Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ We evaluated CommonLingua on CommonLID (Ortiz Suárez et al. 2026): 376 k held-o
|
|
| 46 |
| OpenLID v2 | ~600 M | 200 | 55.77 % | 70.19 % | 0.6390 |
|
| 47 |
| fastText-218 (NLLB) | ~600 M | 218 | 59.53 % | 71.64 % | 0.6590 |
|
| 48 |
| GlotLID v3 | ~600 M | **2 102** | 57.69 % | 71.26 % | 0.6729 |
|
| 49 |
-
| **CommonLingua
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
CommonLingua reaches +11.5 macro F1 over the next best baseline. We discarded Lingala from our evaluation since most samples from CommonLID turned out to belong to other close languages.
|
| 52 |
|
|
|
|
| 46 |
| OpenLID v2 | ~600 M | 200 | 55.77 % | 70.19 % | 0.6390 |
|
| 47 |
| fastText-218 (NLLB) | ~600 M | 218 | 59.53 % | 71.64 % | 0.6590 |
|
| 48 |
| GlotLID v3 | ~600 M | **2 102** | 57.69 % | 71.26 % | 0.6729 |
|
| 49 |
+
| **CommonLingua** | 2.35 M | 334 | **77.63 %** | **82.92 %** | **0.7879** |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
CommonLingua reaches +11.5 macro F1 over the next best baseline. We discarded Lingala from our evaluation since most samples from CommonLID turned out to belong to other close languages.
|
| 52 |
|