id
stringlengths
17
17
body
stringlengths
0
19.5k
posted_at
stringlengths
24
24
karma
int64
-6
185
parent_comment_id
stringlengths
17
17
post_id
stringlengths
17
17
post_title
stringlengths
2
127
post_slug
stringlengths
2
61
post_url
stringlengths
20
146
post_author
stringclasses
214 values
post_posted_at
stringlengths
24
24
wYN7vLkAGeWQPGjGH
> This seems like a pretty extreme level of competence! Combined with the sheer speed and ubiquity of modern LLMs, this alone could be enough to take over the world.[^48igwro05xw] (This begins to touch on questions of control, which is a can of worms I am not going to open right now. Hopefully we can at least agree tha...
2025-10-07T02:03:41.307Z
14
null
8buEtNxCScYpjzgW8
We won’t get AIs smart enough to solve alignment but too dumb to rebel
we-won-t-get-ais-smart-enough-to-solve-alignment-but-too
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8buEtNxCScYpjzgW8/we-won-t-get-ais-smart-enough-to-solve-alignment-but-too
Joe Rogero
2025-10-06T21:49:05.595Z
KcDSZeMq6dtE8Qiqw
Probably? But less likely. Shrug.
2025-10-07T17:34:58.682Z
2
nESTtR7ew8pQfDZyK
QdEHS9TmBBKirz7Ky
LLMs are badly misaligned
llms-are-badly-misaligned
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/QdEHS9TmBBKirz7Ky/llms-are-badly-misaligned
Joe Rogero
2025-10-05T14:00:41.587Z
5zwzmwGGCtiCfEmJJ
> It may take a whole entire post to explain, but I'm curious why you believe Claude is likely to have any care for human wellbeing that would survive reflection. Well, it might really depend on the reflection procedure. I was imagining something like: "you tell Claude it has been given some large quantity of resource...
2025-10-07T17:38:06.425Z
9
Bq9WQMwF3rMzKaisK
QdEHS9TmBBKirz7Ky
LLMs are badly misaligned
llms-are-badly-misaligned
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/QdEHS9TmBBKirz7Ky/llms-are-badly-misaligned
Joe Rogero
2025-10-05T14:00:41.587Z
2nhRvBuzDZwuCGsft
> The short, somewhat trite answer is that it's baked into the premise. If we had a way of getting a powerful optimizer that didn't have misaligned goals, we wouldn't need said optimizer to solve alignment! Sometimes, people argue for doom by noting that it would be hard for humans to directly align wildly superhuman...
2025-10-07T17:56:24.498Z
5
JGJ2syTaTwwmBR29v
8buEtNxCScYpjzgW8
We won’t get AIs smart enough to solve alignment but too dumb to rebel
we-won-t-get-ais-smart-enough-to-solve-alignment-but-too
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8buEtNxCScYpjzgW8/we-won-t-get-ais-smart-enough-to-solve-alignment-but-too
Joe Rogero
2025-10-06T21:49:05.595Z
ZbSaE8m86R6AJskKo
> To clarify, by "align systems..." did you mean the same thing I do, full-blown value alignment / human CEV? No, I mean "make AI robustly pursue the intended aims in practice when deferring to them on doing safety research and managing the situation" which IMO requires something much weaker, though for sufficiently p...
2025-10-08T00:27:08.535Z
9
oKCwRG9x2QGYXCqPk
8buEtNxCScYpjzgW8
We won’t get AIs smart enough to solve alignment but too dumb to rebel
we-won-t-get-ais-smart-enough-to-solve-alignment-but-too
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8buEtNxCScYpjzgW8/we-won-t-get-ais-smart-enough-to-solve-alignment-but-too
Joe Rogero
2025-10-06T21:49:05.595Z
WFTKNJyXr6Gz6k2bT
> Separately, I don't think the anticipation of possible second-order benefits, like using AIs for human augmentation so the humans can solve alignment, is worth letting labs continue either I don't generally think "should labs continue" is very cruxy from my perspective and I don't think of myself as trying to argue ...
