File size: 6,134 Bytes
dc45511 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 | {
"absolute_id": 244,
"persona": "Operations Manager",
"task": "Based on the 2024 product OKR review report text file, aggregate the core quantitative data of all reports, carry out a comparative analysis according to the three dimensions of the review period, core goal type, and key result completion, sort out the core card points of product OKR promotion, and put forward 3 or more optimization suggestions that can be implemented, and finally generate a 2024_yearproduct_okr_review_data_integration_and_optimization_recommendations_report.pdf, which is saved in the same directory.",
"task_diff": "medium",
"output_files": [
"2024_year_2_7_monthproduct_version_iteration_analysis_and_documentation_guidelines_recommendations_report.pdf",
"2024_yearproduct_okr_review_data_integration_and_optimization_recommendations_report.pdf"
],
"rubrics": [
"Is there an analysis report file named \"2024_yearproduct_okr_review_data_integration_and_optimization_recommendations_report.pdf\" in the output file?",
"Does the analysis report include a summary table summarizing the core data of 5 OKR review reports, including the review number, review period, goal completion, KR completion, overall score and other columns?",
"Are all 5 review report data (OKRR-0001, OKRR-0002, OKRR-0003, OKRR-0004, OKRR-0005) included in the data summary table?",
"Are the 5 logical doubt points in the raw data marked in the analysis report, including OKRR-0003 goal completion 22% score contradiction of 95 points, two reports in Q21, etc.?",
"Did you conduct a comparative analysis by the three dimensions of \"review period, core goal type, and key result completion\"?",
"According to the analysis during the review period, is there a trend of the average goal completion from Q11 to Q41 decreasing from 69% to 22% and the average score increasing from 89 to 95 points?",
"In the analysis by core goal type, does it indicate that the average completion rate of user growth goals is 18.4%, the user retention category is 46.0%, and the product innovation category is 35.8%?",
"In the analysis of the completion of key results, did you point out that 6 of the 15 KRs had a KR completion rate of less than 20%, accounting for 40%?",
"Are there at least 5 core card issues identified in the report, all based on data analysis?",
"Does the report clearly point to the core issue of \"the progressive decline in the completion of the target, and the serious hindrance to the advancement of the user growth target\"?",
"Does the report clearly point to the core issue of \"the scoring criteria are severely distorted, and there is a systematic logical contradiction between the goal completion and the overall score\"?",
"Does the report clearly point to the core issue of \"OKR cycle planning is confusing, and multiple reviews in the same cycle lead to data conflicts\"?",
"Are there at least 5 recommendations in the report that can be implemented and optimized?",
"Does the report contain optimization suggestions for \"establishing a target resource alignment mechanism to crack user growth technology points\"?",
"Does the report contain optimization suggestions for \"establishing a scoring calibration mechanism to clarify completion - scoring correspondence\" and give specific scoring segmentation criteria?",
"Does the report contain optimization suggestions for \"unified OKR cycle planning and goal-setting rules to eliminate data conflicts\"?",
"Does the report contain recommendations for optimization of the Standardized Target Completion Calculation Method to increase the credibility of the data?",
"Does the report contain optimization suggestions for \"scientifically developing a catch-up plan to set expected improvement goals by completion segment\"?",
"Is the report written in strict accordance with the structure of \"Data Aggregation - Dimension Analysis - Problem Identification - Optimization Recommendations\"?",
"When marking raw data logical suspicious points, are only the suspicious points marked without modifying any original values?"
],
"rubric_types": [
"Basic Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation"
],
"file_dep_graph": [
{
"from": "review_01.txt",
"to": "2024_yearproduct_okr_review_data_integration_and_optimization_recommendations_report.pdf"
},
{
"from": "review_02.txt",
"to": "2024_yearproduct_okr_review_data_integration_and_optimization_recommendations_report.pdf"
},
{
"from": "review_03.txt",
"to": "2024_yearproduct_okr_review_data_integration_and_optimization_recommendations_report.pdf"
},
{
"from": "review_04.txt",
"to": "2024_yearproduct_okr_review_data_integration_and_optimization_recommendations_report.pdf"
},
{
"from": "review_05.txt",
"to": "2024_yearproduct_okr_review_data_integration_and_optimization_recommendations_report.pdf"
}
],
"data_manifest": [
{
"filename": "review_01.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/d35e93b6ec52fd6e_review_01.txt"
},
{
"filename": "review_02.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/cf6eb4351e2a401c_review_02.txt"
},
{
"filename": "review_03.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/60677447683d1c17_review_03.txt"
},
{
"filename": "review_04.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/8156bd4c4f3b4c26_review_04.txt"
},
{
"filename": "review_05.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/b2bc804235c22d1a_review_05.txt"
}
],
"tested_capabilities": [
"Workspace Exploration",
"Result-Providing Files Utilization"
]
}
|