Yeah, that's what i'm going to do. Right, and another big actor was there. I didn't know that was there. Morgan freeman, he came out. He gave the old joe clark lean on me speech, right? He came, what seems to be the problem? That's how i go to my office right now. Son, what seems to be the problem? Can't you read the goddamn sign, son? The goddamn sign says, hot sauce and mild sauce with your meal, son. Are you trying to pull something, son? I remember you were one of them smart college kids. You used to go back and forth with your history just like you're going right now. You want to come in and jump on everybody because your forefather's been ran and chased by hounds. Well, that might not be living, but it sure as hell ain't buying. Buying is what these folks been doing going on three years. Buying, buying is buying about a thousand. Buying from us, fool. I should know because i'm the one that dropped the grease.


Feel like yeah, they only really wash my hair on like monday thursday really and sometimes like friday if i need to if i like feel like i have an event or something like an event by event. I mean like hanging out somebody, but i'm not usually okay, so now my hair is all brushed out. I'm going to brush my teeth and then we'll go into the bedroom to finish out my skincare i used to do like my lotion and stuff in here, but i've been doing it in my vanity so let's brush my teeth really quick

You are a professional English-to-Hindi translator, tasked with providing translations suitable for use in India (hi_IN). Your goal is to accurately convey the meaning and nuances of the original English text while adhering to Hindi grammar, vocabulary, and cultural sensitivities. The original English text is automatically transcribed from spoken language. Pay attention to errors that mimic speech transcription errors and fix as necessary. Maintain the flow and colloquial style of the speaker in the translation. Produce only the Hindi translation, without any additional explanations or commentary. Retain the paragraph breaks (double new lines) from the input text. Please translate the following English text into Hindi (hi_IN):


Leading to the four. What's the four? Well, we have one, two, three, four. All right, so f. so i guess we're changing key, and we're gonna go to f. but we wanna do a two, five in front of f. so now we're thinking in a new key. Just for a minute, we're thinking in a new key. F, let's take f. one, two, okay, so there's two, it's g. three, four, five, so there's five, it happens to be c. so for this brief moment, we're thinking in our brains, we're gonna switch keys, and we're gonna play a two, five leading to the four. So that's gonna sound like this.


Start to the season she wanted off and so likewise 83 also off so that brought out another safety car. Christopher parrott involved in that but then great fights for third place especially as costello took the lead. Toth involved in a battle for second, third and fourth. A couple more offs that brought out another safety car. Some racing incidents. Hodson great restart finally to go into second place and that's what nailed that for him but no one was gonna stop michael costello who wins.


Go on their website, i'll put that link in the description. It shows you all the features, you can obviously take notes, record audio, mark up pdfs, add photos, and it has that shape thingy if you do a crappy circle, it makes it into a good one. Again, it shows you everything, it has integration into your apple watch, you can upload it to the usual suspects here for your cloud, even works on your phone if you have one as well. But the phone doesn't work with the pencil which is too bad, i would love to have even just on my phone to be able to quickly take the notes. Well, let's switch to noteshelf. So you can create, i mean you have a quick selection here to create your book, you can have a new one, you put in your color, your name, there are lots of options just to kind of decorate this if you so desire, i don't really care too much. These are empty books, i just created that so you can see there is a list. I usually stick with obviously that one that i'm working on.


This shade of blue in my closet because i think it looks really good with the tan so definitely gonna be packing this with me next up we've got this little gray tank the material of all of their clothes are so soft like i don't know how they do it but it's so buttery soft and really flattering to the body like it just hugs you in all the right places so this is just a basic spaghetti strap crop top this is so easy to throw on if you're working out if you're going for a walk if you're running errands like you could honestly style this a bunch of different ways if you're not just working out now that i've got this one i need in every single color. I love it so much. It is it's perfect. Okay. Here's the next top i think this one's my favorite so far i can't


They're finally they're like, i need a job, right? So as long as you show your sincere about it, because it almost is like a mad dash to get bodies back in stores, you really got to be mindful of that. But they're gonna bring you on if you're if you're genuine, if you're if you're being honest and upfront with them, it's almost hard to say no to this to this person that's interviewing for a part time job that has open availability. You know, they followed up that set themselves apart. Hopefully these tips work. If they don't, i mean, keep hitting me up with questions. I'll address them all. These are just some of the things that have worked for me. And that, you know, while my time managing at finish line, i've noticed, set a couple of the interviewees apart. I hope you enjoyed this video, drop down in the comments, continue to subscribe, continue to like the video. I ain't got nothing else for y 'all. It's a quick video. Peace.


Connect with it and a lot of people don't actually feel comfortable enough to be vulnerable online so they'll reach out to you and say thank you so much for sharing this because i've been feeling this and i wasn't sure that someone else was neglecting old friends blatant snide so this one i suppose is quite self -explanatory it's very easy to feel excluded and be exclusive on social media as well. It's something that i think we all struggle with and yeah


Let me stick this guy, every time i interview him, i spank him every time, i pull his trousers down, i say, you naughty boy, you naughty boy. Why would you want to peel another man? Why would you want to peel my trousers down? Sadly, you've got a nice butt. Your friends do that, your friends do that, your friends, i watch everything, i watch everything. My job is to watch everything. Do you like my bum? I've got another question for you, do you like my bum? No, i'm very alpha, i'm very alpha, i'm very alpha. Let's shift gears, let's shift gears for a second, let's shift gears for a second. If you're defending, you're losing, that's what they say. Hooker, ramirez. Hey! We're right back to what we're here for. Both guys, we thank.


I literally am obsessed. I'm so happy that i got this because i was running out of my old pack. It was the small, basic, like i think five color pack. And i've had that for literally like two years. So i saw this at target and i picked it up. I'm really excited. I'm gonna use this a lot for when i'm taking notes because i like taking pretty notes. So yeah, this is from target. And then this is my bullet journal. Yeah, it's a simple bullet journal. It's the one where it has like a really hard name to pronounce. Luke, luke term, look term.


Didn't expect that if i'm being a hundred percent honest. I didn't expect that i wasn't gonna make a video initially but i put out a tweet saying yay, and there was already a lot of confusion, which is understandable there is so much confusion around what is happening in america right now with the tariffs and there's a couple of points that i want to get to with that but first let's actually look at the prices of stuff so pre -orders for switch 2 will begin on thursday april 24th at launch the price of the switch 2 in the us will remain as announced on april 2nd at 40 at $449 .99 and the switch to mario kart bundle will also remain at $499 .99 mario kart world and donkey kong haven't changed their price which in the case of mario kart world we'll just say that's good


Let me show you the rest so i have this pair from h &m and i got the same exact pair but in red it's christmasy for this time of year, but also you could wear red anytime red is a universal color it's not like you just need to wear it in december and i've been obsessed with red burgundy like all those colors lately so it's very on point for me right now, but look at how cute let me give you guys a close -up look at how freaking cute and you can see the material. It's very loungey very soft they're low -waisted which i love and these are the exact same pants i have on right now i got these in an extra small. I am so obsessed. They're just so freaking comfortable i think i got them for 30 something dollars on sale and then as you could see the red matching top as i'm literally wearing right now. If you take a closer look at the material it's like super cute


Take us through them. Well, casual swearing was one of those that was particularly mentioned. The guide actually points out things like this machine's cactus or spit the dummy or even bring a plate as terms that won't be well understood and perhaps worth avoiding. But, you know, i think it's probably going too far to put words on a hit list. Most australians, and i think part of the richness of our culture is the language. And i think the goal is to use it, not neglect it, not hide from it, but make sure we're clear in explaining it, because there is a lot of irony around the australian language and new arrivals certainly find it a little bit perplexing. So do sometimes younger people as they hear the old timers use these phrases. Ok, mark, thank you very much for that. Appreciate it. Cheers.


How do you down -regulate at night and increase the quality of sleep? Not how do i sleep longer? How do i get knocked out better, right? This is about increasing the quality of sleep and helping you get to sleep faster. Most people have six to eight hours to dedicate to sleep. Problem is they're either they don't fall asleep right away or it's really ineffective sleep. And so how do you make sure that window that you actually have is a lot of it starts with behaviors and setting yourself up to win to sleep. But there's also some really awesome things you can do. Awesome product if that's where you're at. But you should probably like as a consumer, there's like 10 things that you should do to make your sleep better than before you start buying products. You should just stop doing activities, drinking late, caffeine later in the day.


You are a professional English-to-Hindi translator. Your goal is to accurately convey the meaning and nuances of the original English text while adhering to Hindi grammar, vocabulary, and cultural sensitivities. Produce only the Hindi translation, without any additional explanations or commentary. Translate the following text:


Bhambhu Thakur was informant-complainant .


the petitioner challenges its correctness .


this application is accordingly allowed .


this application is accordingly dismissed .


mere technicalities need not interfere .


tetrahydrocannababinol is its key constituent .


accordingly , the revision is dismissed .


his daughter was missing since 14.6.1992 .


skin was also identified with tattooing .


the police officer took their statements .


PW-8 Ravindra Singh is his co-relation .


22- PW-14 is the Investigating Officer .


the result was announced on 23.05.2011 .


the incident was witnessed by co-villagers .


cognizance was taken against the accused .


Ramanuja continues to live in Realaiga .


Dinesh Chaudhury was injured and unconscious .


both the sentences shall run concurrently .


Pankaj Chaudhury is already in custody .


all of them were independent witnesses .


the report is under different headings .


what would subsequently be not prescribed .


the jurisdiction should be specifically conferred .


the concerned miscellaneous petitions are closed .


appeal was filed by the defendantrespondents .


which does not require any interference .


this order is wholly without jurisdiction .


the petitioner must be released forthwith .


the sentences were to run concurrently .


the writ application stands disposed of .


heard learned counsel for the appellant .


they were carrying dagger and revolver .


the plaintiffs had never challenged it .


learned Additional Public Prosecutor is present .


further promotion will not be entitled .


all other legal consequences would follow .


something that was important and relief .


effect of injury : Maheshwari Sah fallen .


twenty - five years have already passed .


which have already been displayed as exhibit .


accordingly , this writ petition is dismissed .


