Unnamed: 0 int64 0 1.22k | Case Name stringlengths 19 239 | Input stringlengths 1.35k 6.73k | Output stringlengths 105 57.5k | Label int64 0 1 | Count int64 258 107k | text stringlengths 1.54k 6.88k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | Dir. Gen. Of Inc.Tax(Inv) Pune Vs. M/S. Spacewood Funishers Pvt. Ltd. | affidavit filed before it were at variance with what was revealed by the satisfaction note(s) placed before the Court. Even if the satisfaction notes alone are to be gone by, the essential details with regard to source of information; the persons who were interrogated and with whom discreet enquiries were made are not ... | 1[ds]13. In the present case the satisfaction note(s) leading to the issuing of the warrant of authorization against thewere placed before the High Court. As it would appear from the impugned order the contents thereof were exhaustively reproduced by the High Court. The said satisfaction note(s) have also been placed b... | 1 | 4,570 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the legal arguments presented and estimate the likelihood of the court accepting (1) or rejecting (0) the petition.
### Input:
affidavit filed before it were at variance with what was revealed by the satisfaction note(s) placed before the Court. Even if the satisfaction notes alone are to be g... |
1 | Tusi and Ors Vs. Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. and Ors | 1. Leave granted.2. Heard Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Rohit K. Sinha, learned Counsel for the Respondent.3. The husband of the Appellant met with an accident and sustained injuries to which he ultimately succumbed. The wife, the minor child and the parents as claimants instituted ... | 1[ds]6. On a perusal of the order passed by the High Court we find that no reason has been ascribed. In fact, it is an extremely cryptic order. In our considered opinion the learned Single Judge would have been well advised to ascribe some reasons if it was of the view that the amount deserved to be reduced. There has ... | 1 | 472 | ### Instruction:
From the information provided in the case proceeding, infer whether the court's decision will be positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant.
### Input:
1. Leave granted.2. Heard Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Rohit K. Sinha, learned Counsel for the Respondent.3.... |
2 | Commissioner of Income Tax, Kerala Vs. N.A. Mohamed Haneef | HEGDE, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment of the High Court of Kerala in Income-tax Referred Case No. 11 of 1967 on its file The facts of the case lie within a narrow compass. The assessee carried on business as tin fabricator and oil miller. For the previous year ending on December 31, 1959, he ... | 0[ds]In view of the decision of this court in Commissioner ofv. Anwar Ali, the decision of the High Court on the facts of the case must be held to be correct.There is no basis for coming to a firm conclusion that the assessee deliberately supplied wrong particulars | 0 | 422 | ### Instruction:
From the information provided in the case proceeding, infer whether the court's decision will be positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant.
### Input:
HEGDE, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment of the High Court of Kerala in Income-tax Referred Case No. 11 of 1967 on its fil... |
3 | State of Karnataka and Ors Vs. Krishna Kumar and Ors | appointed is less, the candidate has to teach Science and Mathematics subjects for 6th and 7th standards, to make up the workload. 6. The learned senior Counsel has further pointed out that since the hybrid category of higher primary schools was created, the matter was strictly not governed by the provisions of the Act... | 1[ds]8. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that the SSA Scheme is an independent scheme and considering its imperative, certain primary schools were upgraded to and styled as higher primary schools. The Class 8 was also added in such schools. The hybrid category of prima... | 1 | 1,721 | ### Instruction:
Using the case data, forecast whether the court is likely to side with (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner.
### Input:
appointed is less, the candidate has to teach Science and Mathematics subjects for 6th and 7th standards, to make up the workload. 6. The learned senior Counsel has further po... |
4 | M/S Kabaini Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Of Orissa | grant of lease beyond fifty hectares before commencement of production on confirmation received from the financing institution or the Deputy Director of Mines or the Mining Officer. (iii) a person who is a raiyat of the land;(iv) any other category;Provided that in the case of an applicant under category (iii) or (iv) ... | 0[ds]The present case relates to priority as provided in the said Sub-rule. It provides for priority to a person who has already set up an industry for processing of such minor minerals. From the documents placed on record more particularly the letter of the Corporation dated 23.5.2003 it is clear that M/s Valley Grani... | 0 | 2,328 | ### Instruction:
From the information provided in the case proceeding, infer whether the court's decision will be positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant.
### Input:
grant of lease beyond fifty hectares before commencement of production on confirmation received from the financing institution or the Deputy Direc... |
5 | A. Vishwanath Rao Vs. State of Mysore & Others | contention of the appellants that in the draft scheme the maximum number of vehicles and daily services was specified and not the minimum, but in the final scheme approved under Section 68-D of the Motor Vehicles Act there was specification of the minimum number of vehicles and daily services in respect of the route in... | 0[ds]4. On behalf of the appellants it was contended, in the first place, that the provisions of Section 20 ofthe Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950 were not complied with and the final scheme published by respondent No 1 was ultra vires.We are unable to accept this argument as correct. It is not necessary to examin... | 0 | 2,907 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case proceedings and provide a prediction: is the court likely to rule in favor of (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner?
### Input:
contention of the appellants that in the draft scheme the maximum number of vehicles and daily services was specified and not the minimum, but in the fi... |
6 | Anand Swarup Singh Vs. State of Punjab | K.S. Hegde, J. 1. This is a plaintiffs appeal. The plaintiff joined as Naib Tahsildar in Patiala State on June 14, 1930. He was removed from service on January 20, 1949. His representation against his removal was rejected. Thereafter on October 25, 1965, he filed a civil suit for recovery of arrears of pension, said to... | 1[ds]From this it is clear that in the appeal the State of Punjab merely disputed the plaintiffs right to claim arrears of pension for six years, but conceded his right to claim pension for three years immediately preceding the suit. But curiously enough at the time of the hearing of the appeal everyone appears to have... | 1 | 543 | ### Instruction:
Considering the arguments and evidence in case proceeding, predict the verdict: is it more likely to be in favor (1) or against (0) the appellant?
### Input:
K.S. Hegde, J. 1. This is a plaintiffs appeal. The plaintiff joined as Naib Tahsildar in Patiala State on June 14, 1930. He was removed from ser... |
7 | Smt. Rukmanibai Gupta Vs. Collector Jabalpur and Others | payment of rent or royalty payable under the lease deed. Therefore, Clause 15 read as a whole provides for referring future disputes to the arbitration of the Governor. Arbitration agreement is not required to be in any particular form. What is required to be ascertained is whether the parties have agreed that if dispu... | 0[ds]A quarry lease is granted under the relevant Minor Mineral Rules by the State Government. The State is thus the lessor and the one who takes the quarry lease is the lessee. As required by Article 299 of the Constitution, all contracts made in exercise of the executive power of the State shall be expressed to be ma... | 0 | 2,477 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
payment of rent or royalty payable under the lease deed. Therefore, Clause 15 read as a whole provides for referring future disputes to the arbitration of the Gover... |
8 | State Bank Of India Vs. Ghamandi Ram (Dead) Through Shri Gurbax Rai | the juristic nature of the Hindu joint family, according to the doctrine of Mitakshara, we are of the opinion that the Hindu joint family firm of Ghamandi Ram Gurbax Rai cannot be treated as an individual within the meaning of the notification of the Pakistan Government dated 19th February, 1952, but the said firm must... | 1[ds]Having regard to the juristic nature of the Hindu joint family, according to the doctrine of Mitakshara, we are of the opinion that the Hindu joint family firm of Ghamandi Ram Gurbax Rai cannot be treated as an individual within the meaning of the notification of the Pakistan Government dated 19th February, 1952, ... | 1 | 3,497 | ### Instruction:
From the information provided in the case proceeding, infer whether the court's decision will be positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant.
### Input:
the juristic nature of the Hindu joint family, according to the doctrine of Mitakshara, we are of the opinion that the Hindu joint family firm of ... |
9 | Union Of India Vs. Central India Machinery Manufacturing Co. Ltd. & Others | property of the company before its delivery to the purchaser. But as pointed out by Lord Halsbury in the above-quoted passage from his renowned work neither the ownership of the materials nor the value of the skill and labour as compared with the value of the materials used in the manufacture is conclusive. Nevertheles... | 0[ds]The real intention of the contracting parties is primarily to be sought within the four corners of the documents containing the Standard and Special Conditions of Contract. If such intention is clearly discernible from these documents, it will not be proper to seek external aid from the stereotyped indemnity bond ... | 0 | 8,102 | ### Instruction:
Scrutinize the evidence and arguments in the case proceeding to predict the court's decision: will the appeal be granted (1) or denied (0)?
### Input:
property of the company before its delivery to the purchaser. But as pointed out by Lord Halsbury in the above-quoted passage from his renowned work ne... |
10 | K.P. Varghese Vs. The Income Tax Officer,Ernakulam, And Another | 48 which provides the mode of computation and under which the starting point of computation is the full value of the consideration received or accruing . What in fact never accrued or was never received cannot be computed as capital gains under s.48. Therefore, sub-s. (2) cannot be construed as bringing within the comp... | 1[ds]This argument was based on a strictly literal relief s. 52, subs. (2), but we do not think such a construction can be accepted. It ignores several vital considerations which must always be borne in mind when we are interpreting a statutory provision. The task of interpretation of statutory enactment is not a mecha... | 1 | 10,446 | ### Instruction:
Scrutinize the evidence and arguments in the case proceeding to predict the court's decision: will the appeal be granted (1) or denied (0)?
### Input:
48 which provides the mode of computation and under which the starting point of computation is the full value of the consideration received or accruing... |
11 | Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Ram Sarup | Shinghal, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated September 4, 1972, dismissing the appeal of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi against the acquittal of respondent Ram Sarup and upholding his acquittal by the appellate judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge of ... | 1[ds]4. In the view we have taken we would have set aside the acquittal of the respondent and restored the judgment of the trial Court, but we are inclined to think that it will not be proper to do so in the facts and circumstances of this case. There is nothing in the three judgments on record, and more particularly i... | 1 | 899 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
Shinghal, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated September 4, 1972, dismissing the appeal of the Munici... |
12 | Boothalinga Agencies Vs. V. T. C. Poriaswami Nadar | and reasonable in the new situation.""The day is gone," the learned Judge went on to say "when we can excuse an unforeseen injustice by saying to the sufferer it is your own folly, you ought not to have passed that form of words. You ought to have put in a clause to protect yourself. We no longer credit a party with th... | 1[ds]1. Notification No. 23-ITC/43, dated the 1st July, 1943, issued by the late Department of Commerce, as amended.Notification No. 2-ITC/48, dated 6th March, 1948, issued by the late Ministry of Commerce.8. On the basis of these provisions was contended by Mr. Gokhale on behalf of the appellant that the contract whic... | 1 | 5,904 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the arguments and evidence in the case and predict the verdict: is an acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appeal more probable?