2025-10-08T00:28:43.701Z
6
oKCwRG9x2QGYXCqPk
8buEtNxCScYpjzgW8
We won’t get AIs smart enough to solve alignment but too dumb to rebel
we-won-t-get-ais-smart-enough-to-solve-alignment-but-too
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8buEtNxCScYpjzgW8/we-won-t-get-ais-smart-enough-to-solve-alignment-but-too
Joe Rogero
2025-10-06T21:49:05.595Z
86gccY4RLabij9Q8q
> The main class of projects that need granular model weight access to frontier models is model internals/interpretability. You could potentially do a version of this sort of API which has some hooks for interacting with activations to capture a subset of these use cases (e.g. training probes). It would probably add a...
2025-10-09T17:37:20.558Z
7
null
r68nCQK3veQtCdqGt
The Thinking Machines Tinker API is good news for AI control and security
the-thinking-machines-tinker-api-is-good-news-for-ai-control
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/r68nCQK3veQtCdqGt/the-thinking-machines-tinker-api-is-good-news-for-ai-control
Buck
2025-10-09T15:22:15.313Z
6xN4kuWGssvLGbueN
> I’m a bit confused about this distinction, given that in the Bowen paper precisely the thing it breaks is CoT monitorability. Critically, in this work, the reward hack is sufficiently easy that the model doesn't need to use the CoT. It's not that the model is doing substantial encoded reasoning (as fair as we can te...
2025-10-14T17:03:20.792Z
4
rHFRcWNKvjjJz8yD6
Lz8cvGskgXmLRgmN4
Current Language Models Struggle to Reason in Ciphered Language
current-language-models-struggle-to-reason-in-ciphered
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Lz8cvGskgXmLRgmN4/current-language-models-struggle-to-reason-in-ciphered
Fabien Roger
2025-10-14T09:08:47.676Z
TfPJhJf4hYkF5rXY8
The exact text is: > Dario: 6 months ago I I made this prediction that, you know, in in 6 months 90% of code would be written by by by AI models. Some people think that prediction is wrong, but within Anthropic and within a number of companies that we work with, that is absolutely true. > > Marc: Um now 90 you know s...
2025-10-22T18:08:21.914Z
3
ynqCLr8JPCmePe8io
XFGTJz9vGwjJADeFB
AI #107: The Misplaced Hype Machine
ai-107-the-misplaced-hype-machine
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XFGTJz9vGwjJADeFB/ai-107-the-misplaced-hype-machine
Zvi
2025-03-13T14:40:05.318Z
ZwfrGu5NL8JeJoEEb
Doesn't seem like a genre subversion to me, it's just a bit clever/meta while still centrally being an allegorical AI alignment dialogue. IDK what the target audience is though (but maybe Eliezer just felt inspired to write this).
2025-10-27T03:14:24.331Z
17
rmkjMW3DbALeK68sd
dHLdf8SB8oW5L27gg
On Fleshling Safety: A Debate by Klurl and Trapaucius.
on-fleshling-safety-a-debate-by-klurl-and-trapaucius
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dHLdf8SB8oW5L27gg/on-fleshling-safety-a-debate-by-klurl-and-trapaucius
Eliezer Yudkowsky
2025-10-26T23:44:04.676Z
bAq38ApwuwmRmnKcn
Not a crux for me ~at all. Some upstream views that make me think "AI takeover but humans stay alive" is more likely and also make me think avoiding AI takeover is relatively easier might be a crux.