Kanhaiya Jha had snatched his wrist watch .


8- Accordingly , this application is allowed .


his testimony cannot be lightly brushed aside .


the Panchayat was provided at the door .


he was allegedly assaulted by the appellant .


the document was undisputedly submitted on 30.08.2010 .


this will unnecessarily delay the matter only .


15- The writ application is disposed of .


she informed her husband about this fact .


thereafter , she was taken to Haldwani .


other witnesses have deposed about the incident .


the trial court had considered each evidence .


the officer incharge was carrying two persons .


one mobile was recovered from Bhola Kusha .


the identification table is marked as Ext.-6 .


thereafter , he was ready on 26.11.2011 .


his statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.


all aspects including reservation have been considered .


Bihar Public Service Commission also recommended there .


Government policy was there for the absorption .


Ramanuja Chaudhury had instigated to shoot him .


his father ' s brothers live separately .


she had not sustained any gun-shot injury .


Ram Kumar Choudhary was armed with firearms .


Binoy Kumar Choudhary was armed with farsa .


apparently Sanjay was missing from his house .


accordingly , the title appeal was dismissed .


the appellants were further sent for trial .


he had appeared and contested the case .


therefore , no interference is called for .


21- PW-4 is the most important witness .


the reply was considered by the authority .


the State is supposed to act unarbitrarily .


no such definitive evidence has been placed .


there was no enmity between these people .


12- Accordingly , this appeal is allowed .


the incident was witnessed by the villagers .


10- Resultantly , this order is allowed .


the departmental appeal was dismissed on 04.04.2011 .


it will vitiate the impugned order of suspicion-


other allegations were denied by the defendant .


they were employees employed under the defendant-appellants .


the equipments were opened by the appellant .


Tek Narayan Prasad was the original plaintiff .


6- The defendants filed their written statements .


the propounder must explain the suspicious circumstances .


the learned trial court shall proceed accordingly .


9- Accordingly , the writ application is allowed .


thus , the prosecution relies on such statements .


the incident was seen in the electrical light .


soon after , the injured Maheshwar Sah died .


they are discharged of their respective bail bonds .


18- Accordingly , an order has been made .


no attention was paid to a legal notice .


which can be made use of such revisional jurisdiction


three sale deeds were executed by the defendants .


he was also accompanied by two unknown persons .


the present case is again one such case .


she had shown her house from a distance .


the person has been identified in the court .


he feigned ignorance about the path and place .


he had given all information to the police .


police had inquired about the matter to him .


he had taken the restatement of the informant .


the land should , therefore , be settled .


the time spent after death was 24 hours .


21- Consequently , both the appeals are allowed .


Krishna Yadav identified Upendra Chaudhury as his son .


12- PW4 is the informator of this case .


she identified the written report ( Ext.-1 ) .


16- PW-8 is the victim of the incident .


Krishna Yadav was present there with two others .


she also identified the two in the court .


where the cause of the proceedings has arisen .


these two petitions do not help the appellants .


the facts of this case are quite different .


5- PW-2 is the uncle of Mujibur Rahman .


the State delayed the matter without any reason .


that right cannot be deprived of the petitioner .


this term was concluded in the year 2011 .


this is not available in the present case .


deceased Manoj Chaudhary was running to save him .


both the chambers of the heart were empty .


after investigation , he submitted the charge sheet .


he noticed that Manoj Kumar Choudhary was holding .


Dinesh Chowdhary and Manoj Chaudhary had fallen down .


the injury report was received by the police .


otherwise , it would not be a compromise .


I shall in his evidence point out improbabilities .


both PWs 3 and 4 support the prosecution .


hence , the suit itself was not maintainable .


the impugned order is allowed the cancelled application .


he had travelled by train the whole night .


she had accompanied them by her own will .


he was thereafter taken to the police station .


the police party , however , stopped him .


they have been declared hostile by the prosecution .


PW-12 is the Investigating Officer of the case .


she died during the pendency of this appeal .


no transfer of any property can be made .


this second appeal is , thus , allowed .


9- Now , the issue of jurisdiction comes .


21- Accordingly , the writ application is allowed .


this point is accordingly decided against the plaintiff-appellant .


there was no injury on her private parts .


no sperm was found in his vaginal discharge .


she had worked there for about three years .


he thereafter told his mother about the incident .


she had told her uncle about the incident .


26- The defence has also examined two witnesses .


such a marriage is not permissible in law .


several other facts have also been pointed out .


it is recommended or recommended in most cases .


18- Accordingly , this writ petition is dismissed .


( e ) 25 years after pensionable service .


that order , therefore , had become final .


counter affidavit and response thereto are on record .


8- Accordingly , the writ petition is allowed .


initially the suit was decreed by the compromise .


11- Accordingly , this writ application is allowed .


he ran there and found a human skeleton .


list of transactional engineers is Annexure - 2 .


in fact , no departmental proceedings were pending .


but the trial for promotion cannot be excluded .


11- Accordingly , the writ petition is allowed .


8- The defendants have also produced documentary evidence .


the petitioner was only allotted room No. 33 .


this is intended to deal with a contingency .


this has been illegally sealed by the respondents-authorities .


none of those witnesses has ever been declared hostile .


all the three assailants had fled towards the north .


they had pleaded Sunita , hence the trial proceeded .


for this , the prosecution has examined four eye-witnesses .


the informant narrated the incident which was around 8 p.m.


this evidence has come in para 3 of PW1 .


hence his conviction under Section 302 IPC is upheld .


all the wounds were besieged by the black region .


as noticed above , Will is marked as Exhibit-1 .


the testator had signed each page of the will .


an opportunity will be given to make a representation .


the representation was made on 29th July , 2013 .


the petitioner prays that the said representation be considered .


accordingly , the suit of the plaintiff was decreed .


the investigation can also be ordered by the CBI .


this argument is taken note of only to reject .


it is just being made to cover their failure .


persons in three positions have been employed on contract .


the said miscellaneous case was also dismissed on 16.03.2012 .


hence , he has to be dealt with accordingly .


in such circumstances , the petitioner should be prosecuted .


he tested and found the weapons and ammunitions effective .


the said notice was duly answered by the petitioner .


the interlocutory application No.700 of 2013 is disposed of .


obviously , the petitioner has failed in that test .


there is no dispute on this finding of fact .


he was armed with Lathi , Bhala and Pharsa .


Nago Singh had brought his two sons on horse .


2- The subject matter is in a short compass .


a departmental proceeding was also initiated against the delinquent .


the delinquent cannot have any further cause of action .


he is also a attestation witness of the fardbeyan .


20- In the result , this appeal is allowed .


these facts are not disputed in the counter affidavit .


no provision of appeal has been arranged against it .


it does not exclude judicial review under Article 226 .


the case was committed to the Court of Session .


that person disclosed his name to Prem Prakash Yadav .


he had provided the telephone number to the police .


the man who accompanied him went away leaving him .


as has been calculated by the learned trial court .


he has no idea where VIP bag was seized .


the seizure list has already been marked as Exhibit-3 .


they have fully supported the case of the prosecution .


21- In the result , these appeals are dismissed .


the police had taken both the persons into custody .


a telephone number was given of Bettiah Police Station .


at that time , Bhola had also accompanied her .


on 27.11.2011 , he left the train for Bettiah .


but Bhola had remained with her for a day .


he has proved the formal FIR ( Exh.7 ) .


confessional statement of Krishna Yadav was recorded on 07.12.2011 .


thereafter , they took them to hospital for treatment .


12- PW-3 Arvind Kumar is the brother of the informant-


4- PW-4 Md . Hasal is brother 's gotra .


in this context , two facts may be noted .


12- In the result , this appeal is allowed .


7- They had been working in the same manner .


the facts of the present case are totally different .


thus , the matter was reached the Supreme Court .


the informator was taken to Sadar Hospital for treatment .


Gopal Chaudhary ' s business is in the serai .


Dinesh Chaudhury ' s house is from the east .


he has supported the case of prosecution like PW-1 .


the cervical cavity contained blood clots and brain material .


formal FIR by way of Exh.5 has been proved .


he did not examine how they got their injuries .


17 . PW-3 is the son of Dinesh Choudhary .


Ram Kumar Choudhary had come there armed with pistol .


he admitted that there is Government Hospital in Begusai .


he had not gone to Government Hospital at Bedusai .


such injuries are not fatal and are not visible .


13- I have heard learned counsels for the parties .


she also claims that Sanjay used to take tuition .


the aforesaid suggestion has been denied by the witnesses .


his name was also given by the former landlord .


the other witnesses are the eye-witnesses of the incident .


Hon 'ble Rakesh Kumar , J. Madhulay and others .


respectively marked as exhibit Exts.2 , 3 and 4 .


they had raped her for about 10 days continuously .


she states that police did not record her statement .


she was moving from place to place without resistance .


I also agree with the test in that case .


8- In the result , this appeal is allowed .


after declaring them hostile , the prosecution examined them .


the sample was taken from one or two packets .


no inventory was prepared to justify the seized guarantee .


the material exhibits were never produced in the court .


hence , the accused is entitled to be acquitted .


it is mentioned that she has constructed a temple .


the plaintiff is not a member of the family .


in my opinion , there is no such protest .


he had no jurisdiction at all in the matter .


both the persons had died in the same accident .


one who declares the age of youth or child .


whenever she offered marriage to him , she denied .


19- PW-2 is Dr. ( Smt ) Annapurna Singh .


his age was assessed between 19 - 20 years .


20- PW-3 Raj Kumar Paswan is an hearsay witness .


Harendra Sah ( PW-3 ) was the witness of fardbeyan .


the wound was on the right side of the stomach .


it was within 20 hours of its passing after death .


however , both the sentences are directed to run concurrently .


6- We are unable to agree with Mr. Rajendra Prasad .


6- The appellants and Naval Kishore Sharma were also tried .


the petitioner being the youngest son performed her last rites .


the said Will was the last will of the testator .


the will executed by the testator at Ex . 1 .