### Input:
and reasonable in the new situation.""The day is gone," the learned Judge went on to say "when we can excuse an unforeseen injustice by saying to the s... |
13 | Prem Chand Somchand Shah and Another Vs. Union of India and Another | provide an exception to the rule and to declare that an importer might import a canalised item directly. It is in that sense and that sense only that the court could have intended to define the entitlement of diamond exporters. They would be entitled to import items which were canalised or not if the import policy prev... | 0[ds]7. Shri Salve has invited our attention to the Import Licence dated November 21, 1988 issued in favour of M/s. Suraj Diamonds Industries Pvt. Ltd. wherein it is stated that this licence is valid for import of items as per para 215 of Import and Export Policy 1988-91 subject to restrictions/conditions laid down the... | 0 | 6,564 | ### Instruction:
Examine the details of the case proceeding and forecast if the appeal/petition stands a chance of being upheld (1) or dismissed (0).
### Input:
provide an exception to the rule and to declare that an importer might import a canalised item directly. It is in that sense and that sense only that the cour... |
14 | The Pioneer Limited Vs. V.S. Tajdar Hussain (Dead) & Others | the fact that there has been a contravention of S.6 (i) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, by the appellant management being represented by Mr. O. P. Vatsa. This question loomed very large, as is seen from the elaborate discussion contained in the judgment of the learned Single Judge. Though it was contended on behal... | 1[ds]n behalf of the appellant, it has been represented before us by Mr. B. P. Maheshwari, learned counsel, that his clients are prepared to pay to the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.1 the retrenchment compensation amount due to the deceased workman under S.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act as als... | 1 | 1,457 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the legal arguments presented and estimate the likelihood of the court accepting (1) or rejecting (0) the petition.
### Input:
the fact that there has been a contravention of S.6 (i) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, by the appellant management being represented by Mr. O. P. Vatsa. This que... |
15 | M/s. Mund & Samont Company Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar & Orissa | 11,436/- out of the remuneration paid to the Managing Director and Deputy Managing Director in accordance with the provisions of the Articles of Association of the Company?"The High Court held that the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction under Section 10 (4-A) to disallow a part of the remuneration, and that the disall... | 0[ds]We have accepted the undertaking given by the Advocate on record to file a special leavethe Articles of Association, the rate of remuneration to be paid to the Managing Director and the Deputy Managing Director was fixed. The case was clearly covered by the terms for Section 10 (4A), and theOfficer had jurisdictio... | 0 | 1,418 | ### Instruction:
Delve into the case proceeding and predict the outcome: is the judgment expected to be in support (1) or in denial (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
11,436/- out of the remuneration paid to the Managing Director and Deputy Managing Director in accordance with the provisions of the Articles of Association ... |
16 | Edward Keventer Pvt.Ltd Vs. Bihar State Agrl.Mkt.Board | the tray packing machine, where it is accumulated in trays. The said tray containing the fruit drink pack is then shrink wrapped by means of the shrink wrapper machine. After everything is completed, the fruit drink packs are kept under incubation for a period of seven days for detection of growth of any microorganism,... | 1[ds]5. A perusal of Section 2(1)(a) unambiguously shows that the agricultural produce which are to be covered by the sweep of the Act necessarily has to be specified in the Schedule. If any agricultural produce is not specified in the Schedule, it goes beyond the purview of the Act and respondent has no power to levy ... | 1 | 2,084 | ### Instruction:
Examine the details of the case proceeding and forecast if the appeal/petition stands a chance of being upheld (1) or dismissed (0).
### Input:
the tray packing machine, where it is accumulated in trays. The said tray containing the fruit drink pack is then shrink wrapped by means of the shrink wrappe... |
17 | DINESH KUMAR KASHYAP Vs. SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY | panel. Just because discretion is vested in the authority, it does not mean that this discretion can be exercised arbitrarily. No doubt, it is not incumbent upon the employer to fill all the posts but it must give reasons and satisfy the court that it had some grounds for not appointing the candidates who found place i... | 1[ds]No doubt, it is true, that mere selection does not give any vested right to the selected candidate to be appointed. At the same time when a large number of posts are lying vacant and selection process has been followed then the employer must satisfy the court as to why it did not resort to and appoint the selected... | 1 | 2,015 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
panel. Just because discretion is vested in the authority, it does not mean that this discretion can be exercised arbitrarily. No doubt, it is not incumbent up... |
18 | Messrs The Andhra Bank Limited, Hyderabad Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P. Iii, Hyderabad | not exceeding the amount required under the provisions of Section 17 to be so transferred. Any other sum transferred to a reserve fund under the direction of Reserve Bank or any other law will not qualify for deduction. For example, under the Banking Regulation Act, a bank has to maintain a cash reserve under Section 1... | 1[ds]This letter is in the nature of advice and contains direction as to how profit should be calculated before transfer of the requisite 20% is made to the reserve fund. Banks having reserves equal to or in excess of their paid-up capital should transfer 20% of the profits after making the usual provisions and after d... | 1 | 2,101 | ### Instruction:
Delve into the case proceeding and predict the outcome: is the judgment expected to be in support (1) or in denial (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
not exceeding the amount required under the provisions of Section 17 to be so transferred. Any other sum transferred to a reserve fund under the direction of... |
19 | District Mining Officer and others Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co. & Others | that pattern of validation, as indicated by Mr. Parasaran, may not be a clinching factor in construing the provisions of the Act, but at the same time the fact that in Joara Sugar Mills case as well as in some other cases, while validating, laws have been enacted and saving clause has been provided which are in pari ma... | 0[ds]t us now examine the question, as to whether the Statute is a temporary Stature or not ?When we examine this question in the cse in hand, we are not examining the Validation Act, but we are required to examine the relevant provisions of the different State laws, included in the Schedule to the Validation Act, whic... | 0 | 17,159 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
that pattern of validation, as indicated by Mr. Parasaran, may not be a clinching factor in construing the provisions of the Act, but at the same time the fact... |
20 | Tax Officer-Cum-Regional Transport Officer Raipur, and Others Vs. Durg Transport Company Private Limited | passenger tax under the Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles (Taxation of Passengers) Act, 1959, hereinafter referred to as "the Act". It is said that it failed to pay the tax due from it for the period from October 1, 1961, to May 6, 1962. Admittedly, it submitted no return as required by section 5 of the Act, nor did it mak... | 0[ds]This contention does not appeal to us. In our opinion, when the liability to pay tax is evaded by one method or other there is an escapement of assessment. The term "escaped assessment " includes botht as well as. When a person is not assessed to tax though he is liable to be taxed he escapes assessment2. We are u... | 0 | 1,155 | ### Instruction:
Review the case details and predict the decision: will the court accept (1) or deny (0) the appeal/petition?
### Input:
passenger tax under the Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles (Taxation of Passengers) Act, 1959, hereinafter referred to as "the Act". It is said that it failed to pay the tax due from it f... |
21 | Food Corporation Of India Through Its Districtmanager, Fari Vs. Makhan Singh And Anr. Etc.Etc | Road. It is evidently close to the DAV College. Besides, it surrounds the office of the Market Committee. As observed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court the grain market land covered by award Ex. A-24 had a better access and better potential than the land under acquisition. Obviously the two lands could not ... | 1[ds]are not inclined to agree with Mr. Sachar for three reasons. In the first place, it is evident that in the references sought the claimant-land-owners themselves had impleaded the F.C.I. and the State of Punjab as contesting parties. Before the Additional District Judge, the F.C.I. was keen contestant. Having suffe... | 1 | 5,299 | ### Instruction:
Based on the legal narrative and evidentiary details in the case proceeding, predict the court's stance: favorable (1) or unfavorable (0) to the appellant.
### Input:
Road. It is evidently close to the DAV College. Besides, it surrounds the office of the Market Committee. As observed by the learned Si... |
22 | P. Chinnanna & Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Others | Government so directs, the Collector, though no such award has been made, may, on the expiration of fifteen days from the publication of the notice mentioned in Section 9, sub-section (1), take possession of any land needed for public purpose. Such land shall thereupon vest absolutely in the Government, free from all e... | 0[ds]Hence, we feel that there is no need to set aside the impugned declaration inasmuch as the earlier acquisition was complete and had resulted in vesting of the land in the State Government and there was no land available for acquisition in the subsequent proceedings which have been carried pursuant to the judgment ... | 0 | 4,169 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
Government so directs, the Collector, though no such award has been made, may, on the expiration of fifteen days from the publication of the notice mentioned in Section 9, sub-section (... |
23 | Uniflex Cables Ltd Vs. Commnr., Central Excise, Surat-Ii | duty amounting to Rs.66,92,604/-. According to the Authorities, the electric cables were neither parts nor specially designed devices, which were necessary for manufacturing or running wind mills. For the aforestated reasons, according to the authorities, benefit under the aforestated notification could not have been a... | 1[ds]The order passed by the Tribunal in NICCO CORPORATION LIMITED (supra) was appealed against in C.A. No 1118/2001 before this Court. This Court, vide its order dated 22.3.06 dismissed the appeal and held that insulated electrical cables designed for use in wind mills would not be eligible for exemption under notific... | 1 | 1,434 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
duty amounting to Rs.66,92,604/-. According to the Authorities, the electric cables were neither parts nor specially designed devices, which were necessary for manufacturing or running ... |
24 | Gajanan Samadhan Lande Vs. Sanjay Shyamrao Dhotre | functions of the elected Director of the Corporation.5. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the High Court framed 14 issues. The appellant examined two witnesses, including himself and tendered documentary evidence. On the other hand, the returned candidate examined himself and one more witness who was Deputy... | 0[ds]In the first place, the returned candidate was holding an elected office and not an office by appointment. The test of appointment is decisive. The Government had nothing to do in the election of Director from the Growers constituency. Moreover, being an elected office, the Government has no power to remove the re... | 0 | 1,466 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the legal arguments presented and estimate the likelihood of the court accepting (1) or rejecting (0) the petition.
