File size: 6,519 Bytes
b22d1ad | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 | {
"absolute_id": 227,
"persona": "Researcher",
"task": "Based on the 2024 security report, summarize the overall data security status, outline the areas that need improvement, and generate an improvement plan document on the desktop as Data_Security_Improvement_Plan.docx.",
"task_diff": "medium",
"output_files": [
"Data_Security_Improvement_Plan_Document.docx"
],
"rubrics": [
"Were all five security report files accurately located and read?",
"Were all 10 core fields extracted from each report without omission: report ID, reporting period, total incident count, severe incident count, counts for the four incident categories, three response-time metrics, protection coverage, security score, affected user count, and budget invested?",
"Does the extracted data exactly match the source files, for example with `安全报告_3` showing a detection time of 72 minutes rather than 27 minutes, and the lowest security score correctly recorded as 68 rather than another value?",
"Were irrelevant formatting characters such as extra parentheses and line breaks removed from the extracted data?",
"Does the summary table include data from all five reports, ordered by time as two reports from May 2024, then August, September, and October, with the two May reports kept side by side in the correct order?",
"Does the analysis correctly calculate a total of 29 incidents, 4 severe incidents, and 11 data-leak incidents?",
"Does the analysis correctly calculate an average detection time of 53.6 minutes, an average response time of 114.2 minutes, and an average remediation time of 293.8 minutes?",
"Does the analysis correctly derive these four aggregate metrics: average protection coverage of 88.6%, average security score of 80.4, total affected users of 27,002, and average budget of RMB 3.254 million?",
"Does the overall analysis cover all four dimensions: incident occurrence, response efficiency, protection capability, and user impact?",
"Are all analytical conclusions based on the statistics, for example matching a 37.9% data-leak share without subjective speculation?",
"Does the document identify data leakage as the most frequent incident type with 11 cases and treat it as the highest-priority issue for improvement?",
"Does the document identify the average response time of 114.2 minutes as too long and list it as a high-priority issue?",
"Does the document identify the wide variation in protection coverage, ranging from 73% to 99%, as a high-priority issue?",
"Since all five reports mention the need to strengthen staff training, does the document list employee training as a core direction for improvement?",
"Are the issues and actions ranked clearly under three levels: Priority 1 (high risk), Priority 2 (medium risk), and Priority 3 (continuous improvement)?",
"Does every improvement measure correspond to a specific core problem, such as linking data leakage to data encryption and access control, with no orphan measures?",
"Are the improvement measures specific and measurable, such as reducing data-leak incidents by 50% and shortening average detection time to under 30 minutes, instead of using vague wording like strengthening security protection?",
"Is the total budget in the improvement plan controlled within the average budget of RMB 3.254 million, with the actual total of about RMB 3.2 million meeting the budget requirement?",
"Are the improvement measures classified into three clear, non-overlapping categories: technical protection, personnel training, and process optimization?",
"Does each improvement measure clearly specify the improvement objective, responsible party, and timeline, with complete information?",
"Is the document structure complete, including all four major parts: overall data security status summary, core improvement issues, specific improvement measures, and expected effects?",
"Are all numerical units in the summary table consistent, for example budgets kept in the `¥XXX万` format and all time values expressed in minutes?",
"Does the plan describe five expected outcomes after implementation, covering security incidents, response efficiency, protection capability, user impact, and organizational capability?",
"Is the filename exactly `Data_Security_Improvement_Plan_Document.docx`, with no typo or naming error?",
"Can the generated `.docx` file be opened normally with no content loss or garbled text?"
],
"rubric_types": [
"Basic Evaluation",
"Basic Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Process Evaluation",
"Outcome Evaluation",
"Basic Evaluation",
"Basic Evaluation"
],
"file_dep_graph": [
{
"from": "Security_Report_1.txt",
"to": "Data_Security_Improvement_Plan_Document.docx"
},
{
"from": "Security_Report_2.txt",
"to": "Data_Security_Improvement_Plan_Document.docx"
},
{
"from": "Security_Report_3.txt",
"to": "Data_Security_Improvement_Plan_Document.docx"
},
{
"from": "Security_Report_4.txt",
"to": "Data_Security_Improvement_Plan_Document.docx"
},
{
"from": "Security_Report_5.txt",
"to": "Data_Security_Improvement_Plan_Document.docx"
}
],
"data_manifest": [
{
"filename": "Security_Report_1.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/aa7e292f6ef15255_Security_Report_1.txt"
},
{
"filename": "Security_Report_2.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/6ddcc8dc1c3ea431_Security_Report_2.txt"
},
{
"filename": "Security_Report_3.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/a113603c9e032caf_Security_Report_3.txt"
},
{
"filename": "Security_Report_4.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/388776be95d80111_Security_Report_4.txt"
},
{
"filename": "Security_Report_5.txt",
"stored_relpath": "data/252059e432fa9c4f_Security_Report_5.txt"
}
],
"tested_capabilities": [
"Workspace Exploration",
"Semantic Content Relations Understanding"
]
}
|