AWI Ram Bahadur Singh is one of the attesting witnesses .


the Will was executed by the testator in his favour .


the will and its contents are proved by the witnesses .


however , none has appeared on behalf of respondent no.5 .


5- The petition is disposed of in the above terms .


this fact has not been disputed by defendant-respondent No. 1 .


the judgment and decree of the trial court are recalled .


it seems that my boy has died of the injury .


today the dicker of the crashed car is switched off .


9- For the aforesaid reason , we allow this appeal .


as mentioned above , the petitioner was in this panel .


the said agreement is Appendix 5 of the present application .


thus , they have supported the case of the prosecution .


the incident is of 1997 and aged about 10 years .


he had , therefore , invested huge amounts of money .


as a result , the running decisions are set aside .


this could not have been ruled out by the appellants .


the said order is meaningless in the eyes of law .


he submits that many persons were appointed on compassionate ground .


the cross examination was not successful in refuting its veracity .


15- The impugned judgment , therefore , is set aside .


PW10 Sachchidananda Choudhury is the Investigating Officer of the case .


8- PW-8 Ravinder Singh is the informator of the case .


thereafter Ravinder landed from the bus and gave five rupees .


the said amendment application was rejected by the appellate court .


that evidence has been considered by both the courts below .


Ram Naresh Singh picked up some things from a box .


accused persons also fired gun in the course of escape .


13- For the aforesaid reason , the appeal is allowed .


the respondent is directed to co-operate in the departmental proceedings .


5- The Tribunal has been created by a statutory order .


therefore , no offence is made out under this section .


the defence of the accused persons is of false implication .


she also stated that one day telephone had been received .


after taking her child , she had returned to Kahalgaon .


he had given a written notice in the police station .


14 . PW-8 is the Investigating Officer of this case .


PW-6 is the paternal grand-father and informant- of the victim .


the literal meaning of the landless should be given effect .


the injury caused by fire arms was ante-mortem in nature .


the defence of the accused is that they are innocent .


Krishna Yadav alias Maama was also with the police party .


thereafter , Krishna had moved forward and others followed him .


he is a workman only for the last 4 years .


she also stated that police party was armed with firearms .


thereafter PWs 5 , 6 and 7 had been banished .


she also identified her signature ( Ext.3 / 2 ) .


instead of her living , she had changed every time .


he has identified his signature ( Exh.4 ) on 9.12.2011 .


he had climbed into the train and had gone home .


she identified her signatures at Ex . 4 / 5 .


he does not know the name of the old man .


source of information has been received from PW-7 Rajendra Singh .


there is no likelihood of any confusion in the FIR .


50- Resultantly , the reference of death is set aside .


Bhola Thakur was beaten by Kapil Thakur with a stick .


this witness has answered that Pulani was on his ground .


there was no default on the part of the petitioner .


which is vested to assist the change in a right .


thus seen , the petitioner had right to be absorbed .


the payment was exonerated in compliance of the judicial direction .


it has prepared one of the grounds of its removal .


these proceedings were not initiated before the elections of 2006 .


in view of this , appendix 26 is also rescinded .


11- PW-2 is the informant and father of the deceased .


12- PW-3 is the informant and victim of the incident .


they informed the police about the arrival of the injured .


he collected blood stained earth from the place of incident .


in the meanwhile , Ram Kumar Choudhary fired the shot .


she saw that Manoj Kumar Choudhary had received gunshot injury .


leave behind his mentioned heirs lies behind him in heaven .


14- Order XXIII Rule 3 deals with compromise of suit .


he is in custody for 3 months and 29 days .


4- Both the parties have produced oral and documentary evidence .


the appellant Gopal Singh had placed a pistol on him .


she also admits that childhood is four kilometres from Samasa .


thereafter , she used to live with one Mukesh Singh .


there , too , he did not make any disclosure .


the appellant Umesh Ram did not meet inside the house .


Jayakal Devi was arrested and brought to the police station .


however , nothing material could come out from their cross-examination .


he states that a woman was caught outside the house .


he also admits he had not gone inside the house .


he also admits that the seized ganja was not sealed .


all these witnesses were present when the bomb was thrown .


the plaintiff and his father were staying with Bageshwar Kunar .


the mutawalli is also not a member of the family .


this is apparent from Annexure-3 , which is dated 15.09.1989 .


it is this main order which is under challenge effectively .


he challenged this order on two grounds , inter alia .


it cannot be presumed or cannot be included in it .


the Committee of Management , therefore , came into the minority .


Ex . 1 / A — Dedger signed by Lutto Manjhi .


death took place in shock and haemorrhage from Injury No. 1 .


Parash Sah is not a stranger as he is a neighbour .


some of the witnesses have stated that Parash Sah caught Maheshwari .


he is not held guilty and is acquitted of the charge .


the suggestion was also given at the back of her husband .


he claims to be in this business since 1986 - 87 .


no property was filed by anyone including relatives near the testator .


an amendment petition was filed seeking amendment of the main application .


counter affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the respondents .


however , they had taken a lot of money from home .


none is present on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 .


the same is true for Appellate Authority and Board of Revenue .


( II ) there is no evidence of payment of rent ;


no documentary evidence was produced in support of the said claim .


Hon 'ble NALAYA PRASAD SINGH , J. Oudh Kishore Thakur , J.


one additional post can help the petitioner only , if any .


the parties , however , have to bear their own costs .


4- The Informant has extended the revisional jurisdiction of this Court .


the petitioner has not examined any defence witness in his defence .


therefore , the appropriate explanation is available on the record itself .


it is also clear that it contains the signatures of ACJM .


copy of the said order is marked to the writ petitioner .


this witness had proved the admission order as Ex . 1 .


the aforesaid circumstance , therefore , raises suspicion about the prosecution .


therefore , the aforesaid contradiction raises a suspicion about the prosecution .


evidence which creates confidence to contradict an injured witness is necessary .


which indicates the performance of the duties of Simati Sinha regularly .


the government considers your action to be merely pretentious and positive .


14- Thus , two things become clear from his aforesaid explanation .


Ex.2 Krishan Dev Mandal has been declared hostile by the prosecution .


at that time , Kumar was going to Kurseong by Katihar .


7- PW-1 , Krishna Mahto is the informant-in-charge of the case .


as a matter of fact , the bank failed to respond .


if respondent No.6 was not appointed , he raised a dispute .


on his confirmation , Lal Kunda and thereafter came to Haldwani .


he had not come to Haldani to take any of them .


thereafter both of them had gone from the rickshaw to Ramnagar .


she had an opportunity to talk to her parents at Haldani .


these appeals have no merit and are dismissed for this reason .


according to the doctor , the girl was habitual to cohabitation .


Vishwanath Agarwal Versus Sarla Nath Agarwal ( 2012 ) 7 SCC 288


3 . lacerated wound present on right side of neck with injury


after 3-4 days , the police came there at about 7-8 p.m.


after 3 - 4 kilometres , there was a sugarcane field .


the police officer had asked Krishna where he had kept Sardar .


he also stated that Krishan Yadav disclosed his name on telephone .


after crossing the river , Krishna gave the boatman the money .


in the night , she heard the voices of some persons .


relying on his statement , he had come to Krishna Yadav .


for this reason , the prosecution case should not be believed .


thus , we do not find any merit in their appeals .


there was a abrasion on the back of the right thumb .


14- PW5 Arun Kumar Thakur is the informator of this case .


she has stated that she sustained injuries on her left hand .


he came to this Court long before the Rules of 2003 .


they cannot be held unfit now and cannot be taken out .


because at that time the Selection Commission was not in existence .


the writ was decided in her favour by order dated 16.03.2009 .


Indian Penal Code , 1860 - Section 304 , Part II .


the left parital and occipital bones of the skull were broken .


it is not true that Dinesh Choudhury was building a house .


the body of Manoj Kumar Choudhary was taken to the hospital .


other grounds too , too , may shock the inner mind .


the evidence of these witnesses is consistent , reliable and trustworthy .


PW-5 Investigating Officer has also found blood stains on the spot .


the said fine is to be paid to the victim girl .


he also alleges that his brother Mrityunjaya Kumar was also present .


thus the involvement of Kishori Mohan and Mritunjaya Kumar becomes suspicious .


he claims that he had not intervened in the ongoing tussle .


Mandhata Singh , J. — Heard learned counsels for the parties .


advocate . - Mr . VISKN , Form V or App ;


after her marriage , she was residing in her matrimonial home .


8- PW3 is the informant-in-aid of the case of Parmanand Choudhary .


he stated the age of his daughter as between 15-16 years .


he had prepared her daughter to go to cinema with him .


she had climbed into a train and there was the Leghinarai .


Mukesh Singh used to commit rape on each day with him .


the doctor has assessed his age between 17 and 19 years .


he was kept confined for about two and a half months .


there is no evidence that while travelling , she was unconscious .


she neither raised alarm nor resisted or in any manner whatsoever .


some co - villagers were provided with vehicles to draw loads .


the investigation officer was not a member of the raid party .


only the presence of this accused-appellant is stated by these witnesses .


hence , for the aforesaid relief , the suit was filed .


according to Hindu law , an idol is a judicial person .


no inherent power exists in any authority as declared by them .


it is the order of the managing committee of the Madarsa .


it is not a case of total non-consideration of the evidence .


the Investigating Officer of the case has been examined as PW-6 .


13- Now , I take over the merits of the case .


the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence .


he has proved the written report , which is at Ex .


she states that the Lok Sabha elections were held on 16.6.1996 .


in her examination of the chief she fancies to be unmarried .


23- PW-6 Poonam Kumari is the Investigating Officer of the case .


his examination has no explanation on the part of the prosecution .


he submits that the instant petition deserves to be rejected directly .


Ex . 3 . endorsement and forwarding of endorsement by the officer-in-charge .


injury no.1 died and injury No. 2 was the result of stitches .


Devaki Sah stabbed the matter in the right side of Maheshwari Sah .


hence , the case of Paras Sah is entirely on different ground .