### Input:
functions of the elected Director of the Corporation.5. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the High Court framed 14 issues. The appellant examined two witne... |
25 | Fazal Bhai Dhala Vs. Custodian-General Of Evacueeproperty, Delhi | serve the notice would be fatal; where however proper hearing can be given without service or notice, it does not matter at all, and all that has to be seen is whether even though no notice was given a reasonable opportunity of being heard was given.8. A perusal of the Custodians judgment makes it reasonably clear that... | 0[ds]it is clear that the only jurisdiction the Custodian could exercise, in the absence of any appeal against that portion of the Assistant Custodians order would be his revisional jurisdiction under S. 26. When we find that the custodian has made the order it is proper and reasonable to hold that he passed it in the ... | 0 | 3,274 | ### Instruction:
Using the case data, forecast whether the court is likely to side with (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner.
### Input:
serve the notice would be fatal; where however proper hearing can be given without service or notice, it does not matter at all, and all that has to be seen is whether even th... |
26 | M/s Ganges Waterproof Works (P) Ltd Vs. Union of India | and have been turned down. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are also of the opinion that here too the petitioner must meet the same fate. 3. As to the first contention the learned Single Judge had perused the record of the arbitration proceedings made available to the Court by the Arbitration. The l... | 0[ds]5. As to the second contention, we have perused the contents of the Award dated 23rd August, 1982. It is aaward. Just before recording the finding, the learned Arbitrator has stated "And Whereas I heard and examined and considered the statements of the parties and their evidence". It is the use of the word `eviden... | 0 | 1,409 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the arguments and evidence in the case and predict the verdict: is an acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appeal more probable?
### Input:
and have been turned down. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are also of the opinion that here too the petitioner must meet the same... |
27 | Anna Transport Corporation Ltd Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Dharmapuri & Ors | directed further that the revision petitioners before it as well as the present appellant Corporation would continue to provide transport facilities on the route in question until the disposal of the renewal applications of the revision petitioners.2. The facts of the three appeals are quite simple and are not in contr... | 1[ds]It is not in controversy that sub-section (1A) or sub-section (1C) of section 68F are not applicable to the controversy. The rest of sub-section (1D) provides that no permit shall be granted or "renewed" during the period intervening between the date of publication under section 68C of any scheme and the date of p... | 1 | 1,201 | ### Instruction:
Based on the legal narrative and evidentiary details in the case proceeding, predict the court's stance: favorable (1) or unfavorable (0) to the appellant.
### Input:
directed further that the revision petitioners before it as well as the present appellant Corporation would continue to provide transpo... |
28 | Prakash Chand Maheshwari & Anr Vs. Zila Parishad, Muzaffarnagar & Ors | of the notification under Section 120 (3) of the Act of 1922.23. The last point raised by the petitioners relates to the appointment of the Kar Adhikari on the ground that it was not done in consultation with either the Public Service Commission of the State or any other Commission or body appointed in that behalf by t... | 1[ds]Clearly, that case is distinguishable from the facts of the case before us. In this case the impost remained the same between the passing of the Government of India Act, 1935 and the commencement of the Constitution. The amendment of Section 108 of the U. P. District Boards Act of 1922 in 1948 only allowed the con... | 1 | 6,492 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
of the notification under Section 120 (3) of the Act of 1922.23. The last point raised by the petitioners relates to the appointment of the Kar ... |
29 | The Hukam Chand Mills Ltd., Indore Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay | said to accrue or arise in British India ? (3) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the applicants case, the Tribunal was right in holding that a proportionate part of the profits determined on sales grouped under items 3, 4, 5 and 9 in the assessment order by the application of rule 33 was assessable to in... | 1[ds]The Tribunal also gave a finding that the assessee maintained an organisation in British India, that that organisation was interested in bringing to the notice of the British Indian merchants, brokers and consuming public the goods manufactured by the assessee-company and that the ground-work for sales effected in... | 1 | 1,745 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the arguments and evidence in the case and predict the verdict: is an acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appeal more probable?
### Input:
said to accrue or arise in British India ? (3) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the applicants case, the Tribunal was right in holding ... |
30 | Ramesh Harijan Vs. State of U.P | Singh v. State by Public Prosecutor, (2009) 6 SCC 462. Thus, the law can be summarised to the effect that the evidence of a hostile witness cannot be discarded as a whole, and relevant parts thereof which are admissible in law, can be used by the prosecution or the defence. (See also: C. Muniappan & Ors. v. State of Ta... | 0[ds]In the aforesaid fact-situation, we have to weigh as to whether the High Court is justified in reversing the judgment and order of acquittal recorded by the trialhave been taken through the entire evidence on record and after re-appreciating the same we can unhesitatingly record that:(i) Undoubtedly, the trial cou... | 0 | 4,922 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
Singh v. State by Public Prosecutor, (2009) 6 SCC 462. Thus, the law can be summarised to the effect that the evidence of a hostile witness cannot be discarded as a... |
31 | K.C. Builders & Another Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax | addition was deleted by the Tribunal:Held, that it was evident from the material on record that the penalty had been imposed solely on the basis of the additional of Rs. 4 lakhs to the assessee’s income. If the addition was deleted, the charge of concealment of income could not be sustained. Imposition of penalty under... | 1[ds]27. The above judgment squarely applies to the facts and circumstances of the case on hand. In this case also, similarly, the application was moved by the assessee before the Magistrate to drop the criminal proceedings which were dismissed by the Magistrate and the High Court also on a petition filed under Section... | 1 | 6,677 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case proceedings and provide a prediction: is the court likely to rule in favor of (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner?
### Input:
addition was deleted by the Tribunal:Held, that it was evident from the material on record that the penalty had been imposed solely on the basis of the ... |
32 | Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd Vs. Union Of India & Anr | constitute a restrictive trade practice.There is also another infirmity invalidating the order dated 14th May, 1976. We have already pointed out and that is clear from the decision of this court in the Telcos case [1977] 47 Comp Cas 520 (SC) that in an inquiry under s. 37 the Commission has first to be satisfied that t... | 1[ds]It is true that a clause in an agreement may embody a trade practice and such trade practice may have the actual or probable effect of restricting, lessening or destroying competition and hence it may constitute a restrictive trade practice and the clause may be voided, but it is difficult to see how the introduct... | 1 | 19,992 | ### Instruction:
Based on the legal narrative and evidentiary details in the case proceeding, predict the court's stance: favorable (1) or unfavorable (0) to the appellant.
### Input:
constitute a restrictive trade practice.There is also another infirmity invalidating the order dated 14th May, 1976. We have already po... |
33 | C. JAYACHANDRAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA & ORS. ETC | delay in deciding the representation by the High Court cannot defeat the rights of the appellant to claim seniority from the date the other candidates selected in pursuance of the same selection process. 42. Still further, the Division Bench of the High Court has completely erred in law in holding that the appellant ha... | 1[ds]36. The earlier writ petition filed by the appellant was allowed on 13 th September, 2010. The Division Bench of the High Court has directed to re-cast the seniority amongst the seven shortlisted candidates. The appellant was one of them. The challenge to the said order by three affected candidates remained unsucc... | 1 | 9,457 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
delay in deciding the representation by the High Court cannot defeat the rights of the appellant to claim seniority from the date the other candidates selected in p... |
34 | Karam Singh Sobti & Anr Vs. Shri Pratap Chand & Anr | the substantive provision contained in sub-s. (2) and the only way of harmonising the two is to accept the view which the Punjab High Court has accepted, namely, that the words "shall have regard to the provisions of this Act merely mean that "where the new Act has slightly modified or clarified the previous provisions... | 1[ds]Two questions arise out of S. 57 . It is clear beyond dispute that had(2) of S.57 stood by itself, then the present case would be governed by the provisions of the Control Act of 1952, assuming that an application in revision is a proceeding within the meaning of theThere are however two provisos to(2) of S.57. It... | 1 | 3,969 | ### Instruction:
Examine the case narrative and anticipate the court's decision: will it result in an approval (1) or disapproval (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
the substantive provision contained in sub-s. (2) and the only way of harmonising the two is to accept the view which the Punjab High Court has accepted, namel... |
35 | Sangat Singh Vs. Ch. Perma Nand Bahl & Others | Rent Control Act, 1958 the suit was not maintainable in the Civil Court and that in any event the notice served upon the appellant did not operate to terminate the tenancy. These contentions were rejected by the Trial Court and a decree in ejectment was passed. The decree was confirmed in appeal to the District Court a... | 1[ds]4. The respondents contended that the Civil Court had jurisdiction because the premises belonged to theThe appellant contended that the premises at the date of the institution of the suit did not belong to the Government and that in any event they were let to him by the respondents "by virtue of an agreement with ... | 1 | 1,360 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
Rent Control Act, 1958 the suit was not maintainable in the Civil Court and that in any event the notice served upon the appellant did not operate to terminate the tenancy. These conten... |
36 | CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. SIRAJ UDDIN KHAN | 1986 which had directed that the respondent be paid 50% of the back wages for the period from 17-10-1985 to 10-11-1995 should be complied with.9. The learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that as the respondent had not attended to his duties for almost 15 years despite having been called upon to do so repea... | 1[ds]A perusal of the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 29.05.2015 indicates that although learned Single Judge has set aside the order dated 26.06.2012, but there was no order for payment of back wages or consequential benefits. Learned Single Judge has set aside the order dated 26.06.2012 and has left the matter... | 1 | 5,260 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
1986 which had directed that the respondent be paid 50% of the back wages for the period from 17-10-1985 to 10-11-1995 should be complied with.9. The learned counse... |
37 | NATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI & ANR | obligation to deduct TDS is limited to appropriate proportion of income chargeable to tax under the IT Act that forms part of the gross sum of money payable to the non-resident. A person paying any sum to a non-resident is not liable to deduct any tax at source if such sum is not chargeable to tax under the IT Act, as ... | 0[ds]36. It is well settled that the obligation to deduct TDS is limited to appropriate proportion of income chargeable to tax under the IT Act that forms part of the gross sum of money payable to the non-resident. A person paying any sum to a non-resident is not liable to deduct any tax at source if such sum is not ch... | 0 | 5,339 | ### Instruction:
Using the case data, forecast whether the court is likely to side with (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner.
