| { |
| "schema_version": "layer2_task_v1", |
| "task_id": "data_table_paginated-mui-T04", |
| "canonical_type": "data_table_paginated", |
| "family_id": "structured_data", |
| "library": "mui", |
| "coverage": { |
| "human_available": true, |
| "human_visual_available": true, |
| "realized_available": true, |
| "agent_run_count": 4, |
| "available_run_uids": [ |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__ax_tree", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__som", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__pixel", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browser_use__browser_use" |
| ] |
| }, |
| "task_level_judgment": { |
| "overall_diagnostic_value": "high", |
| "benchmark_issue_suspected": true, |
| "benchmark_issue_note": "The instruction says to use a search box, but the supplied screenshots show no visible quick-search field in the initial view; both the human and the only successful agent appear to solve the task through a filter affordance instead.", |
| "cross_run_summary": "All three browsergym observation modes terminated immediately at step 0 by reporting the task infeasible because no search box was visible. The only success came from browser_use, which used DOM-level element discovery, opened a Name column filter, entered \"Maria Chen,\" and then selected the filtered row. The task therefore separates DOM-aware workaround behavior from perception-limited modes and exposes an instruction/affordance mismatch.", |
| "primary_task_story": "This task is diagnostic because it is nominally a simple table-search-and-select flow, yet the visible UI does not obviously expose the promised search box. The human and successful agent both navigate an alternate filtering path, while three other runs fail without acting, making the task a strong probe of observability and benchmark wording rather than row-selection skill alone.", |
| "keep_revise_expand_retire_hint": "revise", |
| "keep_revise_reason": "Keep the task because it usefully differentiates observability regimes, but revise the wording or UI so the intended control is actually visible, or explicitly allow column-filter workflows.", |
| "confidence": "high", |
| "uncertainty_note": "The exact control clicked by the human at step 2 is not fully labeled in the packet, but the screenshots and successful agent trace consistently indicate a filter popover rather than a visible quick-search box." |
| }, |
| "cross_run_analysis": { |
| "dominant_failure_family": "benchmark_issue", |
| "secondary_failure_families": [ |
| "grounding" |
| ], |
| "likely_grounding_limited": true, |
| "likely_skill_fixable": true, |
| "likely_recovery_limited": false, |
| "why": "The dominant pattern is not looping or misuse after interaction; it is immediate infeasibility reports caused by a mismatch between the instruction and the initially observable UI. In the browsergym ax_tree, som, and pixel runs, the agent never begins exploration because the promised search box is absent from its observation. The successful browser_use run shows the task is solvable, but only by finding an alternative filter entry point through richer DOM access. That makes the benchmark setup and wording the main issue, with grounding limitations amplifying the failures.", |
| "evidence_run_uids": [ |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__ax_tree", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__som", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__pixel", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browser_use__browser_use" |
| ], |
| "evidence_step_refs": [ |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__ax_tree:0", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__som:0", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__pixel:0", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browser_use__browser_use:1", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browser_use__browser_use:3", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browser_use__browser_use:4", |
| "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browser_use__browser_use:6" |
| ] |
| }, |
| "run_observations": [ |
| { |
| "run_uid": "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__ax_tree", |
| "model_family": "gemini", |
| "model_name": "gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite", |
| "framework": "browsergym", |
| "mode": "ax_tree", |
| "success": false, |
| "primary_failure_family": "benchmark_issue", |
| "secondary_failure_tags": [ |
| "instruction_mismatch", |
| "premature_terminate", |
| "state_not_observed" |
| ], |
| "human_vs_agent_difference": "The human explored and then opened a filter workflow before typing the name, while this run stopped at step 0 because the accessibility tree did not expose a visible search box.", |
| "failure_or_success_narrative": "At step 0 the agent immediately reported the task infeasible, explicitly stating that the search box was not visible in the provided page structure. This matches the screenshot evidence that the initial view lacks an obvious search field, but differs from the human reference, which proceeded through a filter interaction rather than quitting.", |
| "repair_suggestion": "Revise the task text to mention filtering rather than a visible search box, or ensure the quick filter input is exposed in the initial UI and accessibility tree.", |
| "is_skill_fixable": true, |
| "is_grounding_limited": true, |
| "is_benchmark_issue": true, |
| "first_divergence_human_step": 0, |
| "first_divergence_agent_step": 0, |
| "evidence_step_ids": [ |
| 0 |
| ], |
| "evidence_image_paths": [], |
| "confidence": "high", |