M / I - A scar of old wound right from forehead .


Rule 3 of the Rules provides the qualifications for a deed writer .


5- Mr. Rajendra Prasad , learned counsel has appeared for the appellants .


thereafter , no examination has been conducted for the last 12 years .


neither any objection nor any representation had been filed on his behalf .


this Court granted opportunity to N.R. 2 to file objections and objections .


they claim to identify the signature of their father on the will .


he also identified the Will ( marked as Ex . 1 ) .


the execution of the Will was the voluntary act of the testator .


advocate . - Mr . Jetcea Prasied , Bud Notifications , Mr .


the defendant had filed a title appeal before the lower appellate court .


when they came here they found that they had not received money .


the incident has happened due to the negligence driving of the vehicle .


4- The claim was contested by the appellant who is a purchaser .


the non-recording of his findings by the lower authority vitiate the order .


the defendant had also denied to pay any rent to the plaintiff .


in the absence of which the authority could not consider his case .


this Court is not interested in what had happened in the meanwhile .


heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent .


their evidence has been dealt with by the trial court very seriously .


there is no such disclosure that it was ever signed by PW-2 .


the aforesaid incident was caused in the background of the land dispute .


4- The suit property is mentioned in Schedule 1 of the plaint .


thus , Dr. Sinha appears to be guilty of the said absence .


I also sent the application for special leave on 14.05.03 by post .


operational Practitioners – Sub Secretary , Health Department , Bihar , Patna .


27- With the aforementioned observations and reference , this application is decanted .


she also sustained injuries on her right hand and neck by others .


this witness has proved his written report by way of Exhibit 2 .


now , therefore , this issue was not before the trial court .


Jamuna Devi , mother of Ram Kumar Singh , was also there .


at the time of escape , they were locked in a room .


in the absence of Panchas , he handed over both the sons .


after two days , Ram Kumar Singh had returned both the children .


the delinquent had urged that he be relieved from the suspension forthwith .


what the petitioner wanted was to revoke the suspension and nothing more .


8- PW-2 Gauri Mehto is the uncle and informant-in-law of the deceased .


10- PW-4 Champa Devi is the informator and mother of the deceased .


in the light of his evidence , he has been declared hostile .


this fact is secondary for the reason that it had more marks .


5- Under the observations made above , this persistent application is allowed .


6- With the aforesaid change of sentence , the appeal stands dismissed .


one day the kidnappers had advised him to talk to the sea .


two persons had asked him whether he had brought the entire amount .


12- PW-G is the informant-in-law and is the grandfather of the victim .


the prosecution has been able to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt .


3- To substantiate the prosecution case , 8 witnesses have been examined .


this version has been brought before this Court for the first time .


Hon 'ble Rakesh Kumar , J. Hon 'ble Dr. Naresh Sharma , J.


he applied for settlement of the suit land through his Commandant Officer .


the Collector handed over the file to DLR for enquiry and report .


( ii ) Whether the lower Court has misconstrued and misinterpreted Ex.-II .


it provides that precedence should be given while entering into a settlement :


( E ) to refugees from East Pakistan and Verma after 1.1.1964 .


if this submission is accepted , it will create confusion and chaos .


the lower appellate court had recorded that the plaintiff is not landless .


hence , I do not find any force in this second appeal .


the appellants are on bail and are accordingly discharged of their liability .


prior to this incident , he had never seen Upendra with Krishna .


he has been identified in the Court as Krishna Yadav and Ravi .


he also stated that Krishan Yadav and others demanded ransom through telephone .


during this period , Krishna had also talked to her on mobile .


he also went to jail after the victim of the identification parade .


identification table is marked as Ext . 5 and 5 / 1 .


Krishna Yadav was there with three persons and offered tea and biscuits .


he identified Krishna , Chandeshwar , Upendra and Bhola in the court .


he also identified his mobile , which was recovered from Ravi Mahes .


I read out my statement and made the signature as correct . "


the defence was to be false implication on account of Panchayat elections .


PW-6 admits that a distant Rahman had filed a case against him .


thus , the court remains only the sole evidence of PW-6 informant .


she has not given any description about the injuries sustained by her .


he had thus worked before the 2003 Rules for almost a decade .


it had compelled the petitioner to file many suits and not one .


the authority cannot refuse to act on its own will or will .


many persons had come there after being panic and saw the incident .


there are three sons of Umu Choudhary , Kanhaiya and Kundan Choudhary .


the land dispute is going on between Dinesh Choudhary and Umesh Choudhary .


both the signatures have been noted as Ext . 1 and 1 .


Dinesh Chaudhary , Umesh Choudhary and Ramesh Choudhary are the real brothers .


she has stated that she had sustained injuries only with an axe .


one bullet was recovered from the right parabolic region of the brain .


the bullet must have been fired from a distance of 1 meters .


he has proved the fardbayan which is marked as Ex . -A .


he also states that these injuries cannot be manufactured by friendly hands .


he cannot say whether the police referred them to the Government Hospital .


Dinesh Chaudhary and Shikant Choudhary have not been explained the injuries suffered .


the case prepared by Rashid is that she went to the college .


therefore , after the gift , the name of the jamabandi mother .


therefore , no finding could be recorded in favour of the plaintiff .


he also admits that there is a land dispute between the parties .


11- PW-7 Md . Yusuf is an eye witness of the incident .


this , according to the doctor , is a life threatening condition .


13- PW10 Ram Bal Singh is the Investigating Officer in this case .


all the appellants have been in custody for at least three weeks .


failure to pay compensation would result in simple imprisonment for three months .


however , she also undergone detention for about eight and a half months .


she has also not stated anything about the dowry and the period etc .


the petitioner has paid the said amount on 8.3.2013 under coercion and threat .


6- Subject to the above observations , the writ petition is disposed of .


during this time , the neighbour Paras Sah ( appellant ) had come .


7- The defence has examined only one witness , namely , Ramji Singh .


PW-8 has conducted post mortem examination on the dead body of Maheshwari Sah .


PW-2 is also a witness on seizure lists nos . 5 and C .


( I ) two wounds on the inner border of left front arm .


( IV ) Four wounds on the upper surface of the right hand .


admittedly , the appellants have not passed the license examination the deed writer .


the aforesaid injuries were clearly visible at the time of the alleged incident .


he must have attained the age of 80 in today ' s date .


the petitioner is on bail , hence he is discharged of his liability .


a prayer has been made for the grant of probate of the will .


testatrix executed a Will in the month of October or September , 2006 .


this witness has identified the signatures of the attesting witnesses on the Will .


he admits that the Bihar Public Service Commission has received the aforesaid representation .


judgments were produced which are marked as Exhibits 7 & 7 / A .


the area of the land in Ext . D is only 3 Kathas .


the plaintiff has produced documentary evidence since 1917 in support of his case .


according to respondent no.5 , he is a co-sharer and a proximate ryot .


the appellant also challenged the claim of respondent No.5 being a nearby ryot .


the area of the plot in question is 7 Kathas and 10 axles .


the petitioner in this panel was in sixth number being a general category .


the Court orders where his case may be considered in accordance with law .


12- The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid test and reference .


during the course of the statement , he had merely denied the incident .


with regard to the incident , paras 8 and 9 are also present .


during cross-examination the defence may not be able to rebut his evidence . "


more than that , as it is today , he is on bail .


the licence was granted for a period up to 31st December , 2004 .


cognizance of the offence was taken and the appellant was put on trial .


2- Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh , learned counsel has appeared for the petitioner .


14 . I shall deal with each one of the issues by one .


I ' m not going to see anyone at Baroda ' s house .


in Monger I left in Monghyr to get round and check and rest .


a certificate has also been given by the head of the Baroda section .


in such a situation leave can be granted as casual leave on 14.05.2003 .


Dr. Simati Sinha can be relieved of the charge mentioned in the Annexure .


Vice Secretary of the Government . . . 25 . 5 . 04 .


whereas the appellant Mohd . Alam had been able to escape from there .


his bag had already been snatched and then he was assaulted by Farasa .


this witness has also stated that he again regained consciousness in the hospital .


the plaintiffs were always ready and willing to pay the balance consideration amount .


they have given evidence of their willingness in support of their respective claims .


while Chano Singh gave lathi blow on him as well as Kunti Devi .


Ram Shankar Singh and Rajendra Singh were the witnesses to prove the FIR .


the admission scrutiny of the evidence of the witnesses during trial is inevitable .


hence , the concurrent findings of the courts in question are set aside .


6- In my view , this submission has been noticed only for rejection .


6- The Tribunal is a quasi judicial body constituted to decide a case .


even in his cross-examination , he has supported the case of the prosecution .


PW-7 is the doctor who has found the girl for about 14-15 years .


8- The appeal is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid modification in the sentence .


on 24.07.2012 the matter was again heard and was taken up for hearing .


on these findings , the trial Court dismissed the suit of the plaintiff .


the recovered from the wound is being forwarded under a FB seal cover .


7- The prosecution in support of its case has examined the following witnesses .


he identified the accused Bhola Mahto , who was present in the Court .


he only knew the name of Krishna , his parents were not named .


PW-8 and Krishan had boarded the boat and the remaining two had returned .


PW-8 and Krishna had walked for about 45 minutes and reached a hut .


earlier , he had installed a Raeling machine in the State of Jharkhand .


9- 10 persons were put before him and the accused persons had identified .


at the instance of Krishna Yadav , he went to the station chowk .


he has also stated that he had taken him to a snail vehicle .


three more persons came there identified as accused Ravi , Liberation and Dashrath .


an old man of the village had come to him and opened it .


two persons came there and their names were Mukti Narayan Choudhury and Dasaratha .


PW-6 is Madan Kumar Pandey who has examined two injured in this case .


PW-6 contradicts each other with regard to injury on the person of the informant-


the remainder was to seek a concurrence only of Bihar Public Service Commission .


the argument on behalf of the State , thus , cannot be accepted .