### Input:
obligation to deduct TDS is limited to appropriate proportion of income chargeable to tax under the IT Act that forms part of the gross sum of money payable to the non-residen... |
38 | The New Maneck Chowk Spinning And Weaving Co., Ltd Vs. The Textile Labour Association,Ahmedabad | so-called goodwill bonus, for that bonus depends upon the goodwill of the parties and on their free consent. In the absence of such free consent, there can be no question of any goodwill bonus. 14. Before we part with these appeals, however, we must briefly advert to the general considerations which have been pressed b... | 1[ds]There is no doubt therefore that it is open to an industrial court in an appropriate case to impose new obligations on the parties before it or modify contracts in the interest of industrial peace or give awards which may have the effect of extending existing agreement or making a new one. This, however, does not ... | 1 | 6,766 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
so-called goodwill bonus, for that bonus depends upon the goodwill of the parties and on their free consent. In the absence of such free consent... |
39 | Dewaji Vs. Ganpatlal | 1951-52.8. The appeal was then heard by Badkas, J. It was argued before him that Vyas, J., should not have referred the issue to the Revenue Officer for decision under Section 16 of the 1951 Act, but Badkas, J., held that it would not be appropriate or him to sit in judgment over the decision given by Vyas, J., and tha... | 0[ds]9. Having obtained leave, the respondent appealed under the Letters Patent. It was urged before the Letters Patent Bench on behalf of the appellant that the Bench could not deal with the question whether the 1953 Act applied to pending proceedings on the ground that this point had not been argued before the learne... | 0 | 2,490 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the arguments and evidence in the case and predict the verdict: is an acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appeal more probable?
### Input:
1951-52.8. The appeal was then heard by Badkas, J. It was argued before him that Vyas, J., should not have referred the issue to the Revenue Officer fo... |
40 | N. S. Shethna Vs. Vinubhai Harilal Panchal | being one year only. In the first place we do not see how such a consequence must follow. The procedure for an action under R. 131 is not an elaborate one which would make an inquiry thereunder a prolonged one. In the second place, unless the Rules are found to be ambiguous we do not see how a particular consequence ca... | 0[ds]The Rules relating to the licence for sale of tickets provide as aforesaid that the maximum period for which such a licence can be issued is one year. Renewal of a licence is provided for but only indirectly and in a sort of an off-hand manner by cl. 4 of Form F. It appears therefrom that a licensee has to produce... | 0 | 2,929 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case proceedings and provide a prediction: is the court likely to rule in favor of (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner?
### Input:
being one year only. In the first place we do not see how such a consequence must follow. The procedure for an action under R. 131 is not an elaborate o... |
41 | The Greater Bombay Co-operative Bank Limited Vs. Nagraj Ganeshmal Jain & Others | of the counsel for the respondent No.1.11. The forensic expert sent his report dated 21.07.2010 in which he found that the signature on the photocopy did not appear to be of Shri Dhillon P. Shah. On 09.10.2010, the objection petition filed by the respondent No.1 was dismissed and it was held that he had no right title ... | 1[ds]14. Here, it would be pertinent to mention that admittedly the respondent No.1 was a close friend of Shri Dhillon P.Shah and he also states that he had a lot of business dealings with him. According to the respondent No.1 an amount of Rs. 20 lakhs were advanced by M/s. Hitesh Corporation a proprietary firm of the ... | 1 | 1,971 | ### Instruction:
Delve into the case proceeding and predict the outcome: is the judgment expected to be in support (1) or in denial (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
of the counsel for the respondent No.1.11. The forensic expert sent his report dated 21.07.2010 in which he found that the signature on the photocopy did not... |
42 | A.B. Bhaskara Rao Vs. Inspector of Police, CBI Visakhapatnam | parties in any cause or matter pending before it. The very nature of the power must lead the court to set limits for itself within which to exercise those powers and ordinarily it cannot disregard a statutory provision governing a subject, except perhaps to balance the equities between the conflicting claims of the lit... | 1[ds]It is clear that the Bench itself has clarified that they are not laying down the law that in spite of issuing notice confining to a particular aspect (in the case on hand -) the parties are entitled to urge all points and re-open the case as if they are free to do the same without any restriction. As a matter of ... | 1 | 6,946 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
parties in any cause or matter pending before it. The very nature of the power must lead the court to set limits for itself within which to exercise those powers and ordinarily it canno... |
43 | Manjit Singh Sodhi Vs. The Custodian & Ors | not expressly excluded by the special Law. The three-Judge Bench in L S Synthetics Ltd (supra) observed that Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act is not applicable to the Act of 1992 since in terms of the provisions of the Act, no period of limitation is prescribed. 16. In Fairgrowth Investments Ltd (supra), the issue b... | 1[ds]12. A Constitution bench of this Court in Mohan Lal Magan Lal Thacker v. State of Gujarat AIR 1968 SC 733 differentiated between a final order and interlocutory order as follows:4. The question as to whether a judgment or an order is final or not has been the subject-matter of a number of decisions; yet no single... | 1 | 4,138 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
not expressly excluded by the special Law. The three-Judge Bench in L S Synthetics Ltd (supra) observed that Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act is not applicable to the Act of 1992 sin... |
44 | K.K. Saksena Vs. International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage | measure to play. The activities undertaken by the respondent-society, a nongovernmental organization, do not actually partake the nature of public duty or state actions. There is absence of public element as has been stated in V.R. Rudani and others (supra) and Sri Venkateswara Hindu College of Engineering and another ... | 0[ds]In the present case, since ICID is not funded by the Government nor it is discharging any function under any statute, the only question is as to whether it is discharging public duty or positive obligation of public nature. It is clear from the reading of the impugned judgment, the High Court was fully conscious o... | 0 | 10,621 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
measure to play. The activities undertaken by the respondent-society, a nongovernmental organization, do not actually partake the nature of publ... |
45 | The Punjabi University & Others Vs. Acharya Swami Ganesh & Another | provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. The acquired lands were valued by the Land Acquisition Officer at Rs. 76, 029.15 P. At the instance of the respondent the matter was referred to the District Judge under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The learned District Judge enhanced the compensation payable to Rs. 2,... | 1[ds]It may be noted that the party which was essentially interested in filing the appeal was the Punjabi University. It had to pay the compensation for the lands acquired. Therefore, there was nothing surprising if the Government had left the matters in the hands of the Punjabi University. The Punjab Government was on... | 1 | 1,164 | ### Instruction:
Scrutinize the evidence and arguments in the case proceeding to predict the court's decision: will the appeal be granted (1) or denied (0)?
### Input:
provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. The acquired lands were valued by the Land Acquisition Officer at Rs. 76, 029.15 P. At the instance of the resp... |
46 | Shaik Madar Saheb And Ors. Etc Vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors | not give a completely accurate picture which is relevant to the present discussion. 17. The High Court concluded that the petitioners had not been able to give any statistical data or adduce any sound reasons to persuade it to reject the data furnished by the budgetary estimate and the analysis thereof given on behalf ... | 0[ds]The facts and figures disclosed do not justify us in coming to the conclusion that the levy was a general one for augmenting the revenues of the State. On the other hand the figures disclosed show that the total receipts from the tax even now fall short of the expenditure on roads and allied purposes. We are also ... | 0 | 4,485 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
not give a completely accurate picture which is relevant to the present discussion. 17. The High Court concluded that the petitioners had not been able to give any ... |
47 | Daulatrao Jairamji (Since Dead) L.Rs Vs. Harishchandra & Others | as regards the execution of the deed is extremely artificial. It may be noted that at about the time, the plaintiff executed the adoption deed, he had also executed gift deeds in favour of his two wives, his mistress and his daughter. He himself presented all those documents for registration. Apart from averring in the... | 1[ds]e was a controversy between the parties as to whether the plaintiff and his brother Champatrao, defendant No. 1 were members of an undivided family or whether they weredivided. Both the trial court as well as the High Court came to the conclusion that there was partition between the plaintiff and his brother in th... | 1 | 2,454 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case proceedings and provide a prediction: is the court likely to rule in favor of (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner?
### Input:
as regards the execution of the deed is extremely artificial. It may be noted that at about the time, the plaintiff executed the adoption deed, he had a... |
48 | Shew Bux Mohato & Ors Vs. Ajit Nath Dutta | plaintiffs.4. On July 30, 1901 one Upendra Nath Addey obtained from Sukheswari a Mourashi Mokrari lease of 6 bighas out of the aforesaid 31 bighas of garden land on payment of Rs. 1,300 by way of salami or premium. The leased property is comprised in C. S. Dags Nos. 144-150. The lease was executed by Sukheswari in purs... | 0[ds]Clause 5 directed the executrix to pay the testators debts. Clause 3 directed her to pay maintenance to the mother and stepmother of the testator. The testator could not have intended to impose any restriction on the power of the executrix to dispose of the estate for the payment of the debts and the maintenance. ... | 0 | 1,367 | ### Instruction:
Based on the legal narrative and evidentiary details in the case proceeding, predict the court's stance: favorable (1) or unfavorable (0) to the appellant.
