Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -52,6 +52,17 @@ Several weak but consistent patterns appear:
|
|
| 52 |
- Explicit tracks have slightly higher median popularity
|
| 53 |
- Genres differ significantly in average popularity
|
| 54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
### **Reseach Questions**
|
| 56 |
1. What percentage of songs are explicit vs. clean?
|
| 57 |
|
|
|
|
| 52 |
- Explicit tracks have slightly higher median popularity
|
| 53 |
- Genres differ significantly in average popularity
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
+
### Visualizations
|
| 56 |
+
1. Danceaiblity VS Popularity
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
There is a clear upward trend: songs with higher danceability tend to be more popular. While the relationship is not perfectly linear, the upper envelope rises consistently with danceability.
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
2.Energy VS Popularity
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
Popular songs cluster around medium-to-high energy levels. Very low-energy tracks rarely achieve high popularity, showing a clear preference for energetic music.
|
| 63 |
+
3. Loudness VS Popularity
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
There is a visible positive trend: louder songs (closer to 0 dB) tend to achieve higher popularity. Quiet tracks rarely reach high popularity, reflecting modern production and streaming trends.
|
| 66 |
### **Reseach Questions**
|
| 67 |
1. What percentage of songs are explicit vs. clean?
|
| 68 |
|