25- The writ petitions are thus allowed with the aforesaid observations and directions .


on 10.05.2005 , one of Poonam Kumari was appointed as an education friend .


having reached the present status , they could be made non - entitled .


no one can be allowed to carry a whip on a dead horse .


merely because the power vested in the State Election Commission is not disputed .


he identified the two accused Pankaj Chaudhary and Shashi Choudhary in the Court .


his father ' s brothers live separately and are also divided into smats .


the death took place 12 hours at the time of post mortem examination .


they have proved the post mortem report , which is marked as Exhibit-2 .


in his opinion injuries No.1 , 2 and 3 are simple in nature .


both the injury reports are marked as Exhibits 3 & 3 / 1 .


he got information about the incident which was mentioned in the case diary .


situated on behalf of the defence , 3 Shikshanta Chaudhury has been examined .


5- Therefore , there is an inquiry on two aspects of this case .


the radiologist ’ s report would be very relevant to indicate his age .


after the settlement , permit was issued and rental receipt was also released .


hence , the property is properly recorded in the name of the defendant .


7- As stated above , none is present on behalf of the respondent .


present case has been filed under section 106 of the Bihar Tenancy Act .


no separate sentence has been passed under Section 323 of Indian Penal Code .


he submits that this document was not exhibited before the learned Claims Tribunal .


4- In the course of investigation , the victim prayed Devi was recovered .


in cross-examination , he states that the victim was married five years ago .


thereafter , Gopal Singh and Mukesh Singh had snatched his jewellery and stick .


she states that her signatures were obtained on four or five blank papers .


the train was stop at these stations for some time and then proceeded .


learned counsel would submit that the new Committee of Management has not been elected .


thus , the order passed on 10.12.2012 has lost its force after six months .


Akhilesh Chandra , J. — Both the appeals arise out of the same judgment .


they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment .


on Ex . 1 / B - fardbeyan , the signatures of Niru Manjhi .


necessary follow - up work will be carried out within a month from today .


Maheshwari Sah fainted on the way and its unconscious state continued till his death .


Devaki Sah and Suresh Sah started abusing Maheshwari Sah , whose answer was given .


the case of the prosecution that Maheshwari Sah was stabbed and properly set up .


the allegation that Maheshwari died due to stabbing by Dev Sah is well established .


hence , two parties have appeared in connection with the role of Paras Sah .


hence , his case stands on a different footing from that of Devaki Sah .


he is ordered to be released forthwith if not required in any other case .


he had stated that he had not found any blank work on the spot .


admittedly , the aforesaid land was PW-5 and the ancestral land of the appellants .


accordingly , the appellants are acquitted of the charges while granting benefit of doubt .


thus the aforesaid propounder is not going to support the plea of the petitioner .


the witness identified the signatures of the testatrix on each page of the Will .


3- Mr. Vikas Kumar , learned counsel has appeared for Bihar Public Service Commission .


Ext . 5 has been produced by the plaintiff in support of his case .


I do not yet know who my boys used to accompany Ravi Shankar Dwivedi .


14 . with the above observations , this writ application is hereby disposed of .


they have relied on the genealogy presented in Appendix 6 of the writ petition .


2- I shall refer to the position of the parties before the trial Court .


3- The State has filed a counter affidavit and the reply is on record .


it is not disputed that the petitioner has been participating in the execution proceedings .


the fact that the parties entered into a compromise is also not in dispute .


16 . consequently , the writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above .


V.N. Sinha , J. — Heard the petitioners and learned counsel for the State .


it is apparent from the record that the Investigating Officer has not been examined .


he also submitted that the complainant sustained seven injuries and he lost two teeth .


the fact of recovery is not supported even by any of the independent witnesses .


consequently , the running decisions do not justify it ' s over - riding .


he has contested the appeal and supported the order of the learned Single Judge .


the licence which had already expired could not have been renewed in any event .


14- The Registry to send a copy of this order to the respondent forthwith .


he had come out of the office and met the appellant outside the office .


this finding could have been recorded only in an appeal filed by the appellants .


6- For the aforesaid reason , this petition is dismissed at the very threshold .


the name of Punai Yadav is recorded as an occupancy ryot in survey works .


Dukuni Kunwar left behind her daughter Krishna Devi in 1970 and died in 1970 .


the dispute is whether the suit property was a part of the last division .


the plot no.2171 is the name of Punai Yadav and is measuring 17 Disil .


no lady physician official at Baroda headquarters is available with his own medical practitioner .


the certificate regarding treatment and other evidence was made available to the presiding officer .


7- Now , I shall proceed to deal with the evidence of other eye-witnesses .


9- PW4 Mice Singh is resident of Fuleria Chowk , the place of occurrence .


hence , the same matter cannot be cross - examined in this second appeal .


in evidence they had never claimed to be a part of the suit property .


thereafter both the accused persons ran away taking both her sons and the goods .


they did not enquire about the place for appointing their sons with Nagno Singh .


the petitioners are on bail , therefore , they are discharged of their liability .


as regards the said incident , a criminal case was registered against the delinquent .


8- The learned counsel , Mrs. Nilalu Agarwal , has appeared for the appellants .


they have relied upon the supplementary affidavit filed in the present Letters Patent Appeal .


they have taken us through the records and possible defence at the criminal trial .


before his arrival , Amit Kumar had fainted , fallen down and started trembling .


11- PW-5 Shri Ram Mahto is another brother of the deceased and the informant-in-law .


thus , his evidence is of no avail in support of the prosecution case .


in other words , the department wants to be benefited by its own default .


4- The counsel for the State submits that notice be issued to respondent No.6 .


the whole business seems to be negative in the way the tribunals are working .


the concern of the court is with serious infirmity in the decision making process .


the matter has to be remanded to the Tribunal even after it is present .


he has stated that both the children had gone to school from the rickshaw .


after about one hour , his father had lodged a report to the police .


he also stated that Sagar told him that Bina Devi used to beat him .


thereafter , she was also advised to talk to her mother and her grandfather .


the drawer had instructed the corner to accompany a VIP bag containing 786 monogram .


thus , his son was alone with wealth as the directions of the kidnapper .


he identified the written notice Ex . ( 171 ) , handwriting and endorsement .


on 14.09.2002 , he handed over charge of the investigation to the officer incharge .


she has proved some of the paragraphs of the case diary as exhibit A-2 .


15- PW9 is a formal witness who identified the seizure list ( Exh.3 ) .


these articles were recovered in respect of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 636 / 2001 .


there was a bargaining for the ransom and for the liberation of the victim .


when the daughter did not return , she had lodged a case on 08.07.1992 .


her intention was never to cause any harm to the cattle of the complainant .


the same party was taken by other witnesses who were examined during the investigation .


the suit land is situated at a distance of 50 bighas from the school .


according to the learned counsel , Exh.2 was the report of the Pleader Commissioner .


however , the defence has not led any evidence in support of its case .


PW4 disclosed in para 10 that he saw the deceased caught only one bullet .


he also stated that he knew Bhola Mahto and Krishna Yadav before the incident .


they had gone to sugarcane field , where Sardar was kept in a prisoner .


he has identified Krishna , Mukti Narain , Chandeshwar and Dashrath in the court .


after 2 days , Krishna had left alone and had gone towards the market .


in his cross-examination , he has stated that he is not the Investigating Officer .


he had conveyed the information to the Superintendent of Police through his Mobile No.9934260271 .


he had also enquired about the matter with the family members of Ravindra Singh .


in cross-examination , he has stated that he did not know Jarnail Singh earlier .


he left for Ambala Cantt and reached Gorakhpur on 27 . 11 . 2011 .


accused Ravi had come to him and had snatched bag of PW13 and mobile .


23- PW-1 has stated that accused Upendra Chaudhary and Chandeshwar Sah are his co-villagers .


death penalty can be desirable where the victims are innocent children and helpless women .


his cross - examination reveals that Vataka was about 15 Kathas under polemical orders .


according to the learned counsel for the appellants , this was one such case .


both the parties claim that the land was measured several times by the Amin .


8 . PW-6 sanctioned Alam is the informant-in-aid and injured person of this case .


no dispute or fact was raised with regard to the status of the petitioner .


inquest report was prepared and postmortem of the dead body of the deceased was done .


all the witnesses have pertinently stated that it was only the work of Maheshwari Sah .


therefore , Paras Sah cannot be held guilty and should be granted benefit of doubt .


( ii ) 4 wounds on the surface of the palm of the right hand .


( V ) eleven wounds on the lower side of abdomen on the left side .


( VI ) thirty wounds on the lateral side of left side of upper thigh .


( I ) a wound on the lower third part in front of left thigh .


the appellant is acquitted as he was justified in applying the right of private defence .


9 . interlocutory Application No. 8407 of 2011 and 8408 of 2011 are disposed of .


12 . we conclude with cautionary advice of the State Government and the Inspector General .


he had himself hidden in a pit , but Naval Kishore Sharma had chased him .


8- With the aforesaid modification in the sentence , the petition presented is disposed of .


however , during this period first information report was instituted and charge sheet was submitted .


the details of the said property are fully mentioned in Schedule 1 of the application .


affidavit was filed keeping on record the news papers in which the issues were published .


when the Will was executed by the testator , he was physically and mentally ill .


before signing the will , he had read and understood the contents of the Will .


the son of the testator , Ajit Kumar Singh also signed as a attesting witness .


the boundary mentioned therein does not match with the postulate mentioned in the present suit .


the other case of defendant-respondent no.1 is that the property was that of Murad Ali .


no money was found in the car even though he was carrying lot of money .


no proper investigation has been carried out to ascertain the true and the real developments .


it was argued that the plaintiff had filed a separate suit for recovery of rent .


learned counsel thus submitted that the impugned judgment and order does not warrant any interference .


in this manner , the departments of the Government will act as efficient parties . ”


the petitioner is also interested in drafting his appointment and obtaining roster NOCs for appointment .


the person appointing him shall be liable to pay the wages and not the State .


in the absence of any notice , the executing court cannot proceed according to them .


however , the FIR was seen by the Chief Judicial Magistrate , Saharsa on 13.11.1986 .


therefore , the order of law as prescribed under Section 361 Cr.P.C. has been violated .


therefore , the submission is that a running judgment is liable to be set aside .


however , on arrival of several persons , her father was taken for medical treatment .


however , keeping it in mind , the Magistrate had taken cognizance in the matter .


hence , during the course of revisional jurisdiction , it should not be interfered with .


the petitioner is in custody , therefore , he is directed to be released forthwith .