2025-11-20T18:13:01.464Z
3
5dbGqME8fBxAyjR9Y
FA6M8MeQuQJxZyzeq
New Report: An International Agreement to Prevent the Premature Creation of Artificial Superintelligence
new-report-an-international-agreement-to-prevent-the
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FA6M8MeQuQJxZyzeq/new-report-an-international-agreement-to-prevent-the
peterbarnett
2025-11-18T19:09:31.710Z
WiiBxqjfFzaASMgJe
> I don’t believe that datacenter security is actually a problem (see [another argument](/posts/apHWSGDiydv3ivmg6#Cybersecurity)). Sorry, is your claim here that securing datacenters against highly resourced attacks from state actors (e.g. China) is going to be easy? This seems like a crazy claim to me. (This link yo...
2025-11-26T16:40:30.892Z
20
null
FJJ9ff73adnantXiA
Alignment will happen by default. What’s next?
alignment-will-happen-by-default-what-s-next
https://open.substack.com/pub/agarriga/p/alignment-will-happen-by-default
Adrià Garriga-alonso
2025-11-25T07:14:29.740Z
k6gggPyioNpg3zfqP
Filler tokens don't allow for serially deeper cognition than what architectural limits allow (n-layers of processing), but they could totally allow for solving a higher fraction of "heavily serial" reasoning tasks[^seem] insofar as the LLM could still benefit from more parallel processing. For instance, the AI might by...
2025-12-15T19:00:49.824Z
8
null
KFkKPbuYCWc9ygpRp
Filler tokens don’t allow sequential reasoning
filler-tokens-don-t-allow-sequential-reasoning
https://www.brendanlong.com/filler-tokens-dont-allow-sequential-reasoning.html
Brendan Long
2025-12-13T20:22:16.316Z
wXkXjjonMNxKbHJs8
The fit is notably better for "cumulative investment over time". Years still produces a slightly better fit. ![](https://i.imgur.com/n4Vr2up.png) I've cut off the fit as of 2010, about when the original version of moore's law stops. If you try to project out after 2010, then I think cumulative investment would do bet...
2026-01-07T18:05:54.039Z
9
5bFAjjZuBnPHpEhDQ
YABG5JmztGGPwNFq2
AI Futures Timelines and Takeoff Model: Dec 2025 Update
ai-futures-timelines-and-takeoff-model-dec-2025-update
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YABG5JmztGGPwNFq2/ai-futures-timelines-and-takeoff-model-dec-2025-update
elifland
2025-12-31T22:34:18.547Z
33kRqKJcdwepcy2qT
I wrote up my disagreements [in a quick take](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FG54euEAesRkSZuJN/ryan_greenblatt-s-shortform?commentId=onEnC28EB5H4N6TJS).
2026-01-28T16:51:27.192Z
22
null
kzPQohJakutbtFPcf
Dario Amodei – The Adolescence of Technology
dario-amodei-the-adolescence-of-technology
https://www.darioamodei.com/essay/the-adolescence-of-technology
habryka
2026-01-26T19:10:36.047Z
8GxAdmwEs8ezGwbbX
I wonder what the natural way to apply Wright's law to AI is. Cumulative GPU hours? Total quality adjusted inference usage?
2026-01-29T16:06:07.429Z
4
BduqNzNdcCSjXJyZH
YABG5JmztGGPwNFq2
AI Futures Timelines and Takeoff Model: Dec 2025 Update
ai-futures-timelines-and-takeoff-model-dec-2025-update
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YABG5JmztGGPwNFq2/ai-futures-timelines-and-takeoff-model-dec-2025-update
elifland
2025-12-31T22:34:18.547Z
HBhcgcgANwhYj6LMq
For the record, I think [your perspective on RSPs aged better than mine](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jyM7MSTvy8Qs6aZcz/what-s-up-with-rsps). I plan on writing more about how I was wrong and why. (I don't agree with significant aspects/implications of the comment I'm responding to, though I also think it contains i...
