{"kind":"string","value":"386"},"case_number":{"kind":"string","value":"386"},"original_filename":{"kind":"string","value":"DS386_SEQ03_Request_To_Join_Consultations_00.pdf"},"new_filename":{"kind":"string","value":"DS386_SEQ03_Request_To_Join_Consultations_00.pdf"},"doc_sequence":{"kind":"number","value":3,"string":"3"},"doc_type":{"kind":"string","value":"Request_To_Join_Consultations"},"doc_type_raw":{"kind":"string","value":"Request to Join Consultations Communication from Canada"},"doc_class":{"kind":"string","value":"NUMBERED"},"variant":{"kind":"null"},"part_number":{"kind":"number","value":0,"string":"0"},"case_title":{"kind":"string","value":"UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING REQUIREMENTS"},"date":{"kind":"string","value":"7 January 2009"},"header_codes":{"kind":"string","value":"WT/DS386/2"},"agreement_indicators":{"kind":"string","value":""},"complainant":{"kind":"string","value":"['Mexico']"},"respondent":{"kind":"string","value":"['U.S.']"},"third_parties":{"kind":"string","value":"['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan']"},"dispute_stage":{"kind":"string","value":"Implementation & Compliance"},"agreements_cited":{"kind":"string","value":"Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin"},"case_summary":{"kind":"string","value":"The summary below was up-to-date at\n 20 January 2016\n\n\n\t\tSee also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute\nConsultations\nComplaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)\nOn 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provisions in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by the Farm, Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 and the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008, and as implemented through the regulations published as 7 CFR Parts 60 and 65.\nAccording to Mexico, in the case of certain products, the determination of their nationality deviates considerably from international country of origin labelling standards, a situation which has not been justified as necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective.\nMexico considers that the mandatory COOL provisions appear to be inconsistent with the United States' obligations under the WTO Agreement, including:\nThese violations appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico under those Agreements. Moreover, these measures appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico in the sense of Article XXIII:l(b) of the GATT 1994.\nOn 30 December 2008, Canada requested to join the consultations. Subsequently, the United States informed the DSB that it had accepted the request of Canada to join the consultations.\nOn 7 May 2009, Mexico requested further consultations concerning related amendments and measures adopted by the United States after Mexico's initial request for consultations. It also includes any modifications or amendments to the COOL measures, including any further implementing guidance or other documents that may be published in relation to such measures.\nMexico considers that the cited measures appear to be inconsistent with the United States' obligations under the WTO Agreement, including:\nOn 15 May 2009, Canada requested to join the further consultations. On 22 May 2009, Peru requested to join the further consultations. Subsequently, the United States informed the DSB that it had accepted the requests of Canada and Peru to join the consultations.\nOn 9 October 2009, Mexico requested the establishment of a panel. At its meeting on 23 October 2009, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.\n\nPanel and Appellate Body proceedings"},"page_count":{"kind":"number","value":1,"string":"1"},"clean_text":{"kind":"string","value":"UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN\nLABELLING REQUIREMENTS\n\nRequest to Join Consultations\n\nCommunication from Canada\n\n The following communication, dated 30 Dece mber 2008, from the delegation of Canada to\nthe delegation of the United States, the delegation of Mexico and to the Chairman of the Dispute\nSettlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.11 of the DSU.\n\n I have been instructed by my authorities to notify you that, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the\nUnderstanding on Rules and Procedures Governi ng the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), the\nGovernment of Canada wishes to join the consulta tions requested by Mexico in the communication\ncirculated to WTO Members on 22 December 2008 () entitled . We make this request in light of Canada's substantial\ntrade interest in this dispute and Canada's request for consultations with the United States regarding\nthese Country of Origin Labelling requirements ()."},"processing_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-03-15T15:53:49.830889"}}}],"truncated":false,"partial":false},"paginationData":{"pageIndex":62,"numItemsPerPage":100,"numTotalItems":9414,"offset":6200,"length":100}},"jwt":"eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSJ9.eyJyZWFkIjp0cnVlLCJwZXJtaXNzaW9ucyI6eyJyZXBvLmNvbnRlbnQucmVhZCI6dHJ1ZX0sImlhdCI6MTc3OTYxMDkxMiwic3ViIjoiL2RhdGFzZXRzL2RlYW4yMjAyOS9XVE9fRG9jcyIsImV4cCI6MTc3OTYxNDUxMiwiaXNzIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9odWdnaW5nZmFjZS5jbyJ9.duIeJed6ZxyZYqePRs1Ij6O3hyqvD_ra0tb2dT88EeFEIoAbTDLHC9DZUqG1_0Xi16VAAqCDAucie9tS81CbBQ","displayUrls":true,"splitSizeSummaries":[{"config":"default","split":"train","numRows":9414,"numBytesParquet":235278256}]},"discussionsStats":{"closed":0,"open":1,"total":1},"fullWidth":true,"hasGatedAccess":true,"hasFullAccess":true,"isEmbedded":false,"savedQueries":{"community":[],"user":[]}}">
folder_number stringclasses 626
values | case_number stringclasses 626
values | original_filename stringlengths 23 61 | new_filename stringlengths 23 61 | doc_sequence int32 1 277 | doc_type stringclasses 42
values | doc_type_raw stringlengths 0 1.4k | doc_class stringclasses 5
values | variant stringclasses 4
values | part_number int32 0 42 ⌀ | case_title stringlengths 0 1.38k | date stringdate 1995-01-13 00:00:00 2025-04-14 00:00:00 ⌀ | header_codes stringlengths 0 267 | agreement_indicators stringclasses 76
values | complainant stringclasses 60
values | respondent stringclasses 63
values | third_parties stringclasses 336
values | dispute_stage stringclasses 7
values | agreements_cited stringclasses 563
values | case_summary stringclasses 617
values | page_count int32 1 1.08k | clean_text stringlengths 67 4.06M | processing_date stringdate 2026-03-15 15:30:25 2026-03-15 16:10:02 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ21_Status_Report_Add12.pdf | DS382_SEQ21_Status_Report_Add12.pdf | 21 | Status_Report | Status Report by the United States Addendum | NUMBERED | Add | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE FROM BRAZIL | 7 December 2012 | WT/DS382/10/Add.12 | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER
MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE
FROM BRAZIL
Status Report by the United States
Addendum
The following communication, dated 6 December 2012, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.739692 | |
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ22_Addendum_Add13.pdf | DS382_SEQ22_Addendum_Add13.pdf | 22 | Addendum | Addendum | NUMBERED | Add | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE FROM BRAZIL STATUS REPORT BY THE UNITED STATES | 18 January 2013 | WT/DS382/10/Add.13 | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER
MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE
FROM BRAZIL
STATUS REPORT BY THE UNITED STATES
Addendum
The following communication, dated 17 Ja nuary 2013, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairperson of the Disput e Settlement Body, is ... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.740378 | |
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ23_Addendum_Add14.pdf | DS382_SEQ23_Addendum_Add14.pdf | 23 | Addendum | Addendum | NUMBERED | Add | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE FROM BRAZIL STATUS REPORT BY THE UNITED STATES | 15 February 2013 | WT/DS382/10/Add.14 | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER
MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE
FROM BRAZIL
STATUS REPORT BY THE UNITED STATES
Addendum
The following communication, dated 14 Febr uary 2013, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairperson of the Disput e Settlement Body, is... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.740924 | |
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ24_Understanding.pdf | DS382_SEQ24_Understanding.pdf | 24 | Understanding | Understanding between Brazil and the United States Regarding Procedures under Articles 21 and 22 of the DSU | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE FROM BRAZIL | 10 April 2012 | WT/DS382/11 | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 3 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER
MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE
FROM BRAZIL
Understanding between Brazil and the United States
Regarding Procedures under Articles 21 and 22 of the DSU
The following communication, dated 3 Apr il 2012, from the delegation of Brazil and... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.742397 | |
