====================================================================== Model: molmo-7B-O-0924 ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 326 483 67.5% far counter 16 61 26.2% far ambiguous 24 50 48.0% close consistent 294 493 59.6% close counter 29 68 42.6% close ambiguous 22 51 43.1% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 620 976 63.5% TOTAL counter 45 129 34.9% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 28.6%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 84 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: molmo-7B-O-0924-data_scale_exp_80k ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 269 483 55.7% far counter 19 61 31.1% far ambiguous 21 50 42.0% close consistent 322 493 65.3% close counter 19 68 27.9% close ambiguous 16 51 31.4% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 591 976 60.6% TOTAL counter 38 129 29.5% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 31.1%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 91 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: molmo-7B-O-0924-data_scale_exp_400k ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 315 483 65.2% far counter 15 61 24.6% far ambiguous 19 50 38.0% close consistent 297 493 60.2% close counter 20 68 29.4% close ambiguous 16 51 31.4% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 612 976 62.7% TOTAL counter 35 129 27.1% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 35.6%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 94 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: molmo-7B-O-0924-data_scale_exp_800k ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 319 483 66.0% far counter 22 61 36.1% far ambiguous 19 50 38.0% close consistent 317 493 64.3% close counter 22 68 32.4% close ambiguous 23 51 45.1% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 636 976 65.2% TOTAL counter 44 129 34.1% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 31.1%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 85 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: molmo-7B-O-0924-data_scale_exp_2m ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 312 483 64.6% far counter 18 61 29.5% far ambiguous 20 50 40.0% close consistent 325 493 65.9% close counter 33 68 48.5% close ambiguous 24 51 47.1% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 637 976 65.3% TOTAL counter 51 129 39.5% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 25.7%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 78 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: NVILA-Lite-2B ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 242 483 50.1% far counter 15 61 24.6% far ambiguous 14 50 28.0% close consistent 236 493 47.9% close counter 20 68 29.4% close ambiguous 20 51 39.2% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 478 976 49.0% TOTAL counter 35 129 27.1% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 21.8%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 94 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: NVILA-Lite-2B-data-scale-exp-80k ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 317 483 65.6% far counter 2 61 3.3% far ambiguous 11 50 22.0% close consistent 246 493 49.9% close counter 18 68 26.5% close ambiguous 15 51 29.4% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 563 976 57.7% TOTAL counter 20 129 15.5% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 42.2%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 109 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: NVILA-Lite-2B-data-scale-exp-400k ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 319 483 66.0% far counter 12 61 19.7% far ambiguous 18 50 36.0% close consistent 277 493 56.2% close counter 32 68 47.1% close ambiguous 20 51 39.2% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 596 976 61.1% TOTAL counter 44 129 34.1% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 27.0%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 85 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: NVILA-Lite-2B-data-scale-exp-800k ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 335 483 69.4% far counter 17 61 27.9% far ambiguous 20 50 40.0% close consistent 282 493 57.2% close counter 33 68 48.5% close ambiguous 15 51 29.4% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 617 976 63.2% TOTAL counter 50 129 38.8% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 24.5%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 79 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: NVILA-Lite-2B-data-scale-exp-2m ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 324 483 67.1% far counter 19 61 31.1% far ambiguous 21 50 42.0% close consistent 268 493 54.4% close counter 34 68 50.0% close ambiguous 20 51 39.2% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 592 976 60.7% TOTAL counter 53 129 41.1% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 19.6%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 76 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: NVILA-Lite-2B-ST-80k-5pct ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 307 483 63.6% far counter 5 61 8.2% far ambiguous 14 50 28.0% close consistent 226 493 45.8% close counter 16 68 23.5% close ambiguous 14 51 27.5% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 533 976 54.6% TOTAL counter 21 129 16.3% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 38.3%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 108 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: NVILA-Lite-2B-ST-400k-5pct ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 308 483 63.8% far counter 3 61 4.9% far ambiguous 14 50 28.0% close consistent 202 493 41.0% close counter 34 68 50.0% close