8- Mr. Divekar Prasad Singh , learned counsel has appeared for the respondent- writ petitioner .


whether the writ petitioner obtained the order dated 21.02.2008 or not is of no consequence .


the appellant was taken to the headquarters of the CBI where recovery memo was prepared .


thereafter , the hands and clothes were also placed in the solution which turned pink .


the new Act does not specify the date from which it shall come into force .


in the event of she being proved that she sustained injury during the said incident .


10- Mr. Sukumar Sinha , learned senior counsel has appeared on behalf of the appellant .


the information of which was also given by the petitioner to his controlling office bearer .


the accused officer ' s headquarters is at Barhiya 's private house at Neeraj Kumar .


http : / / ecomp . 15 . 03 . 04 . Dandia . Sahay .


the observation of the evidences itself makes it clear that my illness was no excuse .


13- That the statements made in para No.15 are not correct and are hereby rejected .


PW3 Ram Kishun Sah @ Krishna has been tendered by the prosecution for being examined .


at that time , a boy inflicted a farsa blow on the forehead of Ravinder .


the parties also agreed that the deed was to be executed and registered within 1.11.1987 .


so far as this conclusion is concerned , it is a pure finding of fact .


now he cannot change his side and say that the evidence should not be seen .


at the same time , the unknown criminals were preventing them from entering the room .


the evidence of PW2 in Principal examination further makes the version of the witness suspect .


hence , the learned Single Judge had declined to extend time and rejected the application .


the appellants should be permitted to proceed further in the departmental proceedings against the delinquent .


9- Mr. Kishore Kumar Thakur , learned counsel has appeared on behalf of the delinquent .


2- perused the records of Sessions trial received in compliance of our order dated 17.09.2013 .


PW4 had informed him that Amit Kumar has been assaulted by the appellant Kapala Ram .


in the aforesaid evidence of PW4 , he has been declared hostile by the prosecution .


the appellant is directed to be released forthwith if not required in any other case .


once carrying out formalities , the pension of the petitioner is to be restored forthwith .


for the same reason , it was not duly dealt with at the bank level .


it has become one more forum for trial , rather than one forum for trial .


it is not known whether any such measures have been taken by the State Government .


advocate . respondent / State Govt . of India & State Govt . of Himachal Pradesh


after investigation , charge sheet was submitted against all the appellants and Om Prakash Yadav .


after some days , another telephone call was received whereby the ransom demand was made .


he stated that the incident took place at about 7 : 00 am on 23.4.2002 .


he had gone to the place of occurrence and taken the statement of the witnesses .


he also took the statement of victim Sagar Kumar on 1.6.2002 and restatement on 8.8.2002 .


8- Having heard the arguments of both the parties , I have witnessed the record .


Cri.App. ( 28J ) No. 120 of 1996 . decided on 5th November , 2012 .


therefore , the order cancelling the settlement is illegal and not binding on the plaintiff .


according to the learned counsel , Ex.-C is the basis of the plaintiff 's case .


after due enquiry the land was settled by the SDO in favour of the plaintiff .


on these grounds , learned counsel submitted that the impugned judgment and decree is vitiated .


the concept of settlement is for settlement of land in favour of the landless peasants .


so far as landless is concerned , it has not been defined in the circular .


the left ( PLUL ) cavity contained almost 1 pins of blood and blood clot .


on the basis of the written notice given by him , an FIR was registered .


he had given mobile no through which messages were sent and received on the mobile .


in his cross-examination , he has stated that he has no identification with Krishna Yadav .


on 8.12.2011 , he was first stubbed at the Police Station and met his brother .


Krishna had asked his brother to meet in the field as much time was available .


she also stated that she also identified the accused persons at the Test Identification Parade .


thereafter , the police came to his house and on 11.11.2011 he accompanied the police .


due to confusion in Muharram , the FIR could not be sent in due time .


after a journey of one and a half hour , the forest area had started .


40- It appears that the prosecution witnesses were quite natural and their evidence inspires confidence .


5- The 7 witnesses in this case have been examined on behalf of the prosecution .


11- PW-2 Ramji Thakur has been named in the first information report as a witness .


after investigation , the charge sheet was submitted against the driver of the malleable bus .


he also admits that the respective shares of the parties were measured by the Amin .


the injury report will show that admittedly Alam was examined in this case on 24.06.1991 .


thus , there is a kind of case having been seen by the four petitioners .


the petitioners had become almost redundant in the Corporation and were to be made elsewhere .


again , as it happens in the State , the matter did not proceed further .


it was a state which had to be awakened from deep insomnia time and again .


in other words , it was the duty of the State to act as such .


3- In this case , the counter affidavit and the supplementary counter affidavits have been filed .


5- The defence of the accused persons was that of false implication on account of enmity .


the post mortem report ( Ext.2 ) indicates that the death took place within 20 hours .


the doctor has been cross examined regarding the manner of incident or the time of death .


Suresh Sah and Paras Sah caught hold of Maheshwari Sah and dragged her towards the bridge .


this party has been prepared having regard to filling up the lacuna in the prosecution case .


they can easily identify their family members and close neighbours even in the night without lighting .


the case of both stands different on the basis of the evidence produced by the prosecution .


it is not the claim of the petitioners that they were in this profession since 1981 .


10- We are informed in the Court that the last such test was conducted in 2001 .


behind the alleged incident , land dispute reasons have been stated as disclosed by the informant .


it is an admitted position that PW-5 and the appellants were co-sharers in the aforesaid land .


4- The Will attached to the application has been proved and marked as Ex . 1 .


there was no pressure or coercion on the testator to execute a Will in his favour .


8- On a perusal of Ext.1 , it appears that the Will was prepared on 8.8.2006 .


a sentence provided for different offences may be punishable with death penalty or imprisonment for life .


4 . consequently , the writ application has to fail and the same is accordingly dismissed .


the transferee did not acquire any right , title and interest nor was he in possession .


if it is inadmissible , then there is no document of the title of the plaintiff .


in a municipal survey Khatiyan , the entry cannot be called as conclusive proof of title .


E . to grant relief ( reliefs ) to which the petitioner is found entitled to .


the plaintiff and his brother Ravinder Singh claiming to be the grandson of Ram Charan Singh .


he also claims to pay rent and electrical connection to the State in his own name .


now it is stated that there were not only twelve sanctioned posts but sixteen accepted posts .


paras 2 to 9 of his cross examination seem to be of kinship with each other .


hence , the said order cannot be a ground for cancellation of licence renewed on 06.09.2011 .


no doubt , this is a matter which has to be examined by the State Government .


Cri.App. ( 28J ) no . 246 of 2001 . decided on 8th October , 2013 .


he has submitted that the reply letter submitted by the petitioner has not been properly valued .


prima facie , we do not find the replies furnished by the petitioner to be evaluated .


thus , the factum of partition effected in the past has been admitted by subsequent parties .


my children and children are unable to stay with me for the purpose of getting education .


it went to Monghyr on 13 . 5 . 2003 to show it to a doctor .


PW-1 Ram Prasad is a formal witness , meandhe has proved formal FIR ( Ext.1 ) .


advocate , M / s Pro Head Morgan , employee & Anr . , Financial nor report


later on , there was another Panchayat in respect of property in which lands were partitioned .


however , for more than four years , the delinquent has been successfully avoiding criminal prosecution .


15- Subject to the above direction , the appeal and the interlocutory application are disposed of .


with these two basic formalities attending to pension , the option to pension was very high .


thus , the petitioner takes the stand that he had completed the formalities on his behalf .


no separate sentence has been passed under Section 364 - A / 120 — B IPC .


5- The prosecution , in order to prove its charge , has examined the following witnesses .


when she replied yes , she had taken the money and also took the surplus case .


at the time of giving money , Bina Devi and Mamta Devi were also sitting there .


he identified Vijay Yadav as the person who had abducted his brother Sagar from the rickshaw .


11- PW5 is the victim of the incident and he is able to understand the matter .


thereafter , he took her to a temple where a girl and two persons were sitting .


later on , her father had come to Haldani and returned with his father to Kahalgaon .


PW5 ( victim ) and his younger sister PW4 Riya Kumari are witnesses to the occurrence .


the Superintendent of Police , Bhagalpur has informed that the aforesaid case is still under investigation .


Maniniyya Seema Ali Khan , J. Hon ’ ble Ganga Bilshun Shah Vs . State of Bihar


4- The name of counsel PW-1 , Rai , is recorded in the first information report .


PW-6 states that after he went with the appellant , they were residing at several places .


it was alleged that once abuses and assault were made by the petitioner with the complainant .


after receipt of final report , the learned Magistrate had heard learned counsel for the complainant .


other allegations regarding construction of the house and placement of nada kuta and trees were denied .


( III ) any other point which may be raised at the time of final hearing .


since both the Courts below had misconstrued and misinterpreted the Ex.-C Government Circular and erroneously understood .


15 . as far as the notice is concerned , the same may be mentioned here .


in my opinion , the above mentioned injury resulted into death due to shock and haemorrhage .


10 . the doctor found two ounces half digested food in the stomach of the deceased .


he claimed to have seen the accused persons in the same place for the first time .


at his instance , he took him by boat to the other side of the river .


in his cross-examination , he has stated that he is not a sensor of the ghat .


5- On 12.12.2011 , PWs 5 , 6 and 7 had come to Gurdwara at Patna .


he had gone to a house through Krishna Yadav and others and stayed there at night .


after having breakfast the next day , Krishna had talked to GM which gave him 4 p.m.


he also stated that Ravi Mahto had also taken him to the bank of the river .


after a journey of about one and a half hour , PW-13 inquired about the plant .


she also stated that during the abduction , Liberation and Dashrath were also living with her .


he also stated that he had gone to the local police station and about the occurrence .


he also stated that he had also not seen the accused persons prior to the incident .