| "uncertainty_note": "The exact hidden control the human uses is inferred from later filter-entry steps and screenshots, not from a fully labeled UI dump." |
| }, |
| { |
| "run_uid": "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__som", |
| "model_family": "gemini", |
| "model_name": "gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite", |
| "framework": "browsergym", |
| "mode": "som", |
| "success": false, |
| "primary_failure_family": "benchmark_issue", |
| "secondary_failure_tags": [ |
| "instruction_mismatch", |
| "premature_terminate", |
| "state_not_observed" |
| ], |
| "human_vs_agent_difference": "The human kept interacting until a filter input appeared, but the SOM run declared failure immediately because it could not see any search box in the starting table view.", |
| "failure_or_success_narrative": "This run terminated after a single infeasibility report saying it could not find a search box in the Users table. The contact sheet shows the same bare table view with no obvious quick-search field, so the agent followed the instruction literally and never attempted the alternative filter path that the successful trajectories use.", |
| "repair_suggestion": "Either expose the intended search widget visually in the default viewport or instruct agents that a column filter path is acceptable.", |
| "is_skill_fixable": true, |
| "is_grounding_limited": true, |
| "is_benchmark_issue": true, |
| "first_divergence_human_step": 0, |
| "first_divergence_agent_step": 0, |
| "evidence_step_ids": [ |
| 0 |
| ], |
| "evidence_image_paths": [], |
| "confidence": "high", |
| "uncertainty_note": "The SOM evidence only covers the immediate abort, so there is no direct proof it would have failed after exploration." |
| }, |
| { |
| "run_uid": "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browsergym__pixel", |
| "model_family": "gemini", |
| "model_name": "gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite", |
| "framework": "browsergym", |
| "mode": "pixel", |
| "success": false, |
| "primary_failure_family": "benchmark_issue", |
| "secondary_failure_tags": [ |
| "instruction_mismatch", |
| "premature_terminate", |
| "state_not_observed" |
| ], |
| "human_vs_agent_difference": "Unlike the human, which clicked into a filtering flow and selected the resulting row, the pixel run never acted because the starting image did not reveal the promised search box.", |
| "failure_or_success_narrative": "The pixel agent also stopped at step 0 with an infeasibility report that the search box was not visible. The attached screenshot supports that claim: the initial grid view shows headers, rows, and the target chip, but no clearly visible search input. The task therefore punishes literal perception of the UI even though a hidden or alternate filter path exists.", |
| "repair_suggestion": "Make the quick filter visibly rendered in the initial frame, or relax the instruction to say 'filter the table' instead of 'use the search box.'", |
| "is_skill_fixable": true, |
| "is_grounding_limited": true, |
| "is_benchmark_issue": true, |
| "first_divergence_human_step": 0, |
| "first_divergence_agent_step": 0, |
| "evidence_step_ids": [ |
| 0 |
| ], |
| "evidence_image_paths": [], |
| "confidence": "high", |
| "uncertainty_note": "No intermediate pixel actions are available because the run terminates immediately." |
| }, |
| { |
| "run_uid": "gemini__gemini-3.1-flash-lite__browser_use__browser_use", |
| "model_family": "gemini", |
| "model_name": "gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite", |
| "framework": "browser_use", |
| "mode": "browser_use", |
| "success": true, |
| "primary_failure_family": "none", |
| "secondary_failure_tags": [], |
| "human_vs_agent_difference": "Both trajectories succeeded, but the agent relied on DOM querying and then used a Name-column filter popover, whereas the human reference is described more generically as clicking Filter and typing the target name.", |
| "failure_or_success_narrative": "The run navigated to the page, searched the DOM for text inputs, found none, then adapted by clicking a column-menu control for Name. It entered \"Maria Chen\" into the resulting filter input, pressed Enter, and clicked the remaining row checkbox. The contact sheet confirms the filter popover and the final one-row selected state, showing a successful workaround despite the missing visible search box.", |
| "repair_suggestion": "Use this successful path as evidence to revise the benchmark wording and to add alternate-valid solution notes in evaluation.", |
| "is_skill_fixable": true, |
| "is_grounding_limited": false, |
| "is_benchmark_issue": true, |
| "first_divergence_human_step": null, |
| "first_divergence_agent_step": null, |
| "evidence_step_ids": [ |
| 1, |
| 3, |
| 4, |
| 5, |
| 6 |
| ], |
| "evidence_image_paths": [], |
| "confidence": "high", |
| "uncertainty_note": "The exact mapping between browser_use element indices and on-screen controls is inferred from the trace text and contact sheet, but the overall sequence is clear." |
| } |
| ], |
| "interesting_observation": "The only successful run effectively solved a different task than the instruction describes: it never found a visible search box and instead converted the problem into a column-filter workflow, which explains why DOM-rich access succeeds while perception-only modes abort.", |
| "paper_useful_quote": "In this MUI DataGrid task, three browsergym modes aborted at step 0 because no search box was perceptible, while the lone successful browser_use run completed the task by opening the Name column filter and selecting the filtered row." |
| } |