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ25_Communication_01.pdf | DS382_SEQ25_Communication_01.pdf | 25 | Communication | COMMUNICATION FROM | NUMBERED | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE FROM BRAZIL JOINT COMMUNICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES AND BRAZIL | 18 February 2013 | WT/DS382/12 | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 2 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND
OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE
FROM BRAZIL
JOINT COMMUNICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES AND BRAZIL
The following communication, dated 14 Februa ry 2013, from the delegation of the
United States and the delegation of Brazil, is circulated a... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.743227 | |
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ26_Executive_Summary_02.pdf | DS382_SEQ26_Executive_Summary_02.pdf | 26 | Executive_Summary | WT/DS382/R Page A-1 BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]] ANNEX A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE FIRST WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES Contents Page | NUMBERED | null | 2 | null | WT/DS382/R | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 24 | BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]]
ANNEX A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE FIRST WRITTEN
SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES
Contents Page
Annex A-1 Executive Summary of the First Written Submission of Brazil A-2
Annex A-2 Executive Summary of the First Written Submission of the
United States A-8
Annex A-3 Executive Summary of Brazil... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.756807 | ||
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ27_Executive_Summary_03.pdf | DS382_SEQ27_Executive_Summary_03.pdf | 27 | Executive_Summary | Executive Summary | NUMBERED | null | 3 | null | WT/DS382/R | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 22 | BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]]
ANNEX B
THIRD PARTIES' WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OR
EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES THEREOF
Contents Page
Annex B-1 Third Party Written Submission of Argentina B-2
Annex B-2 Executive Summary of the Third Party Written Submission of the
European Union B-6
Annex B-3 Executive Summary of the Third Party... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.767965 | ||
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ28_Submission_04.pdf | DS382_SEQ28_Submission_04.pdf | 28 | Submission | WT/DS382/R Page C-1 BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]] ANNEX C ORAL STATEMENTS OR EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES THEREOF OF THE PARTIES AT THE FIRST SUBSTANTIVE MEETING OF THE PANEL | NUMBERED | null | 4 | null | WT/DS382/R | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 20 | BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]]
ANNEX C
ORAL STATEMENTS OR EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES THEREOF OF
THE PARTIES AT THE FIRST SUBSTANTIVE
MEETING OF THE PANEL
Contents Page
Annex C-1 Executive Summary of the Opening Statement of Brazil at the First
Meeting of the Panel C-2
Annex C-2 Executive Summary of the Open ing Statement... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.780322 | ||
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ29_Submission_05.pdf | DS382_SEQ29_Submission_05.pdf | 29 | Submission | WT/DS382/R Page D-1 BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]] ANNEX D ORAL STATEMENTS OF THIRD PARTIES OR EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES THEREOF Contents Page | NUMBERED | null | 5 | null | WT/DS382/R | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 14 | BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]]
ANNEX D
ORAL STATEMENTS OF THIRD PARTIES OR
EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES THEREOF
Contents Page
Annex D-1 Third Party Oral Statement of the European Union D-2
Annex D-2 Executive Summary of the Third Party Oral Statement of Japan D-4
Annex D-3 Third Party Oral Statement of Korea D-9
BCI delet... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.787152 | ||
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ30_Executive_Summary_06.pdf | DS382_SEQ30_Executive_Summary_06.pdf | 30 | Executive_Summary | WT/DS382/R Page E-1 BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]] ANNEX E EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES OF THE SECOND WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES Contents Page Annex E-1 Executive Summary of the Second Written Submission of Brazil E-2 | NUMBERED | null | 6 | null | WT/DS382/R | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 16 | BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]]
ANNEX E
EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES OF THE SECOND WRITTEN
SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES
Contents Page
Annex E-1 Executive Summary of the Second Written Submission of Brazil E-2
Annex E-2 Executive Summary of the Second Written Submission of
the United States E-9
BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.797617 | ||
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ31_Executive_Summary_07.pdf | DS382_SEQ31_Executive_Summary_07.pdf | 31 | Executive_Summary | WT/DS382/R Page F-1 BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]] ANNEX F EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES OF THE PARTIES' STATEMENTS AT THE SECOND SUBSTANTIVE MEETING OF THE PANEL Contents Page Annex F-1 Executive Summary of the Oral Opening Statement of Brazil F-2 | NUMBERED | null | 7 | null | WT/DS382/R | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 16 | BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]]
ANNEX F
EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES OF THE PARTIES' STATEMENTS AT THE
SECOND SUBSTANTIVE MEETING OF THE PANEL
Contents Page
Annex F-1 Executive Summary of the Oral Opening Statement of Brazil F-2
Annex F-2 Executive Summary of the Oral Opening Statement of
the United States F-9
BCI deleted,... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.808309 | ||
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ32_Request_For_Consultations_08.pdf | DS382_SEQ32_Request_For_Consultations_08.pdf | 32 | Request_For_Consultations | WT/DS382/R Page G-1 BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]] ANNEX G REQUESTS FOR CONSULTATIONS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PANEL Contents Page Annex G-1 Request for Consultations by Brazil G-2 | NUMBERED | null | 8 | null | WT/DS382/R | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 10 | BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]]
ANNEX G
REQUESTS FOR CONSULTATIONS AND THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A PANEL
Contents Page
Annex G-1 Request for Consultations by Brazil G-2
Annex G-2 Request for Consulta tions by Brazil - Addendum G-4
Annex G-3 Request for the Establis hment of a Panel by Brazil G-7
BCI deleted, as indicat... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.811835 | ||
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ33_Request_For_Consultations.pdf | DS382_SEQ33_Request_For_Consultations.pdf | 33 | Request_For_Consultations | Request for Consultations by Brazil Addendum | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE FROM BRAZIL | 27 May 2009 | WT/DS382/1/Add.1; G/L/872/Add.1; G/ADP/D75/1/Add.1 | Anti-Dumping Practices (ADP); General Council | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 2 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER
MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE
FROM BRAZIL
Request for Consultations by Brazil
Addendum
The following communication, dated 22 May 2 009, from the delegation of Brazil to the
delegation of the United States and to the Chairman of the ... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.813126 |
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ34_Report_Of_Panel.pdf | DS382_SEQ34_Report_Of_Panel.pdf | 34 | Report_Of_Panel | Panel Report Action by the Dispute Settlement Body | PANEL_REPORT | null | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE FROM BRAZIL | 20 June 2011 | WT/DS382/8; WT/DS382/R | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER
MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE
FROM BRAZIL
Panel Report
Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
At its meeting on 17 June 2011, the Disput e Settlement Body adopted the Panel report on
ÉTATS-UNIS - REEXAMENS ADMINISTRATIFS ANTIDUMPING... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.813649 | |
382 | 382 | DS382_SEQ35_Report_Of_Panel_01.pdf | DS382_SEQ35_Report_Of_Panel_01.pdf | 35 | Report_Of_Panel | Report of the Panel BCI DELETED, AS INDICATED [[XX]] | PANEL_REPORT | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE FROM BRAZIL | 25 March 2011 | WT/DS382/R | ['Brazil'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'Taiwan', 'Thailand'] | Mutually Agreed Solution | Art. 2.1, 2.4.2, 2.4, 2 Anti-dumpingArt. VI:1, VI:2, II:1 GATT 1994Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade OrganizationArt. 9.3 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
13 March 2013
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Brazil.
