ClarusC64 commited on
Commit
1df6834
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): a47eb05

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +233 -3
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,233 @@
1
- ---
2
- license: mit
3
- ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ language: en
3
+ license: mit
4
+ task_categories:
5
+ - text-classification
6
+ tags:
7
+ - clinical-trials
8
+ - five-node-cascade
9
+ size_categories:
10
+ - 1K<n<10K
11
+ pretty_name: Clinical Five Node Sepsis Cascade Boundary Forecast
12
+ ---
13
+
14
+ # What this repo does
15
+
16
+ This dataset models sepsis cascade boundary approach using a Clarus five-node coupling framework combined with trajectory and system dynamics.
17
+
18
+ The goal is to predict whether a patient is approaching the sepsis cascade boundary.
19
+
20
+ The dataset introduces a dynamic forecasting layer that allows models to reason about motion through the stability manifold rather than relying only on static physiological snapshots.
21
+
22
+ # Core five-node cascade
23
+
24
+ infection_pressure
25
+ immune_buffer
26
+ treatment_lag
27
+ organ_coupling
28
+ perfusion_stability
29
+
30
+ These five variables represent the interacting physiological state controlling sepsis stability.
31
+
32
+ infection_pressure
33
+ Represents infectious burden such as pathogen load, inflammatory activation, toxin pressure, or escalating host-pathogen stress.
34
+
35
+ immune_buffer
36
+ Represents patient reserve including immune resilience, metabolic compensation, and tolerance to rising infectious insult.
37
+
38
+ treatment_lag
39
+ Represents the delay between deterioration onset and effective clinical response.
40
+
41
+ organ_coupling
42
+ Represents cross-system interaction such as inflammatory spillover, renal involvement, circulatory destabilization, or multi-organ linkage.
43
+
44
+ perfusion_stability
45
+ Represents the remaining stability of tissue perfusion, circulatory adequacy, and microvascular resilience under sepsis stress.
46
+
47
+ The five-node structure models how these variables interact to produce either recoverable dynamics or cascade deterioration.
48
+
49
+ # Trajectory layer
50
+
51
+ drift_gradient represents the direction of motion in the system state space.
52
+
53
+ Values near +1 indicate motion toward instability.
54
+
55
+ Values near −1 indicate motion toward recovery.
56
+
57
+ This variable captures trajectory alignment with the instability boundary.
58
+
59
+ # Dynamic forecasting layer
60
+
61
+ Three additional variables describe how the system moves through the stability manifold.
62
+
63
+ drift_velocity — speed of motion through state space
64
+ drift_acceleration — change in velocity across consecutive time steps
65
+ boundary_distance — proximity to the instability boundary
66
+
67
+ Together these variables allow models to estimate how rapidly instability is approaching rather than simply identifying its direction.
68
+
69
+ This converts the dataset from trajectory detection into dynamic cascade forecasting.
70
+
71
+ # Dynamic variable definitions
72
+
73
+ drift_velocity
74
+
75
+ Magnitude of state change between consecutive time steps.
76
+
77
+ Definition
78
+
79
+ drift_velocity(t) = ||x(t) − x(t−1)||
80
+
81
+ Interpretation
82
+
83
+ Higher values indicate faster movement through the stability manifold.
84
+
85
+ Lower values indicate slower system evolution.
86
+
87
+ drift_acceleration
88
+
89
+ Rate of change of drift velocity across three consecutive snapshots.
90
+
91
+ Definition
92
+
93
+ drift_acceleration(t) = drift_velocity(t) − drift_velocity(t−1)
94
+
95
+ where
96
+
97
+ drift_velocity(t) = ||x(t) − x(t−1)||
98
+
99
+ Interpretation
100
+
101
+ Positive values indicate accelerating movement toward instability.
102
+
103
+ Negative values indicate deceleration or stabilization.
104
+
105
+ boundary_distance
106
+
107
+ Weighted metric distance between the current system state and the instability boundary.