2026-02-25T01:40:59.668Z
103
DYvgbmrJiDNd7iLMb
HzKuzrKfaDJvQqmjh
Responsible Scaling Policy v3
responsible-scaling-policy-v3
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HzKuzrKfaDJvQqmjh/responsible-scaling-policy-v3
HoldenKarnofsky
2026-02-24T20:20:47.115Z
hniowuWLjfmXCqJLt
> Some people here @ryan_greenblatt (?) have claimed access to uncensored anthropic models at anthropic, maybe they can chime in about what exactly that means. If safeguards are baked into the model early enough in the training process that removing them requires substantial reengineering and maybe additional training...
2026-02-28T19:57:01.712Z
7
Keb5FgEgHFTikkQZs
d5Lqf8nSxm6RpmmnA
Anthropic: "Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War"
anthropic-statement-from-dario-amodei-on-our-discussions
https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war
Matrice Jacobine
2026-02-26T23:45:40.877Z
KieNmHnDLvgrxA4tq
> What does "AI alignment" even mean at this point? Responding at the object level: - [Clarifying "AI Alignment"](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ZeE7EKHTFMBs8eMxn/clarifying-ai-alignment): "The “alignment problem” is the problem of building powerful AI systems that are aligned with their operators. This is significa...
2026-03-04T19:48:04.687Z
4
fF3mr2k2CtSY2BcYj
zombjEubpz6pcPPHL
Mass surveillance, red lines, and a crazy weekend
mass-surveillance-red-lines-and-a-crazy-weekend
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/zombjEubpz6pcPPHL/mass-surveillance-red-lines-and-a-crazy-weekend
Boaz Barak
2026-03-04T04:24:15.103Z
r5jSHbEHwfgGiDTBK
Strong +1 to this, but I'd note that we should distinguish between the entire classes of black-box and white-box/top-down-interp-for-auditing methods and our current best methods. These results indicate our current best white-box/top-down-interp-for-auditing don't really beat black-box methods (for auditing and probabl...
2026-03-11T17:03:09.845Z
6
zFhcetzEiGpxHEeKm
LqDjxSceFz8tjMe2j
AuditBench: Evaluating Alignment Auditing Techniques on Models with Hidden Behaviors
auditbench-evaluating-alignment-auditing-techniques-on
https://alignment.anthropic.com/2026/auditbench/
abhayesian
2026-03-10T19:31:50.726Z
tSmXj27QgzeDn5NGc
> To a first approximation, we should only hand off trust to AIs if those AIs are trustworthy. I don't think this is a very good approximation, it seems to me like it will very plausibly be a good idea to hand off trust (we might also call this giving up on control) at a point when there is a serious chance these AIs ...
2026-03-17T01:32:15.265Z
4
null
YuMr6kbstuieQHkGj
Types of Handoff to AIs
types-of-handoff-to-ais
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YuMr6kbstuieQHkGj/types-of-handoff-to-ais
Daniel Kokotajlo
2026-03-16T22:24:25.911Z
t9SF4RweEJdEFDbAx
I did a shallow investigation of this and my conclusions were: - [The text on EON's frontpage](https://eon.systems/), [Michael Andregg's tweet thread](https://x.com/michaelandregg/status/2030764512488677736), and [Alex Wissner-Gross' post](https://x.com/alexwg/status/2030217301929132323) seem pretty misleading in prac...
2026-03-18T16:43:14.120Z
45
8JYwJb8wRgiKFXLYE
E9xfgJHvs6M55kABD
Less Dead
less-dead
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/E9xfgJHvs6M55kABD/less-dead
Aurelia
2026-03-11T05:07:18.554Z
GvJ5C3YbngEeSkNMb
I agree with many particular points in this post and the apparent thesis[^uncertain], but also think most people[^qual] should focus on short timelines (contrary to the apparent implication of the post). The reasons why are: - Short timelines have more leverage. This isn't just because of more neglectedness now, but a...
2026-03-22T19:59:28.783Z
35
null
6pDMLYr7my2QMTz3s
Broad Timelines
broad-timelines
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/6pDMLYr7my2QMTz3s/broad-timelines
Toby_Ord
2026-03-19T19:05:31.173Z