On 27 November 2008, Brazil requested consultations with regard to:
Brazil is concerned that these laws, regulations, administrative procedures, practices an... | 85 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEWS AND OTHER MEASURES RELATED TO
IMPORTS OF CERTAIN ORANGE JUICE
FROM BRAZIL
Report of the Panel
BCI DELETED, AS INDICATED
[[XX]]
BCI deleted, as indicated [[XX]]
I. INTRODUCTION
1.1 On 27 November 2008, the Government of Brazil ("Brazil") requested consultations wit... | 2026-03-15T15:53:23.868566 | |
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations_01.pdf | DS383_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations_01.pdf | 1 | Request_For_Consultations | Request for Consultations by Thailand | NUMBERED | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND | 1 December 2008 | WT/DS383/1; G/L/873; G/ADP/D76/1 | Anti-Dumping Practices (ADP); General Council | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 2 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE
RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND
Request for Consultations by Thailand
The following communication, dated 26 Novemb er 2008, from the delegation of Thailand to
the delegation of the United States and to the Chairm an of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.152403 |
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ02_Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel.pdf | DS383_SEQ02_Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel.pdf | 2 | Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel | Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Thailand | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND | 10 March 2009 | WT/DS383/2 | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 3 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE
RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND
Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Thailand
The following communication, dated 9 March 2009, from the delegation of Thailand to the
Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 6.2 of the DS... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.154018 | |
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ03_Note_By_Secretariat.pdf | DS383_SEQ03_Note_By_Secretariat.pdf | 3 | Note_By_Secretariat | Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Thailand Note by the Secretariat | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND | 25 August 2009 | WT/DS383/3; WT/DS383/2; WT/DS383/2 | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE
RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND
Constitution of the Panel Established at the Request of Thailand
Note by the Secretariat
1. At its meeting on 20 March 2009, the Disput e Settlement Body (DSB ) established a panel
pursuant to the request of Thailand in documen t... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.154385 | |
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ04_Agreed_Procedures.pdf | DS383_SEQ04_Agreed_Procedures.pdf | 4 | Agreed_Procedures | Agreement on Procedures between Thailand and the United States | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND | 12 January 2010 | WT/DS383/4 | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 6 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE
RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND
Agreement on Procedures between Thailand and the United States
The following communication, dated 7 January 2010, from the delegation of Thailand and the
delegation of the United States to the Chairman of th e Dispute Settlement ... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.156977 | |
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ05_Agreement_Art_21_3.pdf | DS383_SEQ05_Agreement_Art_21_3.pdf | 5 | Agreement_Art_21_3 | Agreement under Article 21.3(b) of the DSU | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND | 6 April 2010 | WT/DS383/6 | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE
RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND
Agreement under Article 21.3(b) of the DSU
The following communication, dated 31 March 2010, from the delegation of Thailand and the
delegation of the United States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.157403 | |
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ06_Executive_Summary_02.pdf | DS383_SEQ06_Executive_Summary_02.pdf | 6 | Executive_Summary | Executive Summary | NUMBERED | null | 2 | null | WT/DS383/R | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 8 | ANNEX B
THIRD PARTIES WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OR EXECUTIVE
SUMMARIES THEREOF
Contents Page
Annex B-1 Third Party Written Submissi on of the European Communities B-2
Annex B-2 Third Party Written Submission of Japan B-5
Annex B-3 Executive Summary of the Third Party Written Submission of
Argentina B-6
ANNEX B-1
THIRD PA... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.161351 | ||
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ07_Questions_And_Replies_03.pdf | DS383_SEQ07_Questions_And_Replies_03.pdf | 7 | Questions_And_Replies | WT/DS383/R Page C-1 ANNEX C QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Contents Page Annex C-1 Thailand's response to the Panel's Question C-2 | NUMBERED | null | 3 | null | WT/DS383/R | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 4 | ANNEX C
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Contents Page
Annex C-1 Thailand's response to the Panel's Question C-2
ANNEX C-1
THAILAND'S RESPONSE TO
THE PANEL'S QUESTION
1. Thailand hereby submits its response to the question provided by the Panel to Thailand on
10 November 2009.
Question to Thailand
At para. 10 of its writt... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.162906 | ||
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ08_Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel_04.pdf | DS383_SEQ08_Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel_04.pdf | 8 | Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel | WT/DS383/R Page D-1 ANNEX D REQUEST FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PANEL Contents Page Annex D-1 Request for the Establishm ent of a Panel by Thailand D-2 | NUMBERED | null | 4 | null | WT/DS383/R | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 4 | ANNEX D
REQUEST FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PANEL
Contents Page
Annex D-1 Request for the Establishm ent of a Panel by Thailand D-2
ANNEX D-1
REQUEST FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF A PANEL BY THAILAND
UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE
RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND
Request for the Establishment of... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.164463 | ||
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ09_Report_Of_Panel.pdf | DS383_SEQ09_Report_Of_Panel.pdf | 9 | Report_Of_Panel | Panel Report Action by the Dispute Settlement Body | PANEL_REPORT | null | null | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND | 24 February 2010 | WT/DS383/5; WT/DS383/R; WT/DS383/R | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 1 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE
RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND
Panel Report
Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
At its meeting on 18 February 2010, the Dis pute Settlement Body adopted the Panel report
ÉTATS-UNIS – MESURES ANTIDUMPING VISANT LES
DE DÉTAIL EN PROVENANCE DE THAÏLANDE
Rapp... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.164792 | |
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ10_Report_Of_Panel_00.pdf | DS383_SEQ10_Report_Of_Panel_00.pdf | 10 | Report_Of_Panel | Report of the Panel | PANEL_REPORT | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON POLYETHYLENE RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM THAILAND | 22 January 2010 | WT/DS383/R | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 18 | UNITED STATES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON
POLYETHYLENE RETAIL CARRIER BAGS FROM
THAILAND
Report of the Panel
I. INTRODUCTION
1.1 On 26 November 2008, the Government of th e Kingdom of Thailand ("Thailand") requested
consultations pursuant to Article XXIII:1 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (the
"GATT... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.172368 | |
383 | 383 | DS383_SEQ11_Report_Of_Panel_01.pdf | DS383_SEQ11_Report_Of_Panel_01.pdf | 11 | Report_Of_Panel | WT/DS383/R Page A-1 ANNEX A WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES Contents Page Annex A-1 Written Submi ssion of Thailand A-2 Annex A-2 Written Submission of the United States A-7 | PANEL_REPORT | null | 1 | null | WT/DS383/R | ['Thailand'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'EU', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Taiwan'] | Panel | Art. 2.4.2 Anti-dumping | The summary below was up-to-date at
21 September 2010
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Thailand.
On 26 November 2008, Thailand requested consultations with the United States with respect to the application by the United States of the practice known... | 8 | ANNEX A
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS
OF THE PARTIES
Contents Page
Annex A-1 Written Submi ssion of Thailand A-2
Annex A-2 Written Submission of the United States A-7
I. INTRODUCTION
A. C OMPLAINT OF THAILAND
1. On 26 November 2008, the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand ("Thailand") requested
consultations in accordance... | 2026-03-15T15:53:24.175586 | ||
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations_Add.pdf | DS384_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations_Add.pdf | 1 | Request_For_Consultations | Request for Consultations by Canada Addendum | NUMBERED | Add | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 11 May 2009 | WT/DS384/1/Add.1; WT/DS384/1; G/L/874/Add.1; G/TBT/D/33/Add.1; G/SPS/GEN/890/Add.1; G/RO/D/6/Add.1 | General Council; Rules of Origin (RO); Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS); Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Request for Consultations by Canada
Addendum
The following communication, dated 7 May 2 009, from the delegation of Canada to the
delegation of the United States and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in
accordance wi... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.361057 |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ02_Request_To_Join_Consultations_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ02_Request_To_Join_Consultations_00.pdf | 2 | Request_To_Join_Consultations | Request to Join Consultations Communication from Nicaragua | NUMBERED | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENT | 15 December 2008 | WT/DS384/2 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENT
Request to Join Consultations
Communication from Nicaragua
The following communication, dated 12 December 2008, from the delegation of Nicaragua to
the delegation of the United States, the delegation of Canada and to the Chairman of the Dispute
... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.361636 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ03_Request_To_Join_Consultations_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ03_Request_To_Join_Consultations_01.pdf | 3 | Request_To_Join_Consultations | Request to Join Consultations Communication from Mexico | NUMBERED | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 17 December 2008 | WT/DS384/3 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
Request to Join Consultations
Communication from Mexico
The following communication, dated 12 Dece mber 2008, from the delegation of Mexico to
the delegation of the United States, the delegation of Canada and to the Chairman of the Dispute
Sett... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.362057 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ04_Request_To_Join_Consultations_02.pdf | DS384_SEQ04_Request_To_Join_Consultations_02.pdf | 4 | Request_To_Join_Consultations | Acceptance by the United States of the Request to Join Consultations Mexico and Nicaragua notified the Dispute Se ttlement Body (DSB) of their desire to be joined in the consultations requested by Canada, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the DSU. The delegation of the United States informed the DSB that it had accepted the... | NUMBERED | null | 2 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 18 December 2008 | WT/DS384/4 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Acceptance by the United States of the Request to Join Consultations
Mexico and Nicaragua notified the Dispute Se ttlement Body (DSB) of their desire to be
joined in the consultations requested by Canada, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the DSU.
T... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.362676 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ05_Request_To_Join_Consultations_03.pdf | DS384_SEQ05_Request_To_Join_Consultations_03.pdf | 5 | Request_To_Join_Consultations | Request to Join Consultations Communication from Mexico | NUMBERED | null | 3 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 19 May 2009 | WT/DS384/5 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
Request to Join Consultations
Communication from Mexico
The following communication, dated 15 May 2009, from the delegation of Mexico to the
delegation of the United States, the delegation of Canada and to the Chairman of the Dispute
Settlement... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.363054 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ06_Request_To_Join_Consultations_04.pdf | DS384_SEQ06_Request_To_Join_Consultations_04.pdf | 6 | Request_To_Join_Consultations | Request to Join Consultations Communication from Peru | NUMBERED | null | 4 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 26 May 2009 | WT/DS384/6 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
Request to Join Consultations
Communication from Peru
The following communication, dated 22 May 2009, from the delegation of Peru to the
delegation of the United States, the delegati on of Canada and to the Chairman of the
Dispute Settlement Bo... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.363406 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ07_Request_To_Join_Consultations_05.pdf | DS384_SEQ07_Request_To_Join_Consultations_05.pdf | 7 | Request_To_Join_Consultations | Acceptance by the United States of the Request to Join Consultations Peru and Mexico notified the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of their desire to be joined in the consultations requested by Canada, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the DSU. The delegation of the United States informed the DSB that it had accepted the reque... | NUMBERED | null | 5 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 8 June 2009 | WT/DS384/7 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Acceptance by the United States of the Request to Join Consultations
Peru and Mexico notified the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of their desire to be joined in
the consultations requested by Canada, pursuant to Article 4.11 of the DSU.
The del... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.363916 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ08_Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ08_Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel_00.pdf | 8 | Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel | Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Canada | NUMBERED | null | 0 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 9 October 2009 | WT/DS384/8 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 3 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Canada
The following communication, dated 7 Octobe r 2009, from the delegation of Canada to the
Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 6.2 of the DSU.
On 1 Decembe... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.365164 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ09_Request_For_Decision.pdf | DS384_SEQ09_Request_For_Decision.pdf | 9 | Request_For_Decision | Joint Request by Canada and the United States for a Decision by the DSB | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 22 December 2011 | WT/DS384/11 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Joint Request by Canada and the United States
for a Decision by the DSB
The following communication, dated 21 Dece mber 2011, from the delegation of Canada and
the delegation of the United States to the Chairpers on of the Dispute Settlement Bod... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.365649 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ10_Working_Procedures.pdf | DS384_SEQ10_Working_Procedures.pdf | 10 | Working_Procedures | Notification of an Other Appeal by Canada under Article 16.4 and Article 17 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), and under Rule 23(1) of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 2 April 2012 | WT/DS384/13 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Notification of an Other Appeal by Canada
under Article 16.4 and Article 17 of the Understanding on Rules
and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU),
and under Rule 23(1) of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review
The followin... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.366760 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ11_Communication_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ11_Communication_00.pdf | 11 | Communication | Joint Communication from Canada and the United States | NUMBERED | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 3 July 2012 | WT/DS384/17 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Joint Communication from Canada and the United States
The following communication, dated 28 June 2012, from the delegati on of Canada and the
delegation of the United States to the Presiding Memb er of the Appellate Body Division in this
dispute... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.368474 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ12_Communication_Corr.pdf | DS384_SEQ12_Communication_Corr.pdf | 12 | Communication | Joint Communication from Canada and the United States Corrigendum In the second line of the introductory paragraph, please replace "Presiding Member of the Appellate Body Division in this dispute" with "Chairperson of the Appellate Body". ÉTATS-UNIS - CERTAINES PRESCRIPTIONS EN MATIÈRE D'ÉTIQUETAGE INDIQUANT LE PAYS D'... | NUMBERED | Corr | null | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 10 July 2012 | WT/DS384/17/Corr.1 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Joint Communication from Canada and the United States
Corrigendum
In the second line of the introductory paragraph, please replace "Presiding Member of the
Appellate Body Division in this dispute" with "Chairperson of the Appellate Body".
ÉTAT... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.368921 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ13_Communication_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ13_Communication_01.pdf | 13 | Communication | Communication from Canada | NUMBERED | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 7 November 2012 | WT/DS384/22 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
Communication from Canada
The following communication, dated 31 Octobe r 2012 from the delegation of Canada to the
Arbitrator, is circulated to Members.
Canada confirms its agreement that the awar d, to be issued on Tuesday, 4 December 2012,
s... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.369204 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ14_Understanding.pdf | DS384_SEQ14_Understanding.pdf | 14 | Understanding | ARB-2012-1/26 Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 4 December 2012 | WT/DS384/24; WT/DS386/23 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 70 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
ARB-2012-1/26
Arbitration
under Article 21.3(c) of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes
Award of the Arbitrator
Giorgio Sacerdoti
AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR
Parties:
Canada
Mexico
ARB-2012-1/26
Arbitr... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.403790 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ15_Agreed_Procedures.pdf | DS384_SEQ15_Agreed_Procedures.pdf | 15 | Agreed_Procedures | Agreed Procedures | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA REGARDING PROCEDURES UNDER ARTICLES 21 AND 22 OF THE DSU | 13 June 2013 | WT/DS384/25 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 3 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA
REGARDING PROCEDURES UNDER ARTICLES 21 AND 22 OF THE DSU
The following communication, dated 10 June 2013, from the delegation of the United States
and the delegation of Canada to the Chairperson o... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.405352 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ16_Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ16_Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel_01.pdf | 16 | Request_For_Establishment_Of_Panel | Request for the Establishment of a Panel | NUMBERED | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA | 20 August 2013 | WT/DS384/26 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 3 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA
Request for the Establishment of a Panel
The following communication, dated 19 August 2013, from the delegation of Canada to the
Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Ar... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.407445 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ17_Note_By_Secretariat_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ17_Note_By_Secretariat_00.pdf | 17 | Note_By_Secretariat | Note by the Secretariat | NUMBERED | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL | 10 October 2013 | WT/DS384/27; WT/DS386/26; WT/DS384/26; WT/DS386/25. | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL
Note by the Secretariat
1. At its meeting on 25 September 2013, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) referred these
disputes, if possible, to the original Panel in acco... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.408043 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ18_Communication_02.pdf | DS384_SEQ18_Communication_02.pdf | 18 | Communication | RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL | NUMBERED | null | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 27 March 2014 | WT/DS384/28; WT/DS386/27 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL
The following communication, dated 26 March 2014, was received from the Chairperson of the
Panel with the request that it be circulated to the Dispute Settlement... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.408635 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ19_Notification_Of_Appeal.pdf | DS384_SEQ19_Notification_Of_Appeal.pdf | 19 | Notification_Of_Appeal | RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO NOTIFICATION OF AN APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES UNDER ARTICLE 16.4 AND ARTICLE 17 OF THE UNDERSTANDING ON RULES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES (DSU), AND UNDER RULE 20(1) OF THE WORKING PROCEDURES FOR APPELLATE REVIEW | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 2 December 2014 | WT/DS384/29; WT/DS386/28 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
NOTIFICATION OF AN APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES
UNDER ARTICLE 16.4 AND ARTICLE 17 OF THE UNDERSTANDING ON RULES
AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES (DSU),
AND UNDER RULE 20(1)... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.409976 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ20_Communication_03.pdf | DS384_SEQ20_Communication_03.pdf | 20 | Communication | COMMUNICATION FROM | NUMBERED | null | 3 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY MEXICO COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY | 27 January 2015 | WT/DS384/31; WT/DS386/30 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY MEXICO
COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY
The following notification, dated 26 January 2015, from the Chair of the Appellate Body addressed
to the Chair of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated to Memb... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.411202 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ21_Communication_04.pdf | DS384_SEQ21_Communication_04.pdf | 21 | Communication | COMMUNICATION FROM | NUMBERED | null | 4 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY | 5 March 2015 | WT/DS384/32; WT/DS386/31 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY
The following notification, dated 2 March 2015, from the Chair of the Appellate Body addressed to
the Chair of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circul ate... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.411980 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ22_Communication_05.pdf | DS384_SEQ22_Communication_05.pdf | 22 | Communication | COMMUNICATION FROM | NUMBERED | null | 5 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY | 19 May 2015 | WT/DS384/33; WT/DS386/32; WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY
The following communication, dated 18 May 2015, from the Chair of the Appellate Body addressed
to the Chair of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.412336 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ23_DSB_Action.pdf | DS384_SEQ23_DSB_Action.pdf | 23 | DSB_Action | Action by the Dispute Settlement Body | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS APPELLATE BODY REPORTS AND PANEL REPORTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU | 5 June 2015 | WT/DS384/34; WT/DS386/33; WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW; WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS384/RW/Add.1; WT/DS386/RW; WT/DS386/RW/Add.1 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
APPELLATE BODY REPORTS AND PANEL REPORTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU
Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
At its meeting on 29 May 2015, the Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Appellate Body reports
on United States – Certain Country of O... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.413058 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ24_Note_By_Secretariat_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ24_Note_By_Secretariat_01.pdf | 24 | Note_By_Secretariat | Note by the Secretariat | NUMBERED | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OF THE ARBITRATOR | 24 June 2015 | WT/DS384/37; WT/DS384/36; WT/DS384/36/Corr.1 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION OF THE ARBITRATOR
Note by the Secretariat
1. At the meeting of the Dispute Settlement Bo dy (DSB) on 17 June 2015, the DSB took note
that the matter raised by the United States i... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.413701 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ25_Communication_06.pdf | DS384_SEQ25_Communication_06.pdf | 25 | Communication | COMMUNICATION FROM | NUMBERED | null | 6 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS COMMUNICATION FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION | 11 December 2015 | WT/DS384/39; WT/DS386/40 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
COMMUNICATION FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION
The following communication, dated 9 December 2015, from the delegation of the European Union
to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated at the request of that delegation.