### Input:
plaintiffs.4. On July 30, 1901 one Upendra Nath Addey obtained from Sukheswari a Mourashi Mokrari lease of 6 bighas out of the aforesai... |
49 | Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax, Kerala Vs. Kailas Rubber and Company Limited | SATYANARAYANA RAJU J.1. This is an appeal, by special leave, against the order of the High Court of Kerala dated August 2, 1963, in Income-tax Reference Case No. 48/62 (Agricultural) The facts leading to this appeal may be briefly stated. The respondent is a company which owned a rubber estate purchased by it along wit... | 0[ds]6. The definition of " agricultural income " in section 2 does not include proceeds from the sale of rubber trees in an estate which were utilised for the purpose of deriving income in the shape of latex. There was enough evidence in the record justifying the High Courts conclusion that the rubber trees formed par... | 0 | 837 | ### Instruction:
Examine the case narrative and anticipate the court's decision: will it result in an approval (1) or disapproval (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
SATYANARAYANA RAJU J.1. This is an appeal, by special leave, against the order of the High Court of Kerala dated August 2, 1963, in Income-tax Reference Case N... |
50 | Ram Dahin Singh and Others Vs. State of Bihar | cartridges found there. According to the evidence of Bande Hasan (D.W. 1), for Ram Dahin Singh it was 10 to 15 days after the 4th of November, 1963, that Ram Dahin Singh went to him, Bande Hasan, it may be pointed out, is stated to be the counsel in the case in which Ram Dahin Singh is said to have appeared as a witnes... | 0[ds]6. In so far as the right of private defence is concerned in face of the concurrent findings of the two courts below that the actual possession of the land was with Ghurfekan and others and that there is no reliable evidence in regard to actual possession by the purchasers from Tarkeshwar Estate, this plea is diff... | 0 | 5,550 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
cartridges found there. According to the evidence of Bande Hasan (D.W. 1), for Ram Dahin Singh it was 10 to 15 days after the 4th of November, 1... |
51 | PREM SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SECRETARY | he was appointed in the year 1978 on a fixed monthly salary of Rs.205 per month. They were allowed to cross efficiency bar also as the benefit of pay scale was granted to them during the period they served as work-charged employees they served for three to four decades and later on services have been regularized time t... | 1[ds]18. In Punjab State Electricity Board v. Narata Singh (2010) 4 SCC 317 , this Court once again considered the similar question of determination of qualifying service for grant of pensionary benefits, in particular, the benefit of the previous service in work-charged capacity with the State Government and whether ... | 1 | 10,892 | ### Instruction:
Delve into the case proceeding and predict the outcome: is the judgment expected to be in support (1) or in denial (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
he was appointed in the year 1978 on a fixed monthly salary of Rs.205 per month. They were allowed to cross efficiency bar also as the benefit of pay scale w... |
52 | Union of India Vs. District Judge, Udhampur | so as to include a body, local authority, or a company for whose benefit the land is acquired and who is bound under an agreement to pay the compensation. In our opinion, this view accords with the principles of equity, justice and good conscience. How can it be said that a person for whose benefit the land is acquired... | 1[ds]4. In this case, the compensation was fixed with the association of the local officers of the appellant. The contention that the appellants have no locus standi is equally no longer res integra. In addition he also contends that for the second limb of Rule 9(1) i.e. the approval of the Govt. in the administrative ... | 1 | 4,387 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
so as to include a body, local authority, or a company for whose benefit the land is acquired and who is bound under an agreement to pay the compensation. In our opinion, this view acco... |
53 | Income Tax Officer, Special Investigation Circle 'A', Nagpur Vs. J. B. Mangharam and Company and Others | of the concern4. Within two years from the date of the Government order, the respondents would install and work an up-to-date biscuit factory in Gwalior of a capacity of 8 tons and a confectionary factory of 5 tons per day of 8 hours and invest a total capital on machinery and buildings of approximately Rs. 15 lakhs5. ... | 1[ds]4. This appeal has been heard along with the appeals of Union of Indio v. Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co. Ltd., judgment in which has just been delivered. We have in that case considered the scope and effect of the provision contained in article 295(1)(b) of the Constitution and have held that in view of the po... | 1 | 1,387 | ### Instruction:
From the information provided in the case proceeding, infer whether the court's decision will be positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant.
### Input:
of the concern4. Within two years from the date of the Government order, the respondents would install and work an up-to-date biscuit factory in G... |
54 | COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS | I.A. NO. 186810 OF 2019:1. The applicant, M/s Sarda Mines Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, ?SMPL?), holds a mining lease for Thakurani (Block B) iron-ore mines at Keonjhar, Odisha. Since, 31.03.2014, its mining operations are lying closed, and it has accordingly approached this Court seeking appropriate directions for resumptio... | 1[ds]10. Mideast also undertakes to apply the sale proceeds of its stacked iron ore towards the demand raised against it by the State in order to simultaneously augment the State?s revenue as well as reduce the applicant?s liabilities11. Learned counsel for the State of Odisha conveyed no objection to granting the appl... | 1 | 565 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
I.A. NO. 186810 OF 2019:1. The applicant, M/s Sarda Mines Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, ?SMPL?), holds a mining lease for Thakurani (Block B) iron-ore mines at Keonjhar, ... |
55 | MWP Ltd Vs. Commnr. of Income Tax Karnataka (Central) | was produced. Clause 8 of the Agreement which is relevant to the present controversy is being extracted hereunder: "It is hereby agreed by the buyer that in the event of the Government of Andhra Pradesh treating the excise duty paid by the buyer as part of turnover of the seller and demanding sales tax and other charge... | 1[ds]8. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of the rival parties, we do not find that the issues that arise for consideration should detain the Court. Admittedly and evidently no question with regard to the authenticity of the Agreement dated 18.12.1981 was framed so as to require or justify an answer ... | 1 | 1,461 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
was produced. Clause 8 of the Agreement which is relevant to the present controversy is being extracted hereunder: "It is hereby agreed by the buyer that in th... |
56 | HARBANS KAUR Vs. IQBAL SINGH AND ANR | ground under this clause shall he filed unless the landlord has given it notice to the tenant by registered post, acknowledgment due, demanding arrears of rent and the tenant has not made payment of arrears of rent within a period of thirty days from the (late of service of notice.Explanation. For the purposes of this... | 1[ds]15. A comparison of scheme of Section 6 as it existed in Act, 1950 and Section 6 as it brought under Act, 2001 makes it clear that although the tenant under the old Act was entitled to apply for fixation of standard rent if the rent was excessive whereas under Section 6 of the Act, 2001 tenant has not been given a... | 1 | 5,276 | ### Instruction:
Review the case details and predict the decision: will the court accept (1) or deny (0) the appeal/petition?
### Input:
ground under this clause shall he filed unless the landlord has given it notice to the tenant by registered post, acknowledgment due, demanding arrears of rent and the tenant has not... |
57 | M.H. UMA MAHESHWARI & ORS Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. & ANR | copy of the Insurance Policy was marked as exhibit, with consent. 5. The Tribunal, by considering the oral and documentary evidence on record, has recorded a finding that the accident occurred due to negligent driving of the driver of the vehicle and proceeded to quantify the compensation. Having regard to the evidence... | 1[ds]8. The Tribunal, by recording a finding that the deceased was in the age group of 40 to 50 years, applied the multiplier of 13 while calculating the compensation. The High Court, curiously while maintaining the multiplier of 13 as per the judgment of this Court in the case of Sarla Verma (2009) 6 SCC 121, has red... | 1 | 1,455 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
copy of the Insurance Policy was marked as exhibit, with consent. 5. The Tribunal, by considering the oral and documentary evidence on record, has recorded a findin... |
58 | Ramnikal Pitambardas Mehta Vs. Indradaman Amratlal Sheth | from the date the landlord recovers possession or the premises are re-let within a period of one year of the said date of any person other than the original tenant, the Court may order the landlord, on the application of the original tenant, within the time prescribed, to place him in occupation of the premises on the ... | 0[ds]12. We agree with the Curt below that the respondents case falls under cl. (g) when he bona fide requires the premises for his own occupation. The mere fact that he intends to make alterations in the house either on account of his sweet will or on account of absolute necessity in view of the condition of the house... | 0 | 2,924 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
from the date the landlord recovers possession or the premises are re-let within a period of one year of the said date of any person other than the original te... |
59 | Mohammad Shujat, Ali & Ors. Etc Vs. Union Of India & Ors. Etc | I being denied the opportunity for promotion and the graduate Supervior is preferred? There can be no satisfactory answer to this question. It must be remembered that many of these non-graduate Supervisors might not have been able to obtain degree in engineering because they came from poorer families and did not have t... | 0[ds]It is, therefore, not possible to overturn the decision of the Government of Andhra Pradesh denying equivalence of US and OCE certificates of the Osmania Engineering College with LCE, LME or LEE diplomas. It may be noted that the Central Government also affirmed the decision of the Government of Andhra Pradesh by ... | 0 | 17,049 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case proceedings and provide a prediction: is the court likely to rule in favor of (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner?
### Input:
I being denied the opportunity for promotion and the graduate Supervior is preferred? There can be no satisfactory answer to this question. It must be r... |
60 | Hindustan Aeronautics Vs. A. Radhika Thirumalai | to be given in accordance with the relevant rules and guidelines that have been framed by the authority concerned and no person can claim appointment on compassionate grounds in disregard of such rule or such guideline (See : LIC v. Asha Ramchhandra Ambekar) 6. In the appellant-Company appointment on compassionate grou... | 1[ds]8. In the instant case the ban on fresh recruitment was in force when the respondent submitted the application for appointment on compassionate grounds. The decision in Sushma Gosain has, therefore, no application in the facts of thisAs regards the submission of Shri Nageshwara Rao that the respondent could be giv... | 1 | 2,041 | ### Instruction:
Review the case details and predict the decision: will the court accept (1) or deny (0) the appeal/petition?