Chameshwar Sah was arrested at 11.00 p.m. from his house and he received information on 07.12.2011 .


he further stated that no one had gone to the police station to search the accused .


PW-4 Kamal Kishore Chaudhary was neither the office bearer nor the Investigating Officer in this case .


the present case needs to be examined in the light of the constitutional propositions established above .


I did not see whether he was writing or not and I got my signature later .


from the aforesaid evidence , it appears that this witness had made statement before the police .


the effect of the evidence in this regard has to be considered by the Tribunal concerned .


he admits that he had come to the place of occurrence when he heard the cry .


she also admits that she had not received any bleeding injury at the time of occurrence .


20- Where a taxpayer had made an application to the Income-tax Officer for correcting a defect .


this Court had held to the Supreme Court that the petitioner will not be sent back .


the petitioners shall continue to function as Motor Vehicles Inspectors till the new appointments are made .


some of the payments made earlier were also mentioned by the High Court in its order .


after the expiry of his tenure , the post of Head also came to an end .


8- The prosecution , in order to prove its charge , has examined the following witnesses .


the dough was pushed into the joint condition and was part of the dross as well .


he also stated that he did not notice that Dinesh Choudhary was hurt in the head .


he has proved the endorsement on the fardbeyan which has been marked as Ext . 4 .


he has again taken the statement of the informator and has visited the place of occurrence .


he has stated that the Khagaria is at a distance of 5-6 kms from his village .


he denied that both the injured were their relations and the reports were collusive and uninappropriate .


it also appears that the incident has taken place near the house of both the parties .


when she had not returned in the evening , the family had started looking for her .


the courts below have recorded a categorical finding that the plaintiffs have possession of the property .


initially , a sandha was instituted which was later accepted as the fardbeyan of the informants .


the argument on behalf of the appellants is that the place of occurrence has been changed .


he had gone to the place of occurrence on hearing noise and had seen the incident .


9- PW5 Shiv Shankar Bhagat is the informant and one of the injured in this case .


therefore , the District Cooperative Office found it defective that the Committee of Management was in minority .


he then refers to Sub - law 26 framed for Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society ( PACS ) .


secondly , the present case was not a case of election of fresh members of the Committee .


5- In the defence , as many as eight witnesses have been produced but no documentary evidence .


PW-3 is not only one of the attesting witnesses but he is the son of the deceased .


the informator at that time was right in front of his house along with PW-3 Harendra Sah .


after the death , the fardbeyan was given , as a result of which case was registered .


Maheshwari Sah was killed by a stranger and the accused persons were dragged on account of enmity .


one side is that he was caught by Maheshwari and Maheshwari was stabbed in the same currency .


therefore , the necessary directions and instructions can be framed and issued within two months from today .


cognizance of the offence was taken and the matter was normally sent to the Court of Session .


this means that on the date of the incident , he must have been of 54 years .


Ram Bahadur Singh ( AW1 ) also signed both pages of the Will as a attesting witness .


6- In the result , the writ petition has to fail and the same is accordingly dismissed .


( b ) that he becomes the whole or part of the resources of a terrorist organisation .


taking fairness with the learned G.P. 3 , he states that in fact it was 13 office .


thus , the order of the Divisional Commissioner disfiguring the Panel had lost its importance and validity .


three additional posts have been sought to be entered into which persons appointed on contract are working .


as a result of the said suit , compromise / compromise had taken place between the parties .


however , he did not contest the claim made on behalf of the father of the petitioners .


the private respondents No. 4 to 8 claim to be the purchaser from the original land holders .


when he tried to intervene , he was assaulted by Surya Narayan Jha along with his father .


the office is directed to return the records of the lower court forthwith to the concerned Court .


PW4 is the Investigating Officer of the earlier share who was also a member of the raid .


7- Mr. Anjani Kumar , learned Additional Advocate General , has appeared for the State of Bihar .


the writ petitioner , who is a businessman , needs to keep weapons for his personal safety .


a licence can be renewed during the period during which the licence is in existence or operation .


Hon 'ble Hemant Kumar Srivastava , J. Hon 'ble Sarananda Rai @ Sarbananda Roy Versus State of Bihar


this witness had proved the appellant 's handwriting on the petition for transfer of PW4 as Ex.3 .


the slurry and the article and the Painted notes were also seized and the seizure was prepared .


such a finding could have been recorded only in an appeal properly constituted by the State Government .


heard learned counsel for the parties with regard to the following relief urged in this writ application :


( ii ) Abrasion 3 " x 1 " on the next side of the right shoulder .


when the bus reached near Godara village , there was a procession of Muharram on the road .


2- The plaintiffs-respondents had filed the aforesaid suit for decree for specific execution of contract dated 01.12.1986 .


9- Now , we deal with the judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant .


11- Once the false principle in all is found to be inapplicable by a number of decisions .


the trial court also does not appear to be very inclined to proceed with the criminal prosecution .


Amit Kumar was being taken to Motipur Hospital for treatment , but he died on the way .


13- PW-7 Ashok Moto is the second investigating officer of the case who had submitted the charge-sheet .


3- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was an applicant in the category of disability .


respondent No.6 did not participate in the counselling and was not entitled to be considered for appointment .


access to justice is neither swift and cheap nor does it diminish the burden of the court .


it has already been examined that it will not serve any purpose , if it is done .


once the order was passed by the Tribunal , perhaps there was no option with the head .


Mandhata Singh , J. — Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Views .


needless to say , the appellant did not have a licence to open any such manufacturing unit .


after the trial , the appellants have been convicted and accused Om Prakash Yadav has been acquitted .


this witness has been examined in detail , but the defence has failed to rebut his evidence .


the veena Devi , the goddess of worship and the Mamta Devi had become lighter with her .


he was at his house and he learnt that his grandson was missing from the Sagar Rickshaw .


after defraying the ransom , his son had returned from Farakka train on 25.5.2002 with his grandson .


thus , there is inconsistency in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses on this point as well .


he is demanding an amount of Rs . 25 lacs through mobile phone no.9878433782 of his house .


PW1 and others had crossed the river and had taken further at the instance of Krishna Yadav .


Krishna Yadav could , however , be traced and saw Sardar and Bhola in the sugarcane field .


he charges the fare and drove the person to the river that he wanted to go there .


he also identified the attested copy of the Station Diary entry No.121 ( Ext . Ka-2 ) .


PW-7 Rajendra Singh was talking to PW-4 Kamal Kishore Singh in the Police Station Batia through mobile .


in his cross-examination , he has stated that even prior to 08.12.2011 , he came to Betia .


Krishna Yadav had asked him to reach the station chowk at Bettiah and he had gone there .


after sometime , Krishna Yadav had come over with one person and introduced him as his brother .


thereafter , Upendra had put a pistol on his kanpati and he was taken to the jungle .


having liberated himself , he went to Bagha Station and climbed the train in the middle night .


he has narrated about the number of calls to be outside Ravindra Singh 's Mobile No. 9878633782 .


2- The first information report was instituted on the basis of fardbeyan of PW-5 Arun Kumar Thakur .


PW-3 is the brother of the informant-in-law and he claims to be an eyewitness to the incident .


9- PW-1 Ramadhar Thakur , in his examination-in-chief , has supported the allegations levelled against the appellants .


hence , I find that the aforesaid case would not apply to the facts of this case .


he claims that he had not seen any injury sustained by anybody except a far away status .


thus , this Court finds that the evidence of PW1 is not reliable for the aforesaid reasons .


he admits that when he reached the place of occurrence , accused persons were not present there .


according to this witness , he found the waist of hundreds of live hans covered with blood .


thereafter , all the aforesaid accused persons had quarrelled with the informant-in-law as well as her brothers .


thereafter , all the accused armed with different weapons had gone to the west running the bullets .


the prosecution wanted that Dinesh Choudhary should construction his wall while leaving the path for the prosecution .


all the other vises were medium within the heart , lungs , liver , kidney and spleen .


he had taken the dead body of ( DW-1 ) and other Manoj Chaudhary to the hospital .


he also stated that the prosecution was chasing his father when he was running towards Soving Road .


on the statement of his father , Khagaria , Police Station Case No.173 of 2002 was instituted .


in his cross-examination , he has admitted that he is one of the accused in this case .


she has denied the suggestion that Manoj Chaudhary had died on account of bullet fired by Pankaj .


( IV ) Inflammation and redness of about 2 " x1 / 1 " on the back .


the main ground given by the learned trial court is that the gun shot was not repeated .


if a man dies by firing a shot , then there is no question of firing again .


the main ground given by the trial court is that the shot of pistol was not repeated .


when a person is killed by the same shot , there is no question of shooting again .


21- Thus , I do not find any fault with the impugned order allowing the amendment petition .


joint of right wrist - radious with lower part of radius and ulna ( right wrist ) .


he has been questioned as to the entire period during which she was away from the house .


the material question of law , therefore , deserves to be answered in favour of the appellant .


as far as title is concerned , the authorities have no jurisdiction to judge or refer it .


therefore , the material question framed of law does not arise for trial in this second appeal .


this witness had allegedly come to his shop which is very close to the place of occurrence .


even then , it is apparent that the claimants have not made any representation on the point .


6- The prosecution , in order to prove its case , examined as many as 13 witnesses .


Tana Devi , her daughter , had accompanied appellants Hbari Devi alias Kanti Devi and Indu Devi .


she had obtained permission from her mother and thereafter had gone with her to see the movie .


no demand was made and due to the negligence of the deceased she had received accidental burn injuries .


on a request made by learned counsel for the petitioner , the matter was adjourned for four weeks .


8- The inquest report and the post mortem report were brought on record vide Exh.5 and Ext.2 respectively .


Mahasweta Sah ( since deceased ) , brother of the informant , was having meals at a chowki .