The European Un... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.414962 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ26_Addendum_Add.pdf | DS384_SEQ26_Addendum_Add.pdf | 26 | Addendum | Addendum | NUMBERED | Add | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO REPORTS OF THE PANEL | 20 October 2014 | WT/DS384/RW/Add.1; WT/DS386/RW/Add.1; WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS386/RW. | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 83 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF
ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
REPORTS OF THE PANEL
Addendum
This addendum contains Annexes A to C to the Reports of the Panel to be found in documents
and
•
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX A
WORKING PROCEDURES OF THE PANEL
Cont... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.470765 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ27_Addendum_Add.pdf | DS384_SEQ27_Addendum_Add.pdf | 27 | Addendum | Addendum | NUMBERED | Add | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES DECISIONS BY THE ARBITRATOR | 7 December 2015 | WT/DS384/ARB/Add.1; WT/DS386/ARB/Add.1; WT/DS384/ARB; WT/DS386/ARB. | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 62 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF
ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES
DECISIONS BY THE ARBITRATOR
Addendum
This addendum contains Annexes A to C to the Decisions by the Arbitrator to be found in
documents , and
•
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX A
WORKING PROCEDURES OF... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.506069 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ28_Request_For_Consultations.pdf | DS384_SEQ28_Request_For_Consultations.pdf | 28 | Request_For_Consultations | Request for Consultations by Canada | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 4 December 2008 | WT/DS384/1; G/L/874; G/TBT/D/33; G/SPS/GEN/890; G/RO/D/6 | General Council; Rules of Origin (RO); Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS); Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Request for Consultations by Canada
The following communication, dated 1 December 2008, from the delegation of Canada to the
delegation of the United States and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in
accordance with Art... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.506823 |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ29_Report_Of_Panel_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ29_Report_Of_Panel_00.pdf | 29 | Report_Of_Panel | Panel Report | PANEL_REPORT | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE BY CANADA TO ARTICLE 22.2 OF THE DSU | 5 June 2015 | WT/DS384/35 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE BY CANADA TO ARTICLE 22.2 OF THE DSU
The following communication, dated 4 June 2015, from the delegation of Canada to the
Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 22.2 of the DSU.
Canada submits this r... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.508220 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ30_Report_Of_Panel_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ30_Report_Of_Panel_01.pdf | 30 | Report_Of_Panel | Panel Report | PANEL_REPORT | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO REPORTS OF THE PANEL | 20 October 2014 | WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS386/RW; WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS386/RW.; WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS386/RW | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 206 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF
ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
REPORTS OF THE PANEL
Note by the Secretariat:
These Panel Reports are in the form of a single document constituting two separate Panel Reports:
and The cover page, preliminary pages, secti... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.674511 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ31_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ31_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_00.pdf | 31 | Report_Of_Appellate_Body | Appellate Body Reports and Panel Reports Action by the Dispute Settlement Body | AB_REPORT | null | 0 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 25 July 2012 | WT/DS384/18; WT/DS386/17; WT/DS384/AB/R; WT/DS386/AB/R; WT/DS384/R; WT/DS386/R | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Appellate Body Reports and Panel Reports
Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
At its meeting on 23 July 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Appellate Body
reports on
(, ) and the Pane l reports (, ), as
modified by the Appellate Body... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.675140 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ32_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ32_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_01.pdf | 32 | Report_Of_Appellate_Body | Report of the Appellate Body | AB_REPORT | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE BY CANADA TO ARTICLE 22.7 OF THE DSU | 8 December 2015 | WT/DS384/38 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE BY CANADA TO ARTICLE 22.7 OF THE DSU
The following communication, dated 7 December 2015, from the delegation of Canada to the
Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 22.7 of the DSU.
Canada submits th... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.675888 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ33_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_02.pdf | DS384_SEQ33_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_02.pdf | 33 | Report_Of_Appellate_Body | Reports of the Appellate Body Note: The Appellate Body is issuing these Reports in th e form of a single document constituting two separate Appellate Body Reports: WT/DS384/AB/RW; and WT/DS386/AB/RW. The cover page, preliminary pages, sections 1 through 5, and the annexes are common to both Reports. The page header thr... | AB_REPORT | null | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO AB-2014-10 | 18 May 2015 | WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW; WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW.; WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 191 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF
ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
AB-2014-10
Reports of the Appellate Body
Note:
The Appellate Body is issuing these Reports in th e form of a single document constituting two
separate Appellate Body Reports: ; and The cover... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.818747 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ34_Recourse_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ34_Recourse_00.pdf | 34 | Recourse | RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA NOTIFICATION OF AN OTHER APPEAL BY CANADA UNDER ARTICLE 16.4 AND ARTICLE 17 OF THE UNDERSTANDING ON RULES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES (DSU), AND UNDER RULE 23(1) OF THE WORKING PROCEDURES FOR APPELLATE REVIEW | RECOURSE | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 16 December 2014 | WT/DS384/30 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA
NOTIFICATION OF AN OTHER APPEAL BY CANADA
UNDER ARTICLE 16.4 AND ARTICLE 17 OF THE UNDERSTANDING ON RULES
AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES (DSU),
AND UNDER RULE 23(1) OF THE WORKING ... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.820122 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ35_Recourse_Corr.pdf | DS384_SEQ35_Recourse_Corr.pdf | 35 | Recourse | Corrigendum The subtitle in WT/DS384/36 should read as follows: RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES ÉTATS-UNIS – CERTAINES PRESCRIPTIONS EN MATIÈRE D'ÉTIQUETAGE INDIQUANT LE PAYS D'ORIGINE (EPO) Corrigendum Le sous-titre du document WT/DS384/36 doit se lire comme suit: RECOURS DES ÉTATS-UNIS À L'AR... | RECOURSE | Corr | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 23 June 2015 | WT/DS384/36/Corr.1; WT/DS384/36; WT/DS384/36; WT/DS384/36 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
Corrigendum
The subtitle in should read as follows:
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES
ÉTATS-UNIS – CERTAINES PRESCRIPTIONS EN MATIÈRE D'ÉTIQUETAGE
INDIQUANT LE PAYS D'ORIGINE (EPO)
Corrigendum
RECOURS DES ÉTATS-UNIS À L'AR... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.820386 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ36_Recourse_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ36_Recourse_01.pdf | 36 | Recourse | RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES DECISIONS BY THE ARBITRATOR | RECOURSE | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 7 December 2015 | WT/DS384/ARB; WT/DS386/ARB | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 82 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES
DECISIONS BY THE ARBITRATOR
●
BCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX A
WORKING PROCEDURES OF THE ARBITRATOR
Contents Page
Annex A-1 Working Procedures of the Arbitrator (WT... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.882714 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ37_Request_For_Arbitration_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ37_Request_For_Arbitration_00.pdf | 37 | Request_For_Arbitration | Request by Canada for Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU | ARBITRATION | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 17 September 2012 | WT/DS384/20; WT/DS384/AB/R; WT/DS384/R | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Request by Canada for Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU
The following communication, dated 13 Septem ber 2012, from the delega tion of Canada to
the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated at the request of that dele... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.883353 | |
384 | 384 | DS384_SEQ38_Request_For_Arbitration_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ38_Request_For_Arbitration_01.pdf | 38 | Request_For_Arbitration | REQUEST BY THE UNITED STATES FOR ARBITRATION | ARBITRATION | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS REQUEST BY THE UNITED STATES FOR ARBITRATION UNDER ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU | 17 June 2015 | WT/DS384/36 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
REQUEST BY THE UNITED STATES FOR ARBITRATION UNDER ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU
The following communication, dated 16 June 2015, from the delegation of the United States to the
Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Articl... | 2026-03-15T15:53:32.884076 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ01_Note_By_Secretariat_00.pdf | DS386_SEQ01_Note_By_Secretariat_00.pdf | 1 | Note_By_Secretariat | Constitution of the Panel Established at the Requests of Canada and Mexico Note by the Secretariat | NUMBERED | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 11 May 2010 | WT/DS384/9; WT/DS386/8; WT/DS384/8; WT/DS386/7; WT/DS384/8 | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Constitution of the Panel Established at the Requests of Canada and Mexico
Note by the Secretariat
1. At its meeting on 19 November 2009, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) established a
single panel pursuant to the requests of Canada in document... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.928528 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ02_Communication_00.pdf | DS386_SEQ02_Communication_00.pdf | 2 | Communication | Communication from the Chairman of the Panel | NUMBERED | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 6 January 2011 | WT/DS384/10; WT/DS386/9 | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Communication from the Chairman of the Panel
The following communication, dated 21 Dece mber 2010, addressed to the Chairman of the
Dispute Settlement Body (DSB), is circulated in accordance with Article 12.9 of the Dispute
Settlement Understand... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.929043 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ03_Notification_Of_Appeal.pdf | DS386_SEQ03_Notification_Of_Appeal.pdf | 3 | Notification_Of_Appeal | Notification of an Appeal by the United States under Article 16.4 and Article 17 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), and under Rule 20(1) of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 28 March 2012 | WT/DS384/12; WT/DS386/11 | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Notification of an Appeal by the United States
under Article 16.4 and Article 17 of the Understanding on Rules
and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU),
and under Rule 20(1) of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review
The fol... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.930573 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ04_Communication_01.pdf | DS386_SEQ04_Communication_01.pdf | 4 | Communication | Communication from the Appellate Body | NUMBERED | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 23 May 2012 | WT/DS384/14; WT/DS386/13 | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Communication from the Appellate Body
The following communication, dated 21 May 2012, from the Chair of the Appellate Body
addressed to the Chair of the Dispute Settlement Bo dy, is circulated in accordance with Article 17.5
of the Understanding... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.931178 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ05_Request_For_Decision.pdf | DS386_SEQ05_Request_For_Decision.pdf | 5 | Request_For_Decision | Joint Request by Canada, Mexico and the United States for a Decision by the DSB | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 29 June 2012 | WT/DS384/15; WT/DS386/14 | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 4 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Joint Request by Canada, Mexico and the United States
for a Decision by the DSB
The following communication, dated 28 June 2012, from the delegations of Canada, Mexico
and the United States to the Chairperson of the Dis pute Settlement Body (DSB... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.932988 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ06_Communication_02.pdf | DS386_SEQ06_Communication_02.pdf | 6 | Communication | Communication from the Appellate Body | NUMBERED | null | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 3 July 2012 | WT/DS384/16; WT/DS386/15; WT/DS384/AB/R; WT/DS386/AB/R. | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Communication from the Appellate Body
The following communication, dated 29 June 2012, from the Chair of the Appellate Body
addressed to the Chair of the Dispute Settlement Bo dy, is circulated in accordance with Article 17.5
of the Understandin... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.933313 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ07_Communication_03.pdf | DS386_SEQ07_Communication_03.pdf | 7 | Communication | Communication from the United States | NUMBERED | null | 3 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 23 August 2012 | WT/DS384/19; WT/DS386/18 | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Communication from the United States
The following communication, dated 21 August 2012, from the delegation of the
United States to the Chairman of the Dispute Settleme nt Body (DSB), is circulated at the request of
the United States.
At its me... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.933766 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ08_Note_By_Secretariat_01.pdf | DS386_SEQ08_Note_By_Secretariat_01.pdf | 8 | Note_By_Secretariat | Appointment of Arbitrator by the Director-General under Article 21.3(c) of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes Note by the Secretariat On 4 October 2012, pursuant to the request received on 26 September 2012 from Canada and Mexico, the Director-General appointed Mr. Giorgio S... | NUMBERED | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 9 October 2012 | WT/DS384/21; WT/DS386/20 | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
Appointment of Arbitrator by the Director-General under Article 21.3(c) of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes
Note by the Secretariat
On 4 October 2012, pursuant to the request received on 26 Septembe... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.934011 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ09_Communication_04.pdf | DS386_SEQ09_Communication_04.pdf | 9 | Communication | Communication from the United States | NUMBERED | null | 4 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 7 November 2012 | WT/DS384/23; WT/DS386/22 | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 1 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
Communication from the United States
The following communication, dated 2 November 2012 from the delegation of the
United States to the Arbitrator, is circulated to Members.
The United States wishes to confirm that it shall deem the awards in ... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.934235 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ10_Executive_Summary_02.pdf | DS386_SEQ10_Executive_Summary_02.pdf | 10 | Executive_Summary | WT/DS384/R WT/DS386/R Page A-1 ANNEX A EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES OF THE FIRST WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES Contents Page Annex A-1 Executive summary of the fi rst written submission of Canada A-2 Annex A-2 Executive summary of the fi rst written submission of Mexico A-9 Annex A-3 Executive summary of the first wr itten... | NUMBERED | null | 2 | null | WT/DS384/R; WT/DS386/R | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 32 | ANNEX A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES OF THE FIRST WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS
OF THE PARTIES
Contents Page
Annex A-1 Executive summary of the fi rst written submission of Canada A-2
Annex A-2 Executive summary of the fi rst written submission of Mexico A-9
Annex A-3 Executive summary of the first wr itten submission of the United Sta... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.950353 | ||
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ11_Executive_Summary_03.pdf | DS386_SEQ11_Executive_Summary_03.pdf | 11 | Executive_Summary | WT/DS384/R WT/DS386/R Page B-1 ANNEX B EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES OF THE SECOND WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES Contents Page Annex B-1 Executive summary of the second written submission of Canada B-2 Annex B-2 Executive summary of the second written submission of Mexico B-10 | NUMBERED | null | 3 | null | WT/DS384/R; WT/DS386/R | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 34 | ANNEX B
EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES OF THE SECOND WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS
OF THE PARTIES
Contents Page
Annex B-1 Executive summary of the second written submission of Canada B-2
Annex B-2 Executive summary of the second written submission of Mexico B-10
Annex B-3 Executive summary of the second written submission of the United S... | 2026-03-15T15:53:36.969013 | ||
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ12_Executive_Summary_04.pdf | DS386_SEQ12_Executive_Summary_04.pdf | 12 | Executive_Summary | WT/DS384/R WT/DS386/R Page C-1 ANNEX C THIRD PARTY SUBMISSIONS Contents Page Annex C-1 Executive summary of the third party written submission of Australia C-2 Annex C-2 Third party oral statement of Australia at the first substantive meeting C-7 Annex C-3 Third party oral statement of Australia at the second substanti... | NUMBERED | null | 4 | null | WT/DS384/R; WT/DS386/R | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 76 | ANNEX C
THIRD PARTY SUBMISSIONS
Contents Page
Annex C-1 Executive summary of the third party written submission of Australia C-2
Annex C-2 Third party oral statement of Australia at the first substantive meeting C-7
Annex C-3 Third party oral statement of Australia at the second substantive meeting C-11
Annex C-4 Thi... | 2026-03-15T15:53:37.010482 | ||
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ13_Executive_Summary_05.pdf | DS386_SEQ13_Executive_Summary_05.pdf | 13 | Executive_Summary | WT/DS384/R WT/DS386/R Page D-1 ANNEX D ORAL STATEMENTS OF THE PARTIES AT THE FIRST AND SECOND SUBSTANTIVE MEETINGS Contents Page Annex D-1 Executive summary of the opening oral statement of Canada at the first substantive meeting D-2 | NUMBERED | null | 5 | null | WT/DS384/R; WT/DS386/R | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 46 | ANNEX D
ORAL STATEMENTS OF THE PARTIES
AT THE FIRST AND SECOND SUBSTANTIVE MEETINGS
Contents Page
Annex D-1 Executive summary of the opening oral statement of Canada at the first
substantive meeting
D-2
Annex D-2 Executive summary of the opening oral statement of Mexico at the first
substantive meeting
D-6
Annex D-3 ... | 2026-03-15T15:53:37.031776 | ||
