| { |
| "language": "en", |
| "title": "Temurah", |
| "versionSource": "https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Talmud_(Wikisource)", |
| "versionTitle": "Wikisource Talmud", |
| "license": "CC-BY-SA", |
| "versionTitleInHebrew": "תלמוד (ויקיטקסט)", |
| "actualLanguage": "en", |
| "languageFamilyName": "english", |
| "isBaseText": false, |
| "isSource": false, |
| "direction": "ltr", |
| "heTitle": "תמורה", |
| "categories": [ |
| "Talmud", |
| "Bavli", |
| "Seder Kodashim" |
| ], |
| "text": [ |
| [], |
| [], |
| [ |
| "[Mishnah] ALL PERSONS CAN EXCHANGE, MEN AS WELL AS WOMEN; NOT THAT ONE IS PERMITTED TO EXCHANGE, BUT THAT IF ONE DID SO, THE SUBSTITUTE IS SACRED, AND HE RECEIVES FORTY LASHES. ", |
| "[Gemarah] [The Mishnah] contains a contradiction in itself. You say: ALL PERSONS CAN EXCHANGE, implying that it is [permissible to exchange in the first instance] and [then it says]: NOT THAT ONE IS PERMITTED TO EXCHANGE, implying, only after it has been done? ", |
| "— But how can you understand it that ALL PERSONS CAN EXCHANGE in the first instance! In that case, instead of bringing a contradiction from the Mishnah, you could rather bring it from the Scriptural verse, since it says: He shall not alter it nor change it!(Leviticus 27:10) ", |
| "Rab Judah therefore said: What [the Mishnah] means is this: ALL PERSONS CAN EFFECT AN EXCHANGE, MEN AS WELL AS WOMEN; NOT THAT ONE IS PERMITTED TO EXCHANGE, BUT THAT IF ONE DID SO, THE SUBSTITUTE IS SACRED, AND HE RECEIVES FORTY LASHES. ", |
| "What additional case is included by [the word] ALL? — It includes the case of an heir, and [the Mishnah] will not be in accordance with the view of R. Judah, ", |
| "for it has been taught: An heir can lay hands [on the head of a sacrifice]; an heir can effect exchange [with his father's dedication]. This is the teaching of R. Meir; whereas R. Judah says: An heir cannot lay hands [on the head of a sacrifice] nor can an heir effect exchange [with his father's dedication]. ", |
| "What is R. Judah's reason? — We infer the case of a preliminary act in the dedication from the case of a final act in the dedication. Just as in the case of the final act, an heir cannot lay hands [on the head of a sacrifice], so in the case of the preliminary act, an heir cannot effect exchange [with his father's dedication]. ", |
| "And how do we know this in the case of laying on of hands itself? — Three times the expression his offerings(Leviticus 3:1) is used: One [intimates that] ‘his offering’ [requires laying on of hands], but not that of a gentile. One [that] ‘his offering’, but not that of his fellow. And one ‘his offering’ but not his father's dedication. ", |
| "But as for R. Meir, who rules that an heir can effect exchange [with his father's dedication], surely ‘his offering’ is written? — He needs this in order to include partners in a sacrifice as requiring to perform laying on of hands. ", |
| "And [what does] R. Judah] [say to this]? — He does not hold that partners in a sacrifice must perform laying on of hands. What is the reason? Because their sacrifice is not designated. Or if you prefer [another solution] I may say that R. Judah may still be of the opinion [that partners in a sacrifice must perform laying on of hands] but he derives the cases both of the sacrifice of a gentile and a fellow's sacrifice from the one text. There is left over therefore one text, from which we derive that partners in a sacrifice must perform laying on of hands. ", |
| "And as to R. Meir, who rules that an heir can exchange [with his father's dedication] what is his reason? — He can tell you: [Scripture says:] And if he shall at all change, to intimate that an heir can change.(Leviticus 27:10)" |
| ] |
| ], |
| "sectionNames": [ |
| "Daf", |
| "Line" |
| ] |
| } |