ambiguous 22 51 43.1% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 510 976 52.3% TOTAL counter 37 129 28.7% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 23.6%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 92 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: NVILA-Lite-2B-ST-800k-5pct ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 318 483 65.8% far counter 17 61 27.9% far ambiguous 22 50 44.0% close consistent 225 493 45.6% close counter 34 68 50.0% close ambiguous 17 51 33.3% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 543 976 55.6% TOTAL counter 51 129 39.5% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 16.1%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 78 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: RoboRefer-2B-SFT ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 422 483 87.4% far counter 28 61 45.9% far ambiguous 34 50 68.0% close consistent 427 493 86.6% close counter 49 68 72.1% close ambiguous 37 51 72.5% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 849 976 87.0% TOTAL counter 77 129 59.7% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 27.3%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 52 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 274 483 56.7% far counter 15 61 24.6% far ambiguous 16 50 32.0% close consistent 260 493 52.7% close counter 27 68 39.7% close ambiguous 17 51 33.3% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 534 976 54.7% TOTAL counter 42 129 32.6% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 22.2%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 87 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct-data_scale_exp_80k ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 267 483 55.3% far counter 15 61 24.6% far ambiguous 13 50 26.0% close consistent 227 493 46.0% close counter 24 68 35.3% close ambiguous 18 51 35.3% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 494 976 50.6% TOTAL counter 39 129 30.2% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 20.4%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 90 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct-data_scale_exp_400k ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 275 483 56.9% far counter 13 61 21.3% far ambiguous 17 50 34.0% close consistent 238 493 48.3% close counter 22 68 32.4% close ambiguous 17 51 33.3% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 513 976 52.6% TOTAL counter 35 129 27.1% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 25.4%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 94 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct-data_scale_exp_800k ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 297 483 61.5% far counter 12 61 19.7% far ambiguous 16 50 32.0% close consistent 248 493 50.3% close counter 22 68 32.4% close ambiguous 15 51 29.4% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 545 976 55.8% TOTAL counter 34 129 26.4% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 29.5%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 95 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct-data_scale_exp_2m ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 313 483 64.8% far counter 6 61 9.8% far ambiguous 14 50 28.0% close consistent 281 493 57.0% close counter 25 68 36.8% close ambiguous 19 51 37.3% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 594 976 60.9% TOTAL counter 31 129 24.0% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 36.8%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 98 / 129 ====================================================================== Model: Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct ====================================================================== Category Type Correct Total Accuracy ------------------------------------------------------ far consistent 325 483 67.3% far counter 22 61 36.1% far ambiguous 22 50 44.0% close consistent 363 493 73.6% close counter 29 68 42.6% close ambiguous 27 51 52.9% ------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL consistent 688 976 70.5% TOTAL counter 51 129 39.5% Accuracy Gap (Consistent - Counter): 31.0%p -> Larger gap indicates stronger reliance on the 2D heuristic 🔍 Counter examples wrong: 78 / 129 ============================================================================== MODEL COMPARISON ============================================================================== Model Consistent Counter Gap ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ molmo-7B-O-0924 63.5% 34.9% +28.6%p molmo-7B-O-0924-data_scale_exp_80k 60.6% 29.5% +31.1%p molmo-7B-O-0924-data_scale_exp_400k 62.7% 27.1% +35.6%p molmo-7B-O-0924-data_scale_exp_800k 65.2% 34.1% +31.1%p molmo-7B-O-0924-data_scale_exp_2m 65.3% 39.5% +25.7%p NVILA-Lite-2B 49.0% 27.1% +21.8%p NVILA-Lite-2B-data-scale-exp-80k 57.7% 15.5% +42.2%p NVILA-Lite-2B-data-scale-exp-400k 61.1% 34.1% +27.0%p NVILA-Lite-2B-data-scale-exp-800k 63.2% 38.8% +24.5%p NVILA-Lite-2B-data-scale-exp-2m 60.7% 41.1% +19.6%p NVILA-Lite-2B-ST-80k-5pct 54.6% 16.3% +38.3%p NVILA-Lite-2B-ST-400k-5pct 52.3% 28.7% +23.6%p NVILA-Lite-2B-ST-800k-5pct 55.6% 39.5% +16.1%p RoboRefer-2B-SFT 87.0% 59.7% +27.3%p Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct 54.7% 32.6% +22.2%p Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct-data_scale_exp_80k 50.6% 30.2% +20.4%p Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct-data_scale_exp_400k 52.6% 27.1% +25.4%p Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct-data_scale_exp_800k 55.8% 26.4% +29.5%p Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct-data_scale_exp_2m 60.9% 24.0% +36.8%p Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 70.5% 39.5% +31.0%p