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ14_Working_Procedures_06.pdf | DS386_SEQ14_Working_Procedures_06.pdf | 14 | Working_Procedures | WT/DS384/R WT/DS386/R Page E-1 ANNEX E WORKING PROCEDURES FOR THE PANEL CONTENTS PAGE E-1 Working procedures for the Panel as revised on 21 September 2010 E-2 E-2 Additional procedures for the protection of business confidential information | NUMBERED | null | 6 | 21 September 2010 | WT/DS384/R; WT/DS386/R | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 8 | ANNEX E
WORKING PROCEDURES FOR THE PANEL
CONTENTS PAGE
E-1 Working procedures for the Panel as revised on 21 September 2010
E-2
E-2 Additional procedures for the protection of business confidential information
("BCI procedures")
E-6
UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
(DS384 and ... | 2026-03-15T15:53:37.034814 | ||
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ15_Report_Of_Panel_01.pdf | DS386_SEQ15_Report_Of_Panel_01.pdf | 15 | Report_Of_Panel | Panel Report | PANEL_REPORT | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 18 November 2011 | WT/DS384/R; WT/DS386/R | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 234 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
Reports of the Panel
Note:
In the disputes WT/DS384 and WT/DS386, as explaine d in paragraph 2.11 of the Panel's Findings,
the Panel decided to issue its Reports in the form of a single document constituting two Panel Reports,
each of the Report... | 2026-03-15T15:53:37.179785 | |
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ16_Report_Of_Panel_07.pdf | DS386_SEQ16_Report_Of_Panel_07.pdf | 16 | Report_Of_Panel | WT/DS384/R WT/DS386/R Page F-1 ANNEX F PROCEDURES FOR OPEN HEARINGS CONTENTS PAGE F-1 Procedures for open hearings, first and second substantive meetings of the Panel F-2 | PANEL_REPORT | null | 7 | null | WT/DS384/R; WT/DS386/R | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 3 | ANNEX F
PROCEDURES FOR OPEN HEARINGS
CONTENTS PAGE
F-1 Procedures for open hearings, first and second substantive meetings of the
Panel
F-2
UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
(DS384 and DS386)
Procedures for open hearings, first and second substantive meetings of the Panel
1
1.... | 2026-03-15T15:53:37.180792 | ||
384 | 386 | DS386_SEQ17_Report_Of_Appellate_Body.pdf | DS386_SEQ17_Report_Of_Appellate_Body.pdf | 17 | Report_Of_Appellate_Body | Appellate Body Report | AB_REPORT | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 29 June 2012 | WT/DS384/AB/R; WT/DS386/AB/R; WT/DS386/AB; WT/DS384/AB/R; WT/DS386/AB/R | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 254 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
AB-2012-3
Reports of the Appellate Body
Note:
The Appellate Body is issuing these Reports in the form of a single document constituting
two separate Appellate Body Reports: WT/DS384/ AB/R; and /R. The cover page,
preliminary pages, sections I t... | 2026-03-15T15:53:37.309430 | |
385 | 385 | DS385_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations.pdf | DS385_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations.pdf | 1 | Request_For_Consultations | Request for Consultations by India | NUMBERED | null | null | EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – EXPIRY REVIEWS OF ANTI-DUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTIES IMPOSED ON IMPORTS OF PET FROM INDIA | 10 December 2008 | WT/DS385/1; G/L/877; G/ADP/D77/1; G/SCM/D80/1 | Anti-Dumping Practices (ADP); General Council; Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM) | ['India'] | ['EU'] | [] | Consultation | Art. 6.1, 6.2, 6.5, 6.6, 6.8, 11.1, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, 18.4, Annex II Anti-dumpingArt. 12.1, 12.5, 12.7, 21.3, 21.4, 32.5 Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)Art. XVI:4 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization | The summary below was up-to-date at
24 February 2010
Consultations
Complaint by India.
On 4 December 2008, India requested consultations with the European Communities.
India considers that (a) Article 11(2) of the EC's Basic Anti-Dumping Regulation read together with Regulation 1182/71 and (b) Article 18(1) o... | 3 | EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – EXPIRY REVIEWS OF ANTI-DUMPING AND
COUNTERVAILING DUTIES IMPOSED ON IMPORTS OF PET FROM INDIA
Request for Consultations by India
The following communication, dated 4 December 2008, from the delegation of India to the
delegation of the European Communities and to th e Chairman of the Dispute Se... | 2026-03-15T15:53:37.327669 |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ01_Understanding.pdf | DS384_SEQ01_Understanding.pdf | 1 | Understanding | ARB-2012-1/26 Arbitration under Article 21.3(c) of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 4 December 2012 | WT/DS384/24; WT/DS386/23 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 70 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
ARB-2012-1/26
Arbitration
under Article 21.3(c) of the
Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes
Award of the Arbitrator
Giorgio Sacerdoti
AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR
Parties:
Canada
Mexico
ARB-2012-1/26
Arbitr... | 2026-03-15T15:53:44.950128 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ02_Note_By_Secretariat.pdf | DS384_SEQ02_Note_By_Secretariat.pdf | 2 | Note_By_Secretariat | Note by the Secretariat | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL | 10 October 2013 | WT/DS384/27; WT/DS386/26; WT/DS384/26; WT/DS386/25. | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
CONSTITUTION OF THE PANEL
Note by the Secretariat
1. At its meeting on 25 September 2013, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) referred these
disputes, if possible, to the original Panel in acco... | 2026-03-15T15:53:44.950619 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ03_Communication_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ03_Communication_00.pdf | 3 | Communication | RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL | NUMBERED | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 27 March 2014 | WT/DS384/28; WT/DS386/27 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
COMMUNICATION FROM THE PANEL
The following communication, dated 26 March 2014, was received from the Chairperson of the
Panel with the request that it be circulated to the Dispute Settlement... | 2026-03-15T15:53:44.951271 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ04_Notification_Of_Appeal.pdf | DS384_SEQ04_Notification_Of_Appeal.pdf | 4 | Notification_Of_Appeal | RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO NOTIFICATION OF AN APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES UNDER ARTICLE 16.4 AND ARTICLE 17 OF THE UNDERSTANDING ON RULES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES (DSU), AND UNDER RULE 20(1) OF THE WORKING PROCEDURES FOR APPELLATE REVIEW | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 2 December 2014 | WT/DS384/29; WT/DS386/28 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING
(COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
NOTIFICATION OF AN APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES
UNDER ARTICLE 16.4 AND ARTICLE 17 OF THE UNDERSTANDING ON RULES
AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES (DSU),
AND UNDER RULE 20(1)... | 2026-03-15T15:53:44.952637 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ05_Communication_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ05_Communication_01.pdf | 5 | Communication | COMMUNICATION FROM | NUMBERED | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY MEXICO COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY | 27 January 2015 | WT/DS384/31; WT/DS386/30 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY MEXICO
COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY
The following notification, dated 26 January 2015, from the Chair of the Appellate Body addressed
to the Chair of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated to Memb... | 2026-03-15T15:53:44.953750 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ06_Communication_02.pdf | DS384_SEQ06_Communication_02.pdf | 6 | Communication | COMMUNICATION FROM | NUMBERED | null | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY | 5 March 2015 | WT/DS384/32; WT/DS386/31 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY
The following notification, dated 2 March 2015, from the Chair of the Appellate Body addressed to
the Chair of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circul ate... | 2026-03-15T15:53:44.954335 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ07_Communication_03.pdf | DS384_SEQ07_Communication_03.pdf | 7 | Communication | COMMUNICATION FROM | NUMBERED | null | 3 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY | 19 May 2015 | WT/DS384/33; WT/DS386/32; WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
COMMUNICATION FROM THE APPELLATE BODY
The following communication, dated 18 May 2015, from the Chair of the Appellate Body addressed
to the Chair of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated... | 2026-03-15T15:53:44.954677 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ08_DSB_Action.pdf | DS384_SEQ08_DSB_Action.pdf | 8 | DSB_Action | Action by the Dispute Settlement Body | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS APPELLATE BODY REPORTS AND PANEL REPORTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU | 5 June 2015 | WT/DS384/34; WT/DS386/33; WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW; WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS384/RW/Add.1; WT/DS386/RW; WT/DS386/RW/Add.1 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
APPELLATE BODY REPORTS AND PANEL REPORTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU
Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
At its meeting on 29 May 2015, the Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Appellate Body reports
on United States – Certain Country of O... | 2026-03-15T15:53:44.955240 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ09_Communication_04.pdf | DS384_SEQ09_Communication_04.pdf | 9 | Communication | COMMUNICATION FROM | NUMBERED | null | 4 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS COMMUNICATION FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION | 11 December 2015 | WT/DS384/39; WT/DS386/40 | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 2 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
COMMUNICATION FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION
The following communication, dated 9 December 2015, from the delegation of the European Union
to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated at the request of that delegation.