### Input:
to be given in accordance with the relevant rules and guidelines that have been framed by the authority concerned and no person can claim appointment on compassionate grounds in disr... |
61 | MALLANAGUODA AND ORS Vs. NINGANAGOUDA AND ORS | judgment. He also argued that the High Court reversed the judgment of the First Appellate Court on the basis of facts contrary to the evidence on record. 6. Mr. S.N. Bhat, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents/Defendants argued that the High Court has righty held that the land in Block No.5 has non-agricultural... | 1[ds]Schedule A has seven properties, totaling 69 acres, 16 guntas. Plaintiff was allotted 8 acres, 27 guntas being 1/8th share of 69 acres, 16 guntas. The partition documents prepared by the Commissioner appointed by the Court shows that the Plaintiff was given 8 acres, 13 guntas in Block No.5. As the Plaintiff was en... | 1 | 1,642 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
judgment. He also argued that the High Court reversed the judgment of the First Appellate Court on the basis of facts contrary to the evidence on record. 6. Mr... |
62 | Ramprakash Gupta Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others | been allowed by the Minister on 26.8.2003, but the authorities have overlooked the said order and passed another order on 17.1.2005 dismissing the revision of the appellant. It was the submission of the appellant that the act of overlooking the order dated 26.8.2003 and passing a fresh order, amounts to a review not pe... | 0[ds]We have perused a photocopy of the record which has been annexed to the present proceedings. The so called order dated 26.08.2003 does not contain any reference to the case number. That apart, the order sheet contains several interpolations. Initially the matter was marked to the Minister but since the record was ... | 0 | 1,444 | ### Instruction:
Scrutinize the evidence and arguments in the case proceeding to predict the court's decision: will the appeal be granted (1) or denied (0)?
### Input:
been allowed by the Minister on 26.8.2003, but the authorities have overlooked the said order and passed another order on 17.1.2005 dismissing the revi... |
63 | Rameshwar & Others Vs. State of Haryana & Others | Enviro-Legal Action (Supra) unjust retention of benefit would be completely against the fundamental principles of justice, equity and good conscience. It was observed therein that so long as the deprivation of a party has not been fully compensated for, injustice to that extent continues. Having found that there was a ... | 1[ds]If we consider the established or crystallized facets of the matter as stated above, in the light of the principles emerging from the decisions rendered by this Court, in our considered view the decisions dated 24.08.2007 and 29.01.2010 were taken to confer advantages and benefits upon the builders/private entitie... | 1 | 24,182 | ### Instruction:
Based on the legal narrative and evidentiary details in the case proceeding, predict the court's stance: favorable (1) or unfavorable (0) to the appellant.
### Input:
Enviro-Legal Action (Supra) unjust retention of benefit would be completely against the fundamental principles of justice, equity and g... |
64 | Ranendra Chandra Banerjee Vs. Union Of India | (other than a person so employed only occasionally or subject to discharge at less than one months notice) except-(a) persons for whose appointment and conditions of employment special provision is made by or under any law for the time being in force ;(b) x x x x x x x x x x x x x x"7. Rule 3(a) thus excludes the appli... | 0[ds]We agree with the High Court that though the letter of appointment did not say in so many words that the probation was likely to be extended, it was implicit therein that the probation would continue till such time as the appellant was confirmed or discharged and so would the-term in the appointment letter that hi... | 0 | 2,833 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the arguments and evidence in the case and predict the verdict: is an acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appeal more probable?
### Input:
(other than a person so employed only occasionally or subject to discharge at less than one months notice) except-(a) persons for whose appointment and... |
65 | French Motor Car Co., Limited Vs. Workmen | because some recommendation, which is still to be implemented, has been made by a Committee, that the contribution should be increased to eight per centum in the case of the appellant company only, when the general rate is only 6 1/4 per centum. In the circumstances, this part of the award must be set aside and the rat... | 1[ds]It is now well settled that the principle of industry-cum- region has to be applied by an industrial court, when it proceeds to consider questions like wage structure, dearness allowance and similar conditions of service. In applying that principle industrial courts have to compare wage scales Prevailing in simila... | 1 | 4,067 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
because some recommendation, which is still to be implemented, has been made by a Committee, that the contribution should be increased to eight ... |
66 | Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Vimla Devi | Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Challenge in these appeals are to the order passed by a Division Bench of the Uttaranchal High Court. Three appeals filed by the appellant against the common judgment and award dated 10th October, 2003 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District Judge, Tehri Garhwal (i... | 1[ds]It was the stand of learned Counsel for the appellant that both the MACT and the High Court erroneously held that the premiums were paid for the goods as well as for the passengers. In fact no premium was paid for passengers as admittedly the vehicle was a goods commercial vehicle. The appeal survives in respect o... | 1 | 551 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Challenge in these appeals are to the order passed by a Division Bench of the Uttaranchal High Court... |
67 | HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | to the root of the trial, though permissible in law, is justified. 20. A three-Judge Bench of this Court in Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours Private Limited (2012) 5 SCC 661 considered the question of conviction of the Directors in the absence of the Company in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable In... | 1[ds]13. We do not find any merit in the arguments raised by Dr. Singhvi with respect to the punishment provided under the 2006 Act. The judgment of this Court in T. Barai is consequent to amendment in the Act when Section 16A was inserted by the Parliament. Similarly, the judgment in Nemi Chand was a judgment arising ... | 1 | 5,598 | ### Instruction:
From the information provided in the case proceeding, infer whether the court's decision will be positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant.
### Input:
to the root of the trial, though permissible in law, is justified. 20. A three-Judge Bench of this Court in Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tou... |
68 | Shyam Behari Lal Vs. Lalla Jageshwar Prasad | that the decree passed by the Judge, Small Cause Court in Suit No. 1138 of 1952 did not operate as res judicata in the present suit. On the merits of the case the Trial Court found that the respondent had failed to prove that the appellant had taken the accommodation on monthly rent of Rs. 40/- and so the appellant was... | 0[ds]There is, however, no material on the record of the case to show as to what was the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Judge, Court of Small Causes, Kanpur, on the relevant date. In the absence of the relevant information included on this point we are unable to accede to the argument of the appellant that the Judge, Sm... | 0 | 1,740 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
that the decree passed by the Judge, Small Cause Court in Suit No. 1138 of 1952 did not operate as res judicata in the present suit. On the merits of the case the T... |
69 | Coal India Ltd Vs. Bibbu Ranjan Kumar | (for short `DGMS) with 40% and above marks be sent. The respondent claiming to be an eligible candidate wanted his name to be recommended and his bio-data to be sent to the centralized cell of the appellant-company for the purpose. The appellant did not accept the respondent as a candidate possessing the prescribed eli... | 1[ds]11. On a fair reading of the provisions of the Rule quoted above it is clear to us that clauses (a), (b) and (c) of(2) of rule 72 are to be read in conjunction with each other and a person in order to be eligible to hold the post of Welfare Officer must fulfil these conditions except the practical experience of ha... | 1 | 1,377 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
(for short `DGMS) with 40% and above marks be sent. The respondent claiming to be an eligible candidate wanted his name to be recommended and his bio-data to be sen... |
70 | Narasamma and Ors Vs. A. Krishnappa | that his wife, Smt. Narasamma, possessed title was not established on the basis of the documents sought to be propounded. It is also relevant that none of the parties chose to implead her as a party. Once the case of the original Defendant was that it is Smt. Narasamma who had derived title, and alternative plea was of... | 0[ds]24. It is relevant to note that on the crucial issue of the factual matrix regarding the documents and the conclusion to be drawn from them, both the Courts are ad idem. Not only grave doubt has been thrown on the story of the Appellants herein, but both Courts also record that the documents sought to be propounde... | 0 | 5,725 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
that his wife, Smt. Narasamma, possessed title was not established on the basis of the documents sought to be propounded. It is also relevant that none of the ... |
71 | Vishal N Kalsaria Vs. Bank Of India | Code of civil Procedure. The Securitisation Act drastically changed the scenario inasmuch as it enabled banks, financial institutions and other secured creditors to recover their dues without intervention of the Courts or Tribunals. The Securitisation Act also made provision for registration and regulation of securitis... | 1[ds]30. It is a settled position of law that once tenancy is created, a tenant can be evicted only after following the due process of law, as prescribed under the provisions of the Rent Control Act. A tenant cannot be arbitrarily evicted by using the provisions of the SARFAESI Act as that would amount to stultifying t... | 1 | 9,567 | ### Instruction:
Review the case details and predict the decision: will the court accept (1) or deny (0) the appeal/petition?
### Input:
Code of civil Procedure. The Securitisation Act drastically changed the scenario inasmuch as it enabled banks, financial institutions and other secured creditors to recover their due... |
72 | Dr. Indramani Pyarelal Gupta Vs. W. R. Nathu And Others | was not comprehended by the phrase "under the Act", it would be illogical to hold that it would take in a bye-law. If would mean that the Legislature specially provided for a rule, which has certainly a higher status than bye-law in legislative practice, while it treated a bye-law as a provision of Act, that cannot be.... | 0[ds]In our opinion, these decisions afford no assistance for resolving the controversy before us. There is no question here of deducing an implied power from the grant of an express one. What we are concerned with is the scope of the grant of an express power or rather whether the grant of the power conferred upon the... | 0 | 17,598 | ### Instruction:
From the information provided in the case proceeding, infer whether the court's decision will be positive (1) or negative (0) for the appellant.
### Input:
was not comprehended by the phrase "under the Act", it would be illogical to hold that it would take in a bye-law. If would mean that the Legislat... |
73 | Andhra Steel Corporation Ltd. Etc Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Electricityboard And Ors | them from payment of sales tax. What consequently follows is that the exemption granted by the government was only by way of concession. Once this position emerges it goes without saying that a concession can be withdrawn at any time and no time limit can be insisted upon before the concession is withdrawn. The notific... | 0[ds]9. Having considered the respective submissions of learned counsel for the parties on this point we are of the opinion that on the facts of the instant appeals it is not necessary to go into the rival contentions referred to above on this point. Here, the Electricity Board as is apparent from its proceedings dated... | 0 | 4,220 | ### Instruction:
Considering the arguments and evidence in case proceeding, predict the verdict: is it more likely to be in favor (1) or against (0) the appellant?
### Input:
them from payment of sales tax. What consequently follows is that the exemption granted by the government was only by way of concession. Once th... |
74 | Hasmukh S/O Bhagwanji M. Patel Vs. The State Of Gujarat & Ors | facts and circumstances of the particular case. In the circumstances of a given case, if the time taken for supply of such additional particulars, exceeds marginally, the maximum fixed by the statute for communication of the grounds it may still be regarded "reasonable", while in the facts of another case, even a delay... | 0[ds]15. Contentions 3 and 4 canvassed by Shri Sorabjee need not detain usShri Nain has produced for the perusal of the Court the original official record from which it is clear that the detention order was passed by the Home Minister. It was authenticated and issued under the Rules of Business by Shri P. M. Shah, depu... | 0 | 4,667 | ### Instruction:
Review the case details and predict the decision: will the court accept (1) or deny (0) the appeal/petition?