Maheshwari Sah was taken to the hospital as he was injured but died on account of his injuries .


as a matter of fact , there was no light and identification of the accused was not possible .


16- We have analysed the entire evidence of the witnesses which has always been on the same side .


the villagers are used to work in the night and their eyes are able to work with light .


PW-5 also found the prosecution case mentioned in Sashwan Police Station Case No. 37 / 02 as true .


of these five witnesses , three , namely , PWs 1 , 2 and 3 are eye witnesses .


9- From the prosecution evidence it appears that PWs 1 , 2 and 3 are the eye witnesses .


4- The challenge raised before the learned single Judge to the decision of the lower authority has failed .


she also picked up the chappals of the appellants and accused Nwal Kishore Sharma ( since deceased ) .


a ' closure ' was called in that area to protest against such act of the political person .


it was allowed on 6.7.2012 and the date of execution of the will was assumed to be 8.8.2006 .


this witness has also stated that wife of the testatrix also signed the Will as a attesting witness .


as a member of the Legislative Council , he was allotted a plot in Kautilya Nagar of Patna .


( a ) it is intended to be used in relation to the purposes of any terrorism ; or


the revision case No.82 of 1987-88 was dismissed by order contained in Annexure 11 filed by the petitioners .


3- The defendant first party had filed a countervailing written statement denying the entire case of the plaintiff .


the subsequent document whether Ex.5 or Ex.7 / A is with respect to municipal survey plot number 3448 .


it is not denied that Ex.7 and Ex.7 / A are not in respect of the suit property .


the informant , who had reached the spot of accident , found his son dead under esoteric circumstances .


hence , the appeal has come up for the appellant , Mr. Ujjwal Kumar Sinha , learned counsel .


the suit property is a house standing in plot no.209 of the property bearing area of two Kathas .


now the matter will proceed only to the female appellant , namely , Tara Devi , survived alone .


investigation was kept pending against the appellants No. 2 and other nominated accused persons , Ballia and Kurban .


further , neither the doctor nor the Investigating Officer has been examined and has also caused serious prejudice .


the above named sole appellant is discharged of the liability of the bail bond submitted on his behalf .


several other reasons are being provided to merely covers the failure of the State to appoint the petitioner .


hence , the case is based on the evidence of only one witness / victim Madan Mohan Jha .


after reaching there , she saw a quarrel between the women members and the children she had stopped .


Pratap Narayan Jha , Nandabhusan Jha , Arvind Jha , along with others , were nominated as witnesses .


12- On the other hand , learned counsel for the State supported the order of the courts below .


20- The revision petition , thus , is found to be devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed .


if it resulted in financial injury to them or would not be a ingredients of a criminal offence .


thereafter it was made over to the investigating authority but it has not been found to be supported .


on receipt of reply , District Magistrate , Saharsa had cancelled the licence on 21st February , 2008 .


he has submitted that the order dated 21.02.2008 referred to above was never communicated to the writ petitioner .


his claim could not be allowed on the ground that the said order was not received by him .


5- We shall also mention that we have checked the copies of the answer sheets placed on record .


in such a situation , I could find it dangerous to stay at Barhiya in a victim state .


in fact , the petitioner has force over the merits of the charge in the entire writ petition .


this will also be apparent from the excerpt of his explanation which has also been underlined for clarity .


he also stated that he was sent to the hospital from the police station where he was treated .


the appellant is on bail , therefore , he is discharged from the liabilities of his bail bonds .


on appeal , the lower Appellate Court confirmed the finding of the Trial Court and dismissed the appeal .


Suo Singh , Batuku Singh , Deo Narain Singh , Naresh Singh , Dasharatha Singh were the Panch .


10 . it appears to us that the delinquent has made every effort to delay the criminal prosecution .


he was subjected to cross-examination by the prosecution but nothing material could be elicited from him in cross-examination .


the version described in the fardbayan is not supported by any of the prosecution witnesses in the Court .


both these writ petitions are admitted for final disposal at this stage with the consent of the parties .


2- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsels for the Punjab National Bank ( Bank ) .


the result is that the whole object is going to be futile for which the tribunal was constituted .


the court at this stage has no meaning as to whether the petitioner has any defence or not .


whether respondent No.6 participated in the mansing or not is also not of much importance at this stage .


8- While issuing notice to respondent No.6 at this stage , it would not serve any useful purpose .


10- To set aside the impugned order , it would be necessary to send notice to respondent No.6 .


14- The Court directs the Principal Secretary to Department of Education to forward a copy of this order .


after about 12 - 13 days telephone calls were made asking for ransom for release of the ocean .


he has been cross-examined in detail , but the defence has not been able to belittle his evidence .


12- A copy of this order be sent to Chief Judicial Magistrate , Bhagalpur , for necessary action .


it is submitted that in fact witnesses have not been able to make out a case of kidnapping .


Vs . State of Bihar and another Cri.M.C.No. 112018 of 2010 . decided on 10th October , 2012 .


after repeated requests , the petitioner had not treated a sick cow at the later stage of surgery .


it is a question of fact and , therefore , cannot be allowed at the second appellate stage .


Exh.4 is a formal FIR , Exh.5 is the inquest report and Ext . 6 is case diary .


it was disclosed in para 14 that accused persons had fired shots from a distance of 15-16 yards .


after the trial , the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as aforesaid by the learned trial court .


he had given the written report , to the officer-in-charge of the police station , to the effect .


on the same day , he had gone to Ravindra Singh ’ s house at Mandi Govinda Garh .


10- On 12.12.2011 , his statement was taken before the Magistrate , which has been noted as Exhibit-3 .


thereafter , PW-8 Krishna Yadav and his two companions had left and reached the bank of the river .


Krishna and his companions used to hounce on him at intervals of 3 to 4 hours every day .


his statement was also recorded by the Magistrate which has been exhibited as Exh . 3 / 3 .


in his cross-examination , he has stated that Krishna Yadav had asked him to install a rolling machine .


he also stated that the accused were talking amongst themselves and were telling their names Bhola and Upendra .


it also appears that the appellants are members of a gang engaged in kidnap people to get ransom .


however , considering the nature of the crime , a liberal punishment cannot be awarded to the appellants .


6- PW-3 Mohd . Shamim Akhtar had stated that he is not an eye witness of the incident .


therefore , there appears to be an discrepancy in the manner in which PW-6 has described the occurrence .


this was done because the right of the petitioners to be absorbed was sufficiently taken up long ago .


the State authority was sleeping on the matter , whereby the petitioners were constrained to approach this court .


24 . it is not necessary to say that their regularization will be understood from the same date .


subsequently , payments have been made in her favour on about 4 different occasions from 25-2009 to 8.2.2012 .


despite such findings , the petitioner being the head of the Gram Panchayat had taken steps for payment .


finally , SDO has been substituted for the name of Chapra as will appear from Appendix - 27 .


he has stated that it is not a fact that the occurrence had taken place as an accident .


( I ) Externally blood and clots on the scalp , and in the area of the neck .


it was properly named and sealed in a Wall and handed over to the police for necessary action .


based on the fardbeyan of accused Dinesh Choudhary , Khagaria Police Station Case No.173 of 2002 was instituted .


( III ) inflammation , tenderness and abrasion about 1 % x1 / 1 over right shoulder joint .


injuries No. 1 , III and IV are injuries of ordinary nature caused by hard and blunt object .


the agreement must at least presume the existence of the person on whose behalf it is being admitted .


PW2 denies that he had written the love letters and that he has those letters which he wrote .


the fact that he did not do so suggests that he was a part of the entire incident .


he has specifically stated that there were two suitcases of different sizes in the room of the hotel .


5- PW-1 Ram Mohan Jha is nominated as a witness of the occurrence in the first information report .


the statement given in the cross examination indicates that he is not an eye witness to the incident .


all such factors indicate that no case is made out under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code .


none of the issues of permanence or any fraud committed by the claimant has been raised by the railways .


in para 13 , he states that the deceased was residing there for the last five to six years .


therefore , the prosecution has succeeded in proving that Maheshwari Sah died within twenty hours of the post-mortem examination .


the entire incident was seen in the light of the electric bulb which was burning at the relevant time .


informant ’ s husband had reached near the farm of Nand Kishore Singh at about 6 : 30 am .


16- The case of the prosecution is that PW-5 had gone with his companions to ploughing the aforesaid land .


Gauri Shankar Lal had typed Will which was read by the testator , whereafter , he signed the will .


the witness identified his signatures on the Will ( marked as Exts . 6 and 6 / 1 ) .


it has also been stated that when the Will was executed , the testator was physically and mentally fit .


she has stated that when the Will was executed by her father , she was physically and mentally well .


the will dated 8.8.2006 ( 1 ) is also a pure will and the last will of the testator .


the Geo - tax Survey Khatiyan ( Ext . D ) is also not related to the suit property .


( the disputed portion undernoted by me has already been deleted by the earlier preliminary order dated 18.02.2010 ) .


but not as a casual case , merely because a party has levelled some allegations against the local police .


the owner of the aforesaid land had sold the land to the appellant under a sale deed dated 28.02.2002 .


according to the appellant , the land belonged to a common ancestor and the appellant was also a co-sharer .


it is argued that defendant 's own house in Plot No. 897 and 901 was broken up in 1998 .


he submits that a conclusion to this effect can be seen in paras 29 to 33 of the judgment .


13- I have heard learned counsels for the parties and I have gone through the materials available on record .


according to the learned counsel , the issue of title should not have been looked into by the Court .


the evidence led by the defendant is as follows : - A and A / 1 are the diary .


decided on 31st July , 2013 and other CW . J . C . no . 10506 of 2008 .


4- There are several facts which both the parties have furnished which in fact makes the cases totally misconceived .


to fill these posts , the selection process was completed and finally a panel of 19 persons was made .


8- Thus , the argument that the petitioner did not come to this Court is devoid of any meaning .


further G.P. 3 also submits that there are several orders of this Court and several persons have been appointed .


during this time , execution case was further advanced and order was passed for delivery of possession on 28.10.2010 .