Create transfer_matrix.md
Browse files- transfer_matrix.md +31 -0
transfer_matrix.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Cross-Regime Transfer Matrix
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
This matrix defines cross-regime evaluation for the Clarus Clinical Stability Benchmark.
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
The purpose is to evaluate whether models can generalize **stability reasoning across different physiological systems**.
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
Traditional tabular models often learn correlations specific to a dataset.
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
The Clarus transfer benchmark evaluates whether models can detect instability when the **observable variables change but the underlying stability dynamics remain similar**.
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
---
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
# Transfer Experiments
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
| Train Dataset | Test Dataset | Evaluation Goal |
|
| 16 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 17 |
+
| clinical-hemodynamic-collapse-v0.1 | clinical-hemodynamic-collapse-v0.1 | baseline performance |
|
| 18 |
+
| clinical-hemodynamic-collapse-v0.1 | clinical-microcirculation-instability-v0.1 | circulation → tissue perfusion transfer |
|
| 19 |
+
| clinical-hemodynamic-collapse-v0.1 | clinical-cellular-energy-instability-v0.1 | circulation → metabolic transfer |
|
| 20 |
+
| clinical-microcirculation-instability-v0.1 | clinical-cellular-energy-instability-v0.1 | perfusion → cellular energy transfer |
|
| 21 |
+
| clinical-thermoregulation-instability-v0.1 | clinical-cellular-energy-instability-v0.1 | heat stress → metabolic load transfer |
|
| 22 |
+
| clinical-endocrine-instability-v0.1 | clinical-electrolyte-instability-v0.1 | metabolic regulation transfer |
|
| 23 |
+
| clinical-coagulation-instability-v0.1 | clinical-hemorrhage-compensation-collapse-v0.1 | hemostasis → hemorrhage response |
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
---
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
# Interpretation
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
Large performance drops indicate the model relied on dataset-specific correlations.
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
Stable performance across regimes suggests the model has learned **general system stability reasoning**.
|