### Input:
facts and circumstances of the particular case. In the circumstances of a given case, if the time taken for supply of such additional particulars, exceeds marginally, the maximum fix... |
75 | Collector Of Central Excise, Ahmedabad Vs. I.T.E.C. (P) Ltd., Bombay | persons the Tribunal has rightly allowed the appeal. 4. The question as to whether the respondent and M/s. International are related persons has to be determined in the light of the definition of that expression in Section 4(4) (c) of the Excise Act. It reads as follows: "(c). "related person" means a person who is so ... | 1[ds]5. From a plain reading of the definition, it is evident that if a person is so associated with the assessee that both of them have interest directly or indirectly in the business of each other, they would be treated as related persons. The definition also includes a holding company, a subsidiary company, a relati... | 1 | 1,575 | ### Instruction:
Review the case details and predict the decision: will the court accept (1) or deny (0) the appeal/petition?
### Input:
persons the Tribunal has rightly allowed the appeal. 4. The question as to whether the respondent and M/s. International are related persons has to be determined in the light of the ... |
76 | M/S. Maharashtra State Seeds Corpn. Ltd Vs. Haridas | would arise only when the delinquent officer is exonerated either wholly or in part of the charges levelled against him whereas the disciplinary authority forms a different opinion. Most of the charges have been found proved and the Disciplinary Authority to that extent did not differ with the report of the Enquiry Off... | 1[ds]12. It has not been shown to us, despite repeated query made in this behalf as to whether under the statutory rules, the Enquiry Officer was empowered to make any recommendation to the Disciplinary Authority as regard quantum of punishment to be imposed upon a delinquent employee. The High Court has noticed that t... | 1 | 3,352 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
would arise only when the delinquent officer is exonerated either wholly or in part of the charges levelled against him whereas the disciplinary authority forms a different opinion. Mos... |
77 | Tata Press Limited Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited And | drug may be of much more importance to general public than to the advertiser who may be having purely a trade consideration.25. We, therefore, hold that "commercial speech" is a part of freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.26. Adverting to the question whether Tatas com... | 1[ds]13. It is, thus, obvious that the United States Supreme Court in Virginia Board case has virtually overruled Valentines case decide in 1942. The Court has ruled in clear terms that the Virginia statute which had the effect of prohibiting pharmacies from advertising the price of prescription drugs violated the Firs... | 1 | 8,710 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
drug may be of much more importance to general public than to the advertiser who may be having purely a trade consideration.25. We, therefore, h... |
78 | American Hotel & Lodging Assn. Educational Institute Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes & Others | grant approvals on such terms and conditions a it deems fit in case where the Institute applies for initial approval for the first time. The PA must give an opportunity to the applicant-institute to comply with the monitoring conditions which have been stipulated for the first time by the third proviso. Therefore, case... | 0[ds]27. Actual existence of the educational institution was the pre-condition of the application for initial approval under Section 10(22). On grant of approval under Section 10(22), Sections 11 and 13 did not apply. Therefore, earlier prior to 1.4.1999 when exemption was given to the appellant, there was no assessmen... | 0 | 10,169 | ### Instruction:
Scrutinize the evidence and arguments in the case proceeding to predict the court's decision: will the appeal be granted (1) or denied (0)?
### Input:
grant approvals on such terms and conditions a it deems fit in case where the Institute applies for initial approval for the first time. The PA must gi... |
79 | Divisonal Manager, Rajasthan S.R.T.C Vs. Kamruddin | committed similar misconduct for the fifth time. It is also beyond any doubt or dispute that he had also been served with a letter of warning.10. The power of Labour Court and/or Industrial Tribunal in terms of Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to interfere with the quantum of punishment although cannot ... | 1[ds]9. It is not a case where the misconduct against the respondent had not been proved. It is also not a case where the domestic enquiry was found to have been conducted in an unfair manner or contrary to the principles of natural justice. The services of the respondent had been terminated while the period of probati... | 1 | 2,965 | ### Instruction:
Based on the legal narrative and evidentiary details in the case proceeding, predict the court's stance: favorable (1) or unfavorable (0) to the appellant.
### Input:
committed similar misconduct for the fifth time. It is also beyond any doubt or dispute that he had also been served with a letter of w... |
80 | Jeevantha & Others Vs. Hanumantha & Others | by the father of the present plaintiffs against the present appellants for a declaration of his title in respect of three survey numbers, 36, 38 and 54, which were assessed at Rs. 84.00 land revenue. It was also prayed that a sale deed that had been executed in respect of this property by defendants 1 and 3 in favour o... | 1[ds](4) It is unnecessary to go into the merits of the case because we think that the defendants have made out their plea of the res judicata and the decisions of the Court below on this issue are erroneous. It is true that in order to make out a plea of res judicata it is necessary to prove that the Court that tried ... | 1 | 1,118 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
by the father of the present plaintiffs against the present appellants for a declaration of his title in respect of three survey numbers, 36, 38 and 54, which were ... |
81 | Liyakat Vs. State Of Uttaranchal | observed thus: (SCC pp. 206-07, para 21) "21. In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the settled law is that the circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is drawn should be fully proved and such circumstances must be conclusive in nature. Moreover, all the circumstances should be complete and there should ... | 0[ds]13. Before analysing the factual aspects it may be stated that for a crime to be proved it is not necessary that the crime must be seen to have been committed and must, in all circumstances be proved by direct ocular evidence by examining before the court those persons who had seen its commission. The offence can ... | 0 | 2,797 | ### Instruction:
Using the case data, forecast whether the court is likely to side with (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner.
### Input:
observed thus: (SCC pp. 206-07, para 21) "21. In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the settled law is that the circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is drawn... |
82 | Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan Vs. Municipal Board of Sitapur & Another | there is a disclaimer or renunciation in clear and unequivocal terms whether the same be in a pleading or in other documents. no forfeiture is incurred.19. Ex. A-18 was the only document containing the statement of the appellant which was held by the High Court to amount to a disclaimer entailing a forfeiture. Learned ... | 1[ds]Before we proceed to state the points urged before us, it is necessary to mention that the arguments before us have proceeded on the assumption that the appellant was a permanent lessee with heritable and transferable rights. We are saying this because the learned Judges of the High Court have not recorded any def... | 1 | 7,481 | ### Instruction:
Examine the details of the case proceeding and forecast if the appeal/petition stands a chance of being upheld (1) or dismissed (0).
### Input:
there is a disclaimer or renunciation in clear and unequivocal terms whether the same be in a pleading or in other documents. no forfeiture is incurred.19. Ex... |
83 | Om Prakash & Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others | were having abadi on the date on which Section 4 notification was issued on 5-1-1991 and it was that abadi which had continued without any additional construction thereon till the date of Section 6 notification and thereafter and such abadi was squarely covered by the State policy of not acquiring lands having abadi, t... | 0[ds]12. So far as the question of dispensing with inquiry under Section 5-A is concerned, the scheme of the Land Acquisition Act has to be kept in view. Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Act lays down that whenever it appears to the appropriate Government that land in a locality is needed or is likely to be needed f... | 0 | 16,646 | ### Instruction:
Delve into the case proceeding and predict the outcome: is the judgment expected to be in support (1) or in denial (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
were having abadi on the date on which Section 4 notification was issued on 5-1-1991 and it was that abadi which had continued without any additional constru... |
84 | State of Rajasthan & Another Vs. Fateh Chand & Another | the Commission is available.5. Rule 12 thus lays down the minimum academic qualifications required for eligibility to apply for the post of a Lower Division Clerk, while the rules as to passing the examination held under Rule 7, as to nationality, age and physical fitness etc., are other qualifications required for the... | 1[ds]6. In pursuance of the power under Rule 7, the Government issued the order dated March 5, 1964 regarding the examination for the Lower Division Clerks appointed on a temporary basis. This became necessary as otherwise there would be temporary clerks appointed before 1957 and those appointed thereafter, the former ... | 1 | 2,413 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
the Commission is available.5. Rule 12 thus lays down the minimum academic qualifications required for eligibility to apply for the post of a Lower Division Clerk, while the rules as to... |
85 | The State of Punjab Vs. Bhagat Ram | Ray, C.J.1. This appeal by certificate turns on the question as to whether the State gave the respondent a reasonable opportunity as contemplated by Article 311 of the constitution.2. The respondent was a Sub-Divisional Officer. The State ordered a departmental enquiry against the respondent.3. The respondent filed a s... | 0[ds]7. The meaning of a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the action proposed to be taken is that the Government servant is afforded a reasonable opportunity to defend himself against charges on which inquiry is held. The Government servant should be given an opportunity to deny his guilt and establish h... | 0 | 441 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
Ray, C.J.1. This appeal by certificate turns on the question as to whether the State gave the respondent a reasonable opportunity as contemplated by Article 311 of ... |
86 | M/S. S.J.S. Business Enterprises(P)Ltd Vs. State Of Bihar | If they do their action can be called into question under Article 226. Reasonableness is to be tested against the dominant consideration to secure the best price for the property to be sold. "This can only be achieved when there is a maximum participation in the process of sale and everybody has an opportunity of makin... | 1[ds]15. In this case, admittedly the appellant has withdrawn the suit two weeks after the suit had been filed. In other words the appellant elected to pursue its remedies only under Article 226. The pleadings were also complete before the High Court. No. doubt, the interim order which was passed by the High Court was ... | 1 | 3,923 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the arguments and evidence in the case and predict the verdict: is an acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appeal more probable?
### Input:
If they do their action can be called into question under Article 226. Reasonableness is to be tested against the dominant consideration to secure the ... |
87 | State Of Punjab Vs. Hiralal & Ors | and reservation of posts means reservation of initial posts which may be adopted in order to expedite and make more effective the reservation of appointments themselves. On this construction the use of the word "posts" appears to be wholly redundant. In our opinion, having regard to the fact that we are constructing th... | 1[ds]10. The extent of reservation to be made is primarily a matter for the State to decide. By this we do not mean to say that the decision of the State is not open to judicial review. The reservation must be only for the purpose of giving adequate representation in the services to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Trib... | 1 | 2,698 | ### Instruction:
Scrutinize the evidence and arguments in the case proceeding to predict the court's decision: will the appeal be granted (1) or denied (0)?