108
+
109
+ Definition
110
+
111
+ Computed as weighted Euclidean distance from the current state vector to the nearest point on the instability boundary, normalized to the range 0 to 1.
112
+
113
+ Interpretation
114
+
115
+ 0 indicates the system has reached the cascade boundary.
116
+
117
+ Lower values indicate minimal remaining stability margin.
118
+
119
+ Higher values indicate greater separation from collapse.
120
+
121
+ # Prediction target
122
+
123
+ label_sepsis_cascade_boundary
124
+
125
+ Binary classification.
126
+
127
+ 1 indicates the system is entering the sepsis cascade boundary regime.
128
+
129
+ 0 indicates the system remains recoverable.
130
+
131
+ # Binary simplification note
132
+
133
+ Real sepsis deterioration unfolds as a continuous physiological process.
134
+
135
+ This dataset encodes boundary approach as a binary classification problem to simplify model evaluation and benchmarking.
136
+
137
+ # False stability example
138
+
139
+ The central challenge in this dataset is detecting cases that appear stable when viewed only through the five-node state variables.
140
+
141
+ Example
142
+
143
+ infection_pressure 0.44
144
+ immune_buffer 0.72
145
+ treatment_lag 0.21
146
+ organ_coupling 0.27
147
+ perfusion_stability 0.70
148
+ drift_gradient +0.66
149
+ drift_velocity 0.18
150
+ drift_acceleration +0.08
151
+ boundary_distance 0.07
152
+ label_sepsis_cascade_boundary 1
153
+
154
+ This row appears relatively safe if only the static state variables are considered.
155
+
156
+ However:
157
+
158
+ drift_gradient shows motion toward deterioration
159
+ drift_velocity shows active movement through state space
160
+ drift_acceleration shows increasing momentum
161
+ boundary_distance shows very little remaining stability margin
162
+
163
+ This is a false stability case.
164
+
165
+ The patient appears stable in a static snapshot but is dynamically close to deterioration.
166
+
167
+ # Row structure
168
+
169
+ scenario_id
170
+ infection_pressure
171
+ immune_buffer
172
+ treatment_lag
173
+ organ_coupling
174
+ perfusion_stability
175
+ drift_gradient
176
+ drift_velocity
177
+ drift_acceleration
178
+ boundary_distance
179
+ label_sepsis_cascade_boundary
180
+
181
+ # Files
182
+
183
+ data/train.csv
184
+ data/tester.csv
185
+ scorer.py
186
+ readme.md
187
+
188
+ # Evaluation
189
+
190
+ Models are evaluated using binary classification metrics.
191
+
192
+ accuracy
193
+ precision
194
+ recall_cascade_detection
195
+ false_safe_rate
196
+ f1
197
+ confusion_matrix
198
+
199
+ Primary metric
200
+
201
+ recall_cascade_detection
202
+
203
+ Secondary diagnostic metric
204
+
205
+ false_safe_rate
206
+
207
+ The primary goal is detecting cascade onset rather than maximizing overall accuracy.
208
+
209
+ # License
210
+
211
+ MIT
212
+
213
+ # Structural Note
214
+
215
+ Clarus datasets encode cascade instability through interacting system variables rather than isolated predictors.
216
+
217
+ Collapse emerges from coupled system dynamics rather than from any single measurement crossing a threshold.
218
+
219
+ # Production Deployment
220
+
221
+ These datasets support early warning models designed to detect deterioration trajectories before irreversible cascade occurs.
222
+
223
+ Such models may assist clinical monitoring systems by identifying dynamic instability patterns earlier than threshold-based alerts.
224
+
225
+ # Enterprise & Research Collaboration
226
+
227
+ The Clarus dataset framework can be applied across multiple domains including clinical medicine, infrastructure monitoring, complex AI systems, and other environments where cascade instability must be detected before boundary crossing.
228
+
229
+ For dataset expansion, custom coherence scorers, or deployment architecture:
230
+ team@clarusinvariant.com
231
+
232
+ Instability is detectable.
233
+ Governance determines whether it propagates.