The European Un... | 2026-03-15T15:53:44.956379 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ10_Addendum_Add.pdf | DS384_SEQ10_Addendum_Add.pdf | 10 | Addendum | Addendum | NUMBERED | Add | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO REPORTS OF THE PANEL | 20 October 2014 | WT/DS384/RW/Add.1; WT/DS386/RW/Add.1; WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS386/RW. | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 83 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF
ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
REPORTS OF THE PANEL
Addendum
This addendum contains Annexes A to C to the Reports of the Panel to be found in documents
and
•
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX A
WORKING PROCEDURES OF THE PANEL
Cont... | 2026-03-15T15:53:45.010563 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ11_Addendum_Add.pdf | DS384_SEQ11_Addendum_Add.pdf | 11 | Addendum | Addendum | NUMBERED | Add | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES DECISIONS BY THE ARBITRATOR | 7 December 2015 | WT/DS384/ARB/Add.1; WT/DS386/ARB/Add.1; WT/DS384/ARB; WT/DS386/ARB. | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 62 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF
ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES
DECISIONS BY THE ARBITRATOR
Addendum
This addendum contains Annexes A to C to the Decisions by the Arbitrator to be found in
documents , and
•
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX A
WORKING PROCEDURES OF... | 2026-03-15T15:53:45.045227 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ12_Report_Of_Panel.pdf | DS384_SEQ12_Report_Of_Panel.pdf | 12 | Report_Of_Panel | Panel Report | PANEL_REPORT | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO REPORTS OF THE PANEL | 20 October 2014 | WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS386/RW; WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS386/RW.; WT/DS384/RW; WT/DS386/RW | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 206 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF
ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
REPORTS OF THE PANEL
Note by the Secretariat:
These Panel Reports are in the form of a single document constituting two separate Panel Reports:
and The cover page, preliminary pages, secti... | 2026-03-15T15:53:45.210821 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ13_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_00.pdf | DS384_SEQ13_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_00.pdf | 13 | Report_Of_Appellate_Body | Appellate Body Reports and Panel Reports Action by the Dispute Settlement Body | AB_REPORT | null | 0 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 25 July 2012 | WT/DS384/18; WT/DS386/17; WT/DS384/AB/R; WT/DS386/AB/R; WT/DS384/R; WT/DS386/R | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 1 | UNITED STATES - CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
Appellate Body Reports and Panel Reports
Action by the Dispute Settlement Body
At its meeting on 23 July 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Appellate Body
reports on
(, ) and the Pane l reports (, ), as
modified by the Appellate Body... | 2026-03-15T15:53:45.211447 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ14_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_01.pdf | DS384_SEQ14_Report_Of_Appellate_Body_01.pdf | 14 | Report_Of_Appellate_Body | Reports of the Appellate Body Note: The Appellate Body is issuing these Reports in th e form of a single document constituting two separate Appellate Body Reports: WT/DS384/AB/RW; and WT/DS386/AB/RW. The cover page, preliminary pages, sections 1 through 5, and the annexes are common to both Reports. The page header thr... | AB_REPORT | null | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO AB-2014-10 | 18 May 2015 | WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW; WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW.; WT/DS384/AB/RW; WT/DS386/AB/RW | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 191 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF
ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU BY CANADA AND MEXICO
AB-2014-10
Reports of the Appellate Body
Note:
The Appellate Body is issuing these Reports in th e form of a single document constituting two
separate Appellate Body Reports: ; and The cover... | 2026-03-15T15:53:45.357386 | |
386 | 384 | DS384_SEQ15_Recourse.pdf | DS384_SEQ15_Recourse.pdf | 15 | Recourse | RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES DECISIONS BY THE ARBITRATOR | RECOURSE | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL) REQUIREMENTS | 7 December 2015 | WT/DS384/ARB; WT/DS386/ARB | ['Canada'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'Mexico', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. IX:2, IX, X:3(a) GATT 1994Art. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(j) Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
22 February 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Canada. (See also DS386)
On 1 December 2008, Canada requested consultations with the United States concerning certain mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) p... | 82 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING (COOL)
REQUIREMENTS
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY THE UNITED STATES
DECISIONS BY THE ARBITRATOR
●
BCI deleted as indicated [[BCI]]
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX A
WORKING PROCEDURES OF THE ARBITRATOR
Contents Page
Annex A-1 Working Procedures of the Arbitrator (WT... | 2026-03-15T15:53:45.418563 | |
386 | 386 | DS386_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations.pdf | DS386_SEQ01_Request_For_Consultations.pdf | 1 | Request_For_Consultations | Request for Consultations by Mexico | NUMBERED | null | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING REQUIREMENTS | 22 December 2008 | WT/DS386/1; G/L/878; G/TBT/D/34; G/SPS/GEN/893; G/RO/D/7 | General Council; Rules of Origin (RO); Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS); Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING REQUIREMENTS
Request for Consultations by Mexico
The following communication, dated 17 Dece mber 2008, from the delegation of Mexico to
the delegation of the United States and to the Chairm an of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated
in accordance with Article... | 2026-03-15T15:53:49.829660 |
386 | 386 | DS386_SEQ02_Request_For_Consultations_Add.pdf | DS386_SEQ02_Request_For_Consultations_Add.pdf | 2 | Request_For_Consultations | Request for Consultations by Mexico Addendum | NUMBERED | Add | null | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING REQUIREMENTS | 11 May 2009 | WT/DS386/1/Add.1; G/L/878/Add.1; G/TBT/D/34/Add.1; G/SPS/GEN/893/Add.1; G/RO/D/7/Add.1 | General Council; Rules of Origin (RO); Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS); Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 2 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING REQUIREMENTS
Request for Consultations by Mexico
Addendum
The following communication, dated 7 May 20 09, from the delegation of Mexico to the
delegation of the United States and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in
accordance with Arti... | 2026-03-15T15:53:49.830515 |
386 | 386 | DS386_SEQ03_Request_To_Join_Consultations_00.pdf | DS386_SEQ03_Request_To_Join_Consultations_00.pdf | 3 | Request_To_Join_Consultations | Request to Join Consultations Communication from Canada | NUMBERED | null | 0 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING REQUIREMENTS | 7 January 2009 | WT/DS386/2 | ['Mexico'] | ['U.S.'] | ['Argentina', 'Australia', 'Brazil', 'Canada', 'China', 'Colombia', 'EU', 'Guatemala', 'India', 'Japan', 'South Korea', 'New Zealand', 'Peru', 'Taiwan'] | Implementation & Compliance | Art. III, X:3(a), IX GATT 1994Art. 2, 12 Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)Art. 2, 5, 7 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)Art. 2 Rules of Origin | The summary below was up-to-date at
20 January 2016
See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute
Consultations
Complaint by Mexico. (See also DS384)
On 17 December 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States concerning the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) provi... | 1 | UNITED STATES – CERTAIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
LABELLING REQUIREMENTS
Request to Join Consultations
Communication from Canada
The following communication, dated 30 Dece mber 2008, from the delegation of Canada to
the delegation of the United States, the delegation of Mexico and to the Chairman of the Dispute
Settlement ... | 2026-03-15T15:53:49.830889 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.