### Input:
and reservation of posts means reservation of initial posts which may be adopted in order to expedite and make more effective the reservation of appoin... |
88 | The Naihati Municipality And Ors Vs. Chinmoyee Mukherjee And Ors | K. Ramaswamy, J. 1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dated July 26, 1979 made in C. R. No 2030 (W) of 1978. The admitted facts are that a resolution was passed by the appellant-municipality for rehabilitation of the hawkers by acquiring the land in q... | 1[ds]We are of the view that High Court was not right in its approach in dealing with the matter. The rehabilitation of the hawkers by acquiring the land is indisputadly the public purpose; otherwise it would be a perpetual nuisance to the residents of the municipal area if hawkers were permitted to hawk the goods on p... | 1 | 819 | ### Instruction:
Considering the arguments and evidence in case proceeding, predict the verdict: is it more likely to be in favor (1) or against (0) the appellant?
### Input:
K. Ramaswamy, J. 1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dated July 26, 1979 m... |
89 | Commissioner of Sales Tax, Cuttack, Orissa Vs. Brijraj Rameshwar | registration certificate was granted; and whether proceedings for assessment for the quarter ending on 30th June, 1951, which commenced on 23rd November, 1953, should have been instituted under section 12(2) or section 12(4) and not under section 12(5) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947?4. Whether in the facts and circu... | 0[ds]It is not necessary to decide the question whether the said application, dated August 22, 1949, was a valid application or not, because even if we assume that the application was invalid under section 9(2) of the Act, we are satisfied that section 12(5) of the Act did not apply to the facts and circumstances of th... | 0 | 1,975 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case proceedings and provide a prediction: is the court likely to rule in favor of (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner?
### Input:
registration certificate was granted; and whether proceedings for assessment for the quarter ending on 30th June, 1951, which commenced on 23rd November... |
90 | SIDDARAJU Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA | the reservation policy for the disabled and to protect their rights. 7. We may mention that, pursuant to this Court?s judgment, the Union of India issued Office Memorandum dated 03.12.2013 in which it made only one change in the Office Memorandum dated 29.12.2015 as follows:-"5. Keeping in view the directions of the Ho... | 0[ds]Contempt petitions were filed stating that the directions contained in this judgment have not been carried out, which is not the subject-matter before us. These petitions have been ordered to be listed after the decision in thesejudgment in National Federation of the Blind vs. Sanjay Kothari, Secy. Deptt. of Perso... | 0 | 3,290 | ### Instruction:
Based on the legal narrative and evidentiary details in the case proceeding, predict the court's stance: favorable (1) or unfavorable (0) to the appellant.
### Input:
the reservation policy for the disabled and to protect their rights. 7. We may mention that, pursuant to this Court?s judgment, the Uni... |
91 | State Of U.P. Vs. United Bank Of India | expectation is not valid at all in the eye of law. Moreover, this Court in number of decisions has held clearly that doctrine of legitimate expectation cannot be invoked by someone who has no dealing or transaction or negotiations with an authority or by someone who has a recognized legal relationship with the authorit... | 1[ds]21. It is pertinent to mention here that the land in dispute being a Government property, the appellant-Bank cannot get any right over it. Moreover, neither the appellant-Bank is a lessee of the land in question nor any lease has ever been sanctioned by the Govt, of U.P. in its favour. Hence, the appellant is not ... | 1 | 9,078 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the arguments and evidence in the case and predict the verdict: is an acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appeal more probable?
### Input:
expectation is not valid at all in the eye of law. Moreover, this Court in number of decisions has held clearly that doctrine of legitimate expectation... |
92 | PRAVEEN KUMAR C.P Vs. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION COMMISSION & ORS | after the employment notifications were issued. But what we have to address in these appeals is as to whether the respective B.Ed. degrees of the appellants declared as equivalent to those of the concerned subjects as notified would operate from the dates of issue of the respective GOs or the same would relate back to ... | 1[ds]These decisions are mainly authorities on the point that the Rules prevailing on the date of issue of employment notifications ought to prevail under normal circumstances and new Rules or amendments coming midway through a selection process cannot be applied to that process. Such new Rules would operate prospectiv... | 1 | 6,747 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
after the employment notifications were issued. But what we have to address in these appeals is as to whether the respective B.Ed. degrees of the appellants de... |
93 | Rajindra Kumar Vs. Shri Chandra Narain Singh and Others | born to Shiv Narain Lodhi of Kankua on 14-3-1943. The father of respondent No. 1, Shiv Narain Singh stated that this entry related to respondent No.1. It has been pointed out on behalf of the appellant that there are certain indications in the original Register Ext. A-7 of entries having been tampered with or fabricate... | 0[ds]Before the High Court four types of evidence were adduced by the parties. The first was the oral evidence the second entries in the Kutumb register maintained by the Gaon Sabha; the third, entries in the school records and the fourth, birth certificate. The High Court did not rightly, place much reliance on the or... | 0 | 2,132 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
born to Shiv Narain Lodhi of Kankua on 14-3-1943. The father of respondent No. 1, Shiv Narain Singh stated that this entry related to respondent... |
94 | Central Excise S. C. Limited and Others Vs. Bowrech Cotton Mills Company Limited and Others | 1. Special leave granted 2. We have heard the learned counsel on either side. This appeal arises against the judgment of the Division bench of the Calcutta High Court dated May 21, 1991 granting interim direction pending the matter arising under Article 226 of the Constitution. The appellant admittedly supplies electri... | 1[ds]The appellant company is one of the creditors and it has to lay its claims and decision is to be rendered by the Board. Theis not obligated in these circumstances to pay the same. It is a matter pending in the High Court. The liability to pay to the appellant was disputed before the High Court. The B.I.F.R.s order... | 1 | 864 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case proceedings and provide a prediction: is the court likely to rule in favor of (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner?
### Input:
1. Special leave granted 2. We have heard the learned counsel on either side. This appeal arises against the judgment of the Division bench of the Calcu... |
95 | Banwari Lal Vs. Tirlok Chand & Others (And Vice Versa) | had served them during their illness and that he was affectionately attached to them so that at the time when the wills were executed there was no. one nearer or dearer to Govind Ram and Smt. Chhoti than Banwari Lal. In this view of the matter, the failure to establish the stated relationship is not decisive of the poi... | 0[ds]To this question also we think the High Court gave the correct answer. In this connection reference may be made to the relevant part of Govind Rams will and the same is extracted below :"Shri Banwarilal is the adopted son and heir of the executant. Smt. Chhoti is the widow of Jagannath Prasad, resident of Pilkhuwa... | 0 | 2,464 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
had served them during their illness and that he was affectionately attached to them so that at the time when the wills were executed there was no. one nearer or dearer to Govind Ram an... |
96 | Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. Etc Vs. State Of Kerala & Ors | 1. These appeals by certificate granted by the High Court of Kerala raise the question whether galvanised iron pipes and tubes are a commercially different commodity from steel tubes mentioned in S.14(iv)(xi) of the Central Sales Tax Act. 2. The appellant is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. It has it... | 1[ds]5. The purpose of galvanising a pipe is merely to make it weather-proof. It remains a steel tube. By being put through the process of galvanising it is made rust-proof. Neither its structure nor function is altered. As a commercial item it is not different from a steel tube. That galvanisation is done on steel tub... | 1 | 849 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
1. These appeals by certificate granted by the High Court of Kerala raise the question whether galvanised iron pipes and tubes are a commerciall... |
97 | Transocean Shipping Agency P.Ltd Vs. Black Sea Shipping | any material including the law of Ukraine to establish that the award was invalid as per Ukrainian law or the procedure was incorrect. 16. Under Section 7 of the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 it is provided as follows :- "7. Conditions for enforcement of foreign award : (1) A foreign award may ... | 0[ds]We do not propose to permit the appellants now to produce/prove the relevant law of Ukraine when they have failed to do so before the High Court, and their contention has been consequently rejected by the High Court. The practice of filing fresh documents or evidence for the first time before this Court when the H... | 0 | 3,614 | ### Instruction:
Examine the case narrative and anticipate the court's decision: will it result in an approval (1) or disapproval (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
any material including the law of Ukraine to establish that the award was invalid as per Ukrainian law or the procedure was incorrect. 16. Under Section 7 of t... |
98 | M/S.Thyssen Stahl union Gmbh Vs. Steel Authority Of India | enforce the foreign award under that Act, But before that right is exercised Foreign Awards Act has been repealed. It cannot, therefore, be said that any right had accrued to the party for him to claim to enforce the foreign award under the Foreign Awards Act. After the repeal of the Foreign Awards Act a foreign award ... | 0[ds]34. Section 85(2)(a) of the new Act is in two limbs : (1) Provisions of the old Act shall apply in relation to arbitral proceedings which commenced before the new Act came into force unless otherwise agreed by the parties and (2) new Act shall apply in relation to arbitral proceedings which commenced on or after t... | 0 | 21,607 | ### Instruction:
Review the case details and predict the decision: will the court accept (1) or deny (0) the appeal/petition?
### Input:
enforce the foreign award under that Act, But before that right is exercised Foreign Awards Act has been repealed. It cannot, therefore, be said that any right had accrued to the par... |
99 | State Of Mysore Vs. K. Manche Gowda | bring out the conflicting views. Under Art. 311(2) of the Constitution, as interpreted by this Court, a Government servant must have a reasonable opportunity not only to prove that he is not guilty of the charges levelled against him, but also to establish that the punishment proposed to be imposed is either not called... | 0[ds]It is not, therefore, sufficient that other considerations on which a higher punishment is proposed are present in the mind of the competent authority or are supported by the record of service of the civil servant concerned. In a case where these factors did not form part of any specific charge and did not otherwi... | 0 | 3,097 | ### Instruction:
Examine the details of the case proceeding and forecast if the appeal/petition stands a chance of being upheld (1) or dismissed (0).
### Input:
bring out the conflicting views. Under Art. 311(2) of the Constitution, as interpreted by this Court, a Government servant must have a reasonable